乳児の細気管支炎の 3% 高張食塩水の噴霧治療
2026年7月14日 更新者：Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, Mexico
小児科病院における急性細気管支炎の治療におけるサルブタモールを含む噴霧 3% 高張生理食塩水のランダム化試験
- Determine the efficacy of nebulized salbutamol/hypertonic saline combination in moderate to severe bronchiolitis.
調査の概要
状態
状態
完了
条件
条件
介入・治療
介入・治療
詳細な説明
- Study design: triple-blind, randomized, parallel-controlled prospective study.
- Location: Department of pediatric emergencies and pediatric hospitalization of Highly Specialized Medical Unit (HSMU), Hospital of Gynecology-Obstetrics and Pediatrics (HGOP) No. 48, Mexican Institute of Social Security (MISS).
- Patients: 64 patients were included; 32 for each group. Patients had between 2 and 24 months of age with a first episode of wheezing associated with respiratory distress and a history of infection of the upper respiratory tract, with moderate to severe degree of respiratory distress according to the Respiratory Distress Scale of Sant Joan de Déu Hospital (SJDH) .
- Interventions: the randomly allocated patients received in group I nebulised 0.9% saline with salbutamol 100 micrograms / kg / dose for 3 initial sessions lasting 20 minutes each and every 4 hours. In group II , hypertonic (3%) saline plus salbutamol 100 micrograms / kg / dose for 3 initial sessions lasting 20 minutes each and every 4 hours. In both groups, will be performed at baseline Scale SJDH Respiratory Distress and the end of the first 3 sessions, you will have 30 minutes to make the second evaluation and at 4 hours the third at 8 hours and then every 24 hours throughout the hospital stay . The independent variable is the intervention with hypertonic saline 3% and the variable primary outcome will be assessed improvement or cure with Respiratory Distress Scale SJDH and secondary outcome will be the time of hospital stay .
- Descriptive statistics of all variables will be reported. T test was used for two independent groups or nonparametric test according to the distribution of the variables to compare the clinical improvement between the groups with the Scale of Respiratory Distress SJDH, as well as to determine whether there is a difference in time of hospital stay between the two study groups. Square test or Fisher exact chi used to compare readmissions for bronchial hyperresponsiveness between the two groups as well as the complications of the disease itself in each study group. Be reported with frequencies and percentages side effects of hypertonic saline 3%. Was considered statistically significant p <0.05. The results with the Number Cruncher Statistical System (NCSS) 2026 statistical program will be discussed.
- The sample size was calculated with t-test to compare means of continuous variables, resulting in 26 subjects per group, adjusting for an expected 20% attrition rate, the sample size was expanded to 32 patients per group.
研究の種類
研究の種類
介入
入学 (実際)
入学
64
段階
段階
- フェーズ 4
連絡先と場所
このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。
研究場所
-
-
Guanajuato
-
León、Guanajuato、メキシコ、37320
- Unidad Medica de Alta Especialidad Bajío No. 48 Hospital de Gineco - Pediatría. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
-
-
参加基準
研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。
適格基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
2ヶ月～2年 (子)
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
いいえ
受講資格のある性別
全て
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- All pediatric patients aged 2 months to 24 months of age, both genders attending the pediatric emergency service.
- With first episode of wheezing associated with respiratory distress and a history of upper respiratory tract infection.
- You have the evaluation of respiratory difficulty with Scale Hospital Sant Joan de Deu (HSJD) from 6 to 16 at entry points (moderate and severe degree).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects with a history of previous wheezing, asthma, or who have received bronchodilator treatment before the present illness.
- Subjects with chronic lung disease, with heart disease, with congenital or acquired anatomic abnormalities of the airway.
研究計画
このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：処理
- 割り当て：ランダム化
- 介入モデル：並列代入
- マスキング：4倍
アーム数
2
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
アクティブコンパレータ：Nebulized 0.9% Sodium Chloride
Salbutamol 100 micrograms / kg / dose administered 0.9 % saline solution (4ml) nebulized for 3 initial sessions lasting 20 minutes each and every 4 hours during the entire hospital stay. |
Salbutamol 100 micrograms / kg / dose administered 0.9% saline solution (4ml) nebulized for 3 initial sessions lasting 20 minutes each and every 4 hours during the entire hospital stay.
他の名前：
|
|
実験的：Nebulized 3% Sodium Chloride
Salbutamol 100 micrograms / kg / dose administered 3 % saline solution (4ml) nebulized for 3 initial sessions lasting 20 minutes each and every 4 hours during the entire hospital stay. |
Salbutamol 100 micrograms / kg / dose administered 3 % saline solution (4ml) nebulized for 3 initial sessions lasting 20 minutes each and every 4 hours during the entire hospital stay.
