此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Robotic Therapy and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients With Stroke (ROTS)

2020年10月15日 更新者:University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
Stroke is the second cause of death worldwide and represented the first cause of death in Brazil between 2006 and 2010. Most patients survive, and there is a need to develop cost-effective rehabilitation strategies to decrease the burden of disability from stroke. This study addresses this important issue, by combining two different interventions in the early phase post-stroke: robotic therapy associated or not with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), as adjuvant interventions to conventional physical therapy, for motor upper limb rehabilitation.

研究概览

详细说明

Our main goal is to confirm the safety of robotic therapy associated with active tDCS and conventional therapy, compared to robotic therapy associated with sham tDCS and to conventional therapy, and to conventional therapy alone, for upper limb rehabilitation in an early phase (3-9 weeks) after stroke. Patients will be randomized to receive one of these three treatments, 3 times per week, for 6 weeks.

Data about eventual adverse effect will be collected in each session of treatment. The working hypothesis is that robotic therapy associated with active tDCS and conventional therapy will be as safe as robotic therapy associated with conventional therapy, and as conventional therapy alone.

We will aso preliminarily evaluate the efficacy of robotic therapy associated with active tDCS and conventional therapy, compared to robotic therapy associated with sham tDCS and to conventional therapy alone, in improvement of upper limb motor impairment.

Our secondary goals are: 1) To evaluate safety and upper limb motor impairments in patients submitted to each of the three interventions, 6 months after end of treatment; 2) To compare effects of the abovementioned interventions on disability, spasticity and quality of life, in patients at an early stage after stroke, immediately after treatment and 6 months later.

The working hypothesis is that the association of robotic therapy, tDCS and conventional therapy will lead to better outcomes than robotic therapy and conventional therapy, or conventional therapy alone.

Patients will be assessed before the first session and after the last session of treatment, as well as 6 months after the last session of treatment.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

9

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • SP
      • São Paulo、SP、巴西、05403900
        • Hospital das Clínicas

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 及以上 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke onset 3 - 9 weeks before the recruiting, confirmed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.
  • Moderate to severe motor impairment of an upper limb, defined as a score between 7 - 42 on the Upper Limb Subscale of Fugl Meyer Assessment of Sensorimotor Recovery after stroke.
  • Ability to provide written informed consent (patient ou legal representative)
  • Ability to comply with the schedule of interventions and evaluations in the protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe spasticity at the paretic elbow, wrist or fingers, defined as a score of > 3 on the Modified Ashworth Spasticity Scale.
  • Upper limb plegia
  • Uncontrolled medical problems such as end-stage cancer or renal disease
  • Pregnancy
  • Seizures, except for a single seizure during the first week post stroke
  • Pacemakers
  • Other neurological disorders such as Parkinson's disease
  • Psychiatric illness including severe depression
  • Aphasia ou severe cognitive deficits that compromise comprehension of the experimental protocol or ability to provide consent.
  • Hemineglect
  • Drugs that interfere on cortical excitability, except for antidepressants
  • Cerebellar lesions

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:三倍

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
有源比较器:Active tDCS + robotic therapy + physical therapy

Active tDCS (transcranial direct current stimulation) will be applied prior to the robotic training. After robot training, the patient will receive physical therapy for 40 minutes.

Number of treatment sessions: 18 (3 times a week, for 6 weeks).

机器人疗法(麻省理工学院 - Manus,Interactive Motion Technologies)将对麻痹上肢进行 40 分钟。
Active tDCS will be applied with the cathode positioned over the ipsilesional primary motor cortex and the anode over the contralateral supraorbital region for 20 minutes (1mA).
Physical therapy will be administered for 40 minutes.
有源比较器:sham tDCS + robotic therapy + physical therapy

Sham tDCS (transcranial direct current stimulation) will be applied prior to robotic training. After robot training, the patient will receive physical therapy for 40 minutes.

Number of treatment sessions: 18 (3 times a week, for 6 weeks).

机器人疗法(麻省理工学院 - Manus,Interactive Motion Technologies)将对麻痹上肢进行 40 分钟。
Physical therapy will be administered for 40 minutes.
In sham tDCS, no current will be delivered through the tDCS device.
实验性的:sham tDCS + physical therapy + occupational therapy
Sham tDCS (transcranial direct current stimulation) will be applied prior to conventional therapy (40 minutes of physical therapy and 40 minutes of occupational therapy) Number of treatment sessions: 18 (3 times a week, for 6 weeks).
Physical therapy will be administered for 40 minutes.
In sham tDCS, no current will be delivered through the tDCS device.
Occupational therapy will be administered for 40 minutes.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change in Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer Assessment
大体时间:6 weeks from baseline
Change in Motor function subscale was assessed. Scores range from 0 to 66. Lower scores indicate greater severity.
6 weeks from baseline
Percentage of Sessions With Adverse Events
大体时间:Post treatment (6 weeks from baseline).
Post treatment (6 weeks from baseline).

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change in Modified Rankin Scale
大体时间:6 weeks from baseline
Scores range from 0 to 6. Higher scores indicate greater severity.
6 weeks from baseline
Change in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
大体时间:6 weeks from baseline
Scores range from 0 to 42. Higher scores indicate greater severity.
6 weeks from baseline
Change in Stroke Impact Scale
大体时间:6 weeks from baseline
Scores in each domain of the Stroke Impact Scale range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. The change was calculated as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point; so that, positive numbers represent increases and negative numbers represent decreases.
6 weeks from baseline
Number of Participants Who Presented Score on Modified Ashworth Scale >2
大体时间:6 weeks
Scores range from 0 to 4, with 5 choices. A score of 1 indicates no resistance, and 4 indicates rigidity.
6 weeks
Change in Motor Activity Log
大体时间:6 weeks from baseline
Each domain contains taks scored on 0 to 5 ordinal scale. Lower scores indicate greater severity.
6 weeks from baseline
Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer Assessment
大体时间:6 months follow-up
Motor function subscale was assessed. Scores range from 0 to 66. Lower scores indicate greater severity.
6 months follow-up
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
大体时间:6 months follow-up
6 months follow-up
Change in Fatigue Severity Scale
大体时间:6 weeks from baseline

Fatigue Severity Scale is a 9 -item questionnaire. Each item scores on a 7-point scale.

The total score range from 9 to 63 points. Higher scores indicate greater fatigue.

6 weeks from baseline
Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
大体时间:6 weeks from baseline
The global Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score is calculated by totaling the seven component scores, providing an overall score ranging from 0 to 21. Lower scores denote a healthier sleep quality.
6 weeks from baseline

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Adriana B Conforto, MD Phd、University of Sao Paulo

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

2015年6月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2016年12月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2016年12月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2015年2月20日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2015年4月9日

首次发布 (估计)

2015年4月15日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2020年10月20日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2020年10月15日

最后验证

2015年12月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

在美国制造并从美国出口的产品

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

机器人治疗的临床试验

3
订阅