Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Robotic Therapy and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients With Stroke (ROTS)

15 de outubro de 2020 atualizado por: University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
Stroke is the second cause of death worldwide and represented the first cause of death in Brazil between 2006 and 2010. Most patients survive, and there is a need to develop cost-effective rehabilitation strategies to decrease the burden of disability from stroke. This study addresses this important issue, by combining two different interventions in the early phase post-stroke: robotic therapy associated or not with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), as adjuvant interventions to conventional physical therapy, for motor upper limb rehabilitation.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

Our main goal is to confirm the safety of robotic therapy associated with active tDCS and conventional therapy, compared to robotic therapy associated with sham tDCS and to conventional therapy, and to conventional therapy alone, for upper limb rehabilitation in an early phase (3-9 weeks) after stroke. Patients will be randomized to receive one of these three treatments, 3 times per week, for 6 weeks.

Data about eventual adverse effect will be collected in each session of treatment. The working hypothesis is that robotic therapy associated with active tDCS and conventional therapy will be as safe as robotic therapy associated with conventional therapy, and as conventional therapy alone.

We will aso preliminarily evaluate the efficacy of robotic therapy associated with active tDCS and conventional therapy, compared to robotic therapy associated with sham tDCS and to conventional therapy alone, in improvement of upper limb motor impairment.

Our secondary goals are: 1) To evaluate safety and upper limb motor impairments in patients submitted to each of the three interventions, 6 months after end of treatment; 2) To compare effects of the abovementioned interventions on disability, spasticity and quality of life, in patients at an early stage after stroke, immediately after treatment and 6 months later.

The working hypothesis is that the association of robotic therapy, tDCS and conventional therapy will lead to better outcomes than robotic therapy and conventional therapy, or conventional therapy alone.

Patients will be assessed before the first session and after the last session of treatment, as well as 6 months after the last session of treatment.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

9

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

    • SP
      • São Paulo, SP, Brasil, 05403900
        • Hospital das Clinicas

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

18 anos e mais velhos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke onset 3 - 9 weeks before the recruiting, confirmed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.
  • Moderate to severe motor impairment of an upper limb, defined as a score between 7 - 42 on the Upper Limb Subscale of Fugl Meyer Assessment of Sensorimotor Recovery after stroke.
  • Ability to provide written informed consent (patient ou legal representative)
  • Ability to comply with the schedule of interventions and evaluations in the protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe spasticity at the paretic elbow, wrist or fingers, defined as a score of > 3 on the Modified Ashworth Spasticity Scale.
  • Upper limb plegia
  • Uncontrolled medical problems such as end-stage cancer or renal disease
  • Pregnancy
  • Seizures, except for a single seizure during the first week post stroke
  • Pacemakers
  • Other neurological disorders such as Parkinson's disease
  • Psychiatric illness including severe depression
  • Aphasia ou severe cognitive deficits that compromise comprehension of the experimental protocol or ability to provide consent.
  • Hemineglect
  • Drugs that interfere on cortical excitability, except for antidepressants
  • Cerebellar lesions

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Triplo

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Comparador Ativo: Active tDCS + robotic therapy + physical therapy

Active tDCS (transcranial direct current stimulation) will be applied prior to the robotic training. After robot training, the patient will receive physical therapy for 40 minutes.

Number of treatment sessions: 18 (3 times a week, for 6 weeks).

A terapia robótica (MIT - Manus, Interactive Motion Technologies) será administrada por 40 minutos no membro superior parético.
Active tDCS will be applied with the cathode positioned over the ipsilesional primary motor cortex and the anode over the contralateral supraorbital region for 20 minutes (1mA).
Physical therapy will be administered for 40 minutes.
Comparador Ativo: sham tDCS + robotic therapy + physical therapy

Sham tDCS (transcranial direct current stimulation) will be applied prior to robotic training. After robot training, the patient will receive physical therapy for 40 minutes.

Number of treatment sessions: 18 (3 times a week, for 6 weeks).

A terapia robótica (MIT - Manus, Interactive Motion Technologies) será administrada por 40 minutos no membro superior parético.
Physical therapy will be administered for 40 minutes.
In sham tDCS, no current will be delivered through the tDCS device.
Experimental: sham tDCS + physical therapy + occupational therapy
Sham tDCS (transcranial direct current stimulation) will be applied prior to conventional therapy (40 minutes of physical therapy and 40 minutes of occupational therapy) Number of treatment sessions: 18 (3 times a week, for 6 weeks).
Physical therapy will be administered for 40 minutes.
In sham tDCS, no current will be delivered through the tDCS device.
Occupational therapy will be administered for 40 minutes.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Change in Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer Assessment
Prazo: 6 weeks from baseline
Change in Motor function subscale was assessed. Scores range from 0 to 66. Lower scores indicate greater severity.
6 weeks from baseline
Percentage of Sessions With Adverse Events
Prazo: Post treatment (6 weeks from baseline).
Post treatment (6 weeks from baseline).

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Change in Modified Rankin Scale
Prazo: 6 weeks from baseline
Scores range from 0 to 6. Higher scores indicate greater severity.
6 weeks from baseline
Change in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
Prazo: 6 weeks from baseline
Scores range from 0 to 42. Higher scores indicate greater severity.
6 weeks from baseline
Change in Stroke Impact Scale
Prazo: 6 weeks from baseline
Scores in each domain of the Stroke Impact Scale range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. The change was calculated as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point; so that, positive numbers represent increases and negative numbers represent decreases.
6 weeks from baseline
Number of Participants Who Presented Score on Modified Ashworth Scale >2
Prazo: 6 weeks
Scores range from 0 to 4, with 5 choices. A score of 1 indicates no resistance, and 4 indicates rigidity.
6 weeks
Change in Motor Activity Log
Prazo: 6 weeks from baseline
Each domain contains taks scored on 0 to 5 ordinal scale. Lower scores indicate greater severity.
6 weeks from baseline
Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer Assessment
Prazo: 6 months follow-up
Motor function subscale was assessed. Scores range from 0 to 66. Lower scores indicate greater severity.
6 months follow-up
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Prazo: 6 months follow-up
6 months follow-up
Change in Fatigue Severity Scale
Prazo: 6 weeks from baseline

Fatigue Severity Scale is a 9 -item questionnaire. Each item scores on a 7-point scale.

The total score range from 9 to 63 points. Higher scores indicate greater fatigue.

6 weeks from baseline
Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Prazo: 6 weeks from baseline
The global Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score is calculated by totaling the seven component scores, providing an overall score ranging from 0 to 21. Lower scores denote a healthier sleep quality.
6 weeks from baseline

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Adriana B Conforto, MD Phd, University of Sao Paulo

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo

1 de junho de 2015

Conclusão Primária (Real)

1 de dezembro de 2016

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

1 de dezembro de 2016

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

20 de fevereiro de 2015

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

9 de abril de 2015

Primeira postagem (Estimativa)

15 de abril de 2015

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

20 de outubro de 2020

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

15 de outubro de 2020

Última verificação

1 de dezembro de 2015

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

produto fabricado e exportado dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Ensaios clínicos em Terapia Robótica

Se inscrever