他の名前：
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Score Respiratory Distress
時間枠：Basal, 30 minutes after the end of the first 3 continuous nebulization sessions, at 4 hours, 8 hours, and every 24 hours during the entire hospital stay, up to 168 hours.
|
It is a validated clinical scale, sufficiently reliable measure of Severity of the respiratory distress. It consists of the summation score of the sibilance / crackling parameters (the largest of them), respiratory effort, pulmonary air inlet, oxygen saturation, heart rate and breathing rate. It is stratified into 3 levels of severity: mild from 0 to 5 points, moderate from 6 to 10 and severe from 10 to 16. |
Basal, 30 minutes after the end of the first 3 continuous nebulization sessions, at 4 hours, 8 hours, and every 24 hours during the entire hospital stay, up to 168 hours.
|
|
Hours of Hospital Stay
時間枠：From the patient's enrollment in the study until hospital discharge or 168 hours.
|
Each patient record the time of entry and measured the total hospital stay time in hours, recording the time of discharge to determine the total stay in hours. The hospital stay will be evaluated in hours. Staying hospitalized until they had mild respiratory stage scale scores for at least 2 hrs. |
From the patient's enrollment in the study until hospital discharge or 168 hours.
|
|
Hospital Readmission
時間枠：Throughout the stay for each patient until discharge. Follow-up will be continued for a period of 30 days in which they may present readmissions, complications or adverse effects.
|
After the first admission of each patient will be evaluated during the next 30 days, if a patient is readmitted for any respiratory disease, respiratory distress, pneumonia or bronchiolitis. Considering as non-serious risks that do not compromise life, tachycardia, tremor, increased access to cough immediately to the inhalation, as well as the ardor of nasal mucosa, all these with limited characteristics, however, these do not put at risk The health of the patient, so they were not measured. |
Throughout the stay for each patient until discharge. Follow-up will be continued for a period of 30 days in which they may present readmissions, complications or adverse effects.
|
|
Frequency of Complications of the Disease Itself
時間枠：Throughout the stay for each patient until discharge. Follow-up will be continued for a period of 30 days in which they may present readmissions, complications or adverse effects.
|
The presence or absence of clinical data to warrant dehydration of hydration, infected by bacteria, pneumothorax, interstitial emphysema and subcutaneous be evaluated. |
Throughout the stay for each patient until discharge. Follow-up will be continued for a period of 30 days in which they may present readmissions, complications or adverse effects.
|
協力者と研究者
ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。
捜査官
捜査官
- スタディディレクター：Gloria P Sosa-Bustamante, MD、Unidad Medica de Alta Especialidad No.48. HGP. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
出版物と役立つリンク
研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。
一般刊行物
- Postiaux G, Louis J, Labasse HC, Gerroldt J, Kotik AC, Lemuhot A, Patte C. Evaluation of an alternative chest physiotherapy method in infants with respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis. Respir Care. 2011 Jul;56(7):989-94. doi: 10.4187/respcare.00721. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
- Grewal S, Ali S, McConnell DW, Vandermeer B, Klassen TP. A randomized trial of nebulized 3% hypertonic saline with epinephrine in the treatment of acute bronchiolitis in the emergency department. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Nov;163(11):1007-12. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.196.
- Kuzik BA, Flavin MP, Kent S, Zielinski D, Kwan CW, Adeleye A, Vegsund BC, Rossi C. Effect of inhaled hypertonic saline on hospital admission rate in children with viral bronchiolitis: a randomized trial. CJEM. 2010 Nov;12(6):477-84. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500012690.
- Luo Z, Fu Z, Liu E, Xu X, Fu X, Peng D, Liu Y, Li S, Zeng F, Yang X. Nebulized hypertonic saline treatment in hospitalized children with moderate to severe viral bronchiolitis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 Dec;17(12):1829-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03304.x. Epub 2010 Jul 15.
- Sharma BS, Gupta MK, Rafik SP. Hypertonic (3%) saline vs 0.93% saline nebulization for acute viral bronchiolitis: a randomized controlled trial. Indian Pediatr. 2013 Aug;50(8):743-7. doi: 10.1007/s13312-013-0216-8. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
- Gupta N, Puliyel A, Manchanda A, Puliyel J. Nebulized hypertonic-saline vs epinephrine for bronchiolitis; proof of concept study of cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. Indian Pediatr. 2012 Jul;49(7):543-7. doi: 10.1007/s13312-012-0122-5. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
- Al-Ansari K, Sakran M, Davidson BL, El Sayyed R, Mahjoub H, Ibrahim K. Nebulized 5% or 3% hypertonic or 0.9% saline for treating acute bronchiolitis in infants. J Pediatr. 2010 Oct;157(4):630-4, 634.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.04.074. Epub 2010 Jun 19.
- Luo Z, Liu E, Luo J, Li S, Zeng F, Yang X, Fu Z. Nebulized hypertonic saline/salbutamol solution treatment in hospitalized children with mild to moderate bronchiolitis. Pediatr Int. 2010 Apr;52(2):199-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2009.02941.x. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
研究記録日
これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。
主要日程の研究
研究開始
研究開始
2013年8月1日
一次修了 (実際)
一次修了
2017年3月1日
研究の完了 (実際)
研究の完了
2017年3月1日
試験登録日
最初に提出
最初に提出
2014年5月7日
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
2014年9月4日
最初の投稿 (推定)
最初の投稿
2014年9月9日
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
投稿された最後の更新
2026年10月2日
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
2026年7月14日
最終確認日
最終確認日
2026年7月1日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
追加の関連 MeSH 用語
その他の研究ID番号
その他の研究ID番号
- R-2012-1002-43
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
いいえ
IPD プランの説明
We have your membership number social security and personal data such as address and telephone number of the parents.
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。