Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

The TRAIN Study: A Concussion Prevention Strategy in Middle Schools

30. November 2021 aktualisiert von: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Popular Opinion Leaders as a Sports Concussion Prevention Strategy in Middle Schools-The TRAIN Study, a Randomized Control Study

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a theory-driven intervention (TRAIN concussion education) to improve parental concussion-related attitudes, beliefs, intentions, confidence in knowledge, and self-efficacy.

Participants: 180 parents of United States middle school aged children whose children have been engaged in organized sports within the past 2 years.

Procedures: The study is a single-blind (participants) randomized control trial. The investigators will randomize eligible parents into two groups: (1) control (standard concussion education); and treatment (standard concussion education AND TRAIN concussion education) to evaluate the effectiveness of the TRAIN concussion education intervention.

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

A convenience sample of participants will be recruited from parents of United States middle school aged children whose children have been engaged in organized sports within the past 2 years. Interested parents will contact study stuff, who will ensure eligibility criteria are met.

Upon this, and completing the written informed consent process, participants will be assigned a unique identifier and randomized (simple) without replacement to one of the two study arms (control vs. treatment), using a predetermined random number generator in Excel.

Participants in the control group will receive standard concussion education materials focused on concussion prevention in youth sport. Participants in the treatment group will receive the same standard concussion education materials AND the TRAIN concussion education module. The TRAIN education module is grounded in a theoretical structure inclusive of the original intervention tenants of the Popular Opinion Leader (POL) and Diffusion of Innovations frameworks, and within the context of the socioecological model.

Participants will complete a self-administered online pre-test survey, which includes assessments of concussion-related attitudes, beliefs, intentions, confidence in knowledge, and self-efficacy. After completion of the pre-test survey, participants will complete their assigned intervention (TRAIN concussion education module + standard concussion education materials versus standard concussion education materials only).

Upon completion of their assigned intervention, participants will complete the online survey again to obtain post-test measures (post-test survey). Participants will also be scheduled to complete individual semi-structured interviews.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

103

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Vereinigte Staaten, 27514
        • University of North Carolina Injury Prevention Research Center

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult with a child/children enrolled in a United States middle school
  • Adult whose child has participated in organized sports in the past 2 years

Exclusion Criteria:

• Adult without a child/children enrolled in a United States middle school

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Aktiver Komparator: Standard Concussion Education
Participants will receive standard concussion education materials (online training) focused on concussion prevention in youth sport.
Participants will receive a standard concussion education module.
Experimental: TRAIN Concussion Education
After receiving the standard concussion education materials (online training), participants will receive an additional module, the TRAIN concussion education module.
Participants will receive the TRAIN concussion education module.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Concussion-Related Beliefs Change Score
Zeitfenster: Baseline (pre-intervention) and follow-up (post intervention approximately 7-30 days after intervention completion)
Participants are asked 6 questions concerning beliefs related to concussion risk, symptoms, and management. These items are added together to compute an overall score. Scoring scale ranges from a minimum of 6 to a maximum 24, where a higher score indicated more favorable beliefs. A change score will be computed post score-pre score.
Baseline (pre-intervention) and follow-up (post intervention approximately 7-30 days after intervention completion)
Concussion-Related Attitudes Change Score
Zeitfenster: Baseline (pre-intervention) and follow-up (post intervention approximately 7-30 days after intervention completion)
Participants are asked 20 survey items identifying an individual's attitudes about a certain behavior (e.g., seeking care). Each item is added together to compute an overall attitude score. Scoring scale ranges from a minimum of 20 to a maximum of 140, where higher scores indicate more favorable attitudes. A change score will be computed post score-pre score.
Baseline (pre-intervention) and follow-up (post intervention approximately 7-30 days after intervention completion)

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Confidence in Concussion-Related Knowledge Change Score
Zeitfenster: Baseline (pre-intervention) and follow-up (post intervention approximately 7-30 days after intervention completion)
Participants are asked 2 questions concerning confidence in knowing and recognizing concussion symptoms. These items are added together to compute an overall score. Scoring scale ranges from a minimum of 2 to a maximum 8, where a higher score indicated better confidence in concussion knowledge. A change score will be computed post score-pre score.
Baseline (pre-intervention) and follow-up (post intervention approximately 7-30 days after intervention completion)
Concussion-Related Intentions Change Score
Zeitfenster: Baseline (pre-intervention) and follow-up (post intervention approximately 7-30 days after intervention completion)
Participants are asked 4 questions assessing intention to engage in or talk with others about concussion prevention. The items are totaled to compute an overall behavioral intention score. Scoring scale ranges from a minimum of 4 to a maximum of 16, where a higher score indicates a better likelihood to engage in favorable behaviors related to concussion prevention. A change score will be computed post score-pre score.
Baseline (pre-intervention) and follow-up (post intervention approximately 7-30 days after intervention completion)
Concussion-Related Self-Efficacy Change Score
Zeitfenster: Baseline (pre-intervention) and follow-up (post intervention approximately 7-30 days after intervention completion)
Participants are asked 8 questions assessing their self-efficacy regarding engaging in or talking with others about concussion prevention. The items are totaled to compute an overall self-efficacy score. Scoring scale ranges from a minimum of 8 to a maximum of 32, where a higher score indicates higher self-efficacy. A change score will be computed post score-pre score.
Baseline (pre-intervention) and follow-up (post intervention approximately 7-30 days after intervention completion)

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Zachary Kerr, PhD, MPH, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

17. Mai 2021

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

15. Oktober 2021

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

30. Oktober 2021

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

7. April 2021

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

7. April 2021

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

12. April 2021

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

15. Dezember 2021

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

30. November 2021

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. November 2021

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

JA

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.

IPD-Sharing-Zeitrahmen

9 - 36 months following publication

IPD-Sharing-Zugriffskriterien

IRB, IEC, or REB and an executed data use/sharing agreement with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Art der unterstützenden IPD-Freigabeinformationen

  • STUDIENPROTOKOLL
  • SAFT

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Gehirnerschütterung, Gehirn

Klinische Studien zur Standard Concussion Education

Abonnieren