Standard Medical Care or Urgent Chest X-ray in Diagnosing Lung Cancer in Smokers With Chest Symptoms Who Are Older Than 60 Years
A Pilot Clinical Trial Looking at the Effect on Lung Cancer Diagnosis of Giving a CXR to Smokers Aged Over 60 With Chest Symptoms
RATIONALE: Diagnostic procedures, such as an urgent chest x-ray, may help in planning cancer treatment. It is not yet known whether standard medical care is more effective than an urgent x-ray in diagnosing lung cancer in smokers with chest symptoms who are older than 60 years.
PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying standard medical care to see how well it works compared with an urgent chest x-ray in diagnosing lung cancer in smokers with chest symptoms who are older than 60 years.
연구 개요
상태
상세 설명
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- To determine the prevalence of extra-NICE symptoms in patients consulting in UK general practice.
- To determine the proportion of patients who agree to participate in the trial.
- To determine the proportion of patients who are diagnosed with lung cancer and the best sources of routine data for capturing lung cancers.
Secondary
- To determine the best way to train general practitioners to identify and recruit eligible patients into the trial.
- To determine the most effective method of presenting the trial (and randomization) to patients.
- To determine the barriers to recruitment and how to overcome those barriers.
- To determine the best tools to use to measure anxiety/depression that may be caused by unnecessary chest-x-rays or no chest x-rays.
- To determine the best measures of resource use to facilitate health economic analysis of the cost-effectiveness of 'extra-NICE'.
- To determine the stage at diagnosis, performance status, and the proportion of patients receiving radical treatments in those diagnosed with lung cancer.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm A: Patients are managed as per the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines.
- Arm B: Patients are referred for an urgent chest x-ray according to extra-NICE guidelines.
General practitioners from South East Wales are surveyed to assess their level of interest in the proposed full trial. For the feasibility study, 20 South East Wales general practices and 6 South Yorkshire general practices are selected. General practitioners are trained to recruit all patients who fulfill the extra-NICE criteria as well as those who do not.
Patients complete questionnaires (HADS, EQ-5D, and ICECAP[O]) at baseline and at 2 months to measure quality of life and health economic analysis of the cost-effectiveness of extra-NICE guidelines.
Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK.
연구 유형
등록 (예상)
단계
- 해당 없음
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
연구 대상 성별
설명
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Patients over 60 seeing a participating General Practitioner
Currently smokes 10 or more pack years, meeting at least one of the following criteria:
- New or altered cough of any duration reported to primary care
- Increased breathlessness or wheezing (with or without purulent sputum)
Do not qualify for an urgent referral for a chest x-ray under the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines (i.e., hemoptysis or unexplained or persistent [lasting > 3 weeks] signs or symptoms), including having any of the following:
- Cough
- Chest/shoulder pain
- Dyspnea
- Weight loss
- Chest signs
- Hoarseness
- Finger clubbing
- Features suggestive of metastasis from a lung cancer (e.g., in the brain, bone, liver, or skin)
- Cervical/supraclavicular lymphadenopathy
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
- Not specified
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
- No chest x-ray within in past 3 months
- No need for a chest x-ray within the next 3 weeks for reasons other than those listed under Disease Characteristics
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 특수 증상
- 할당: 무작위
- 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
|---|
|
Prevalence of extra-NICE symptoms in patients consulting in UK general practice
|
|
Proportion of patients who agree to participate in the trial
|
|
Proportion of patients who are diagnosed with lung cancer and the best sources of routine data for capturing lung cancers
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
|---|
|
Best way to train general practitioners to identify and recruit eligible patients into the trial
|
|
Most effective method of presenting the trial (and randomization) to patients
|
|
Barriers to recruitment and how to overcome those barriers
|
|
Best tools to use to measure anxiety/depression that may be caused by unnecessary chest-x-rays or no chest x-rays
|
|
Best measures of resource use to facilitate health economic analysis of the cost-effectiveness of 'extra-NICE'
|
|
Stage at diagnosis, performance status, and the proportion of patients receiving radical treatments in those diagnosed with lung cancer
|
|
False-positive and false-negative rates for chest x-rays
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
수사관
- 수석 연구원: Richard Neal, MD, North Wales Clinical School
간행물 및 유용한 링크
일반 간행물
- Prout H, Tod A, Neal R, Nelson A. Maximising recruitment of research participants into a general practice based randomised controlled trial concerning lung diagnosis-staff insights from an embedded qualitative study. Trials. 2022 Mar 21;23(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06125-y.
- Prout HC, Barham A, Bongard E, Tudor-Edwards R, Griffiths G, Hamilton W, Harrop E, Hood K, Hurt CN, Nelson R, Porter C, Roberts K, Rogers T, Thomas-Jones E, Tod A, Yeo ST, Neal RD, Nelson A. Patient understanding and acceptability of an early lung cancer diagnosis trial: a qualitative study. Trials. 2018 Aug 4;19(1):419. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2803-4.
- Neal RD, Barham A, Bongard E, Edwards RT, Fitzgibbon J, Griffiths G, Hamilton W, Hood K, Nelson A, Parker D, Porter C, Prout H, Roberts K, Rogers T, Thomas-Jones E, Tod A, Yeo ST, Hurt CN. Immediate chest X-ray for patients at risk of lung cancer presenting in primary care: randomised controlled feasibility trial. Br J Cancer. 2017 Jan;116(3):293-302. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.414. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
- Hurt CN, Roberts K, Rogers TK, Griffiths GO, Hood K, Prout H, Nelson A, Fitzgibbon J, Barham A, Thomas-Jones E, Edwards RT, Yeo ST, Hamilton W, Tod A, Neal RD. A feasibility study examining the effect on lung cancer diagnosis of offering a chest X-ray to higher-risk patients with chest symptoms: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Nov 26;14:405. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-405.
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작
기본 완료 (예상)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (추정)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (추정)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .
설문지 관리에 대한 임상 시험
-
University Hospital, Toulouse모병
-
Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero알려지지 않은
-
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of Cambridge알려지지 않은근골격계 질환 | 근골격계 부상
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris완전한
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); Stanford University; PATH; Menzies... 그리고 다른 협력자들아직 모집하지 않음
-
Medical University of Lublin완전한
-
Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University모병
-
Istanbul Kültür UniversityMarmara University; Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)완전한