Эта страница была переведена автоматически, точность перевода не гарантируется. Пожалуйста, обратитесь к английской версии для исходного текста.

Study of Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 Versus Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI With Biomarker Stratification in Participants With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) (MAVERICC)

30 июня 2016 г. обновлено: Genentech, Inc.

MAVERICC (Marker Evaluation for Avastin Research in CRC): A Randomized Phase II Study of Bevacizumab+mFOLFOX6 Vs. Bevacizumab+FOLFIRI With Biomarker Stratification in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

This will be a randomized, open-label, multicenter, Phase II study with primary objectives to assess whether expression of select chemotherapy markers is associated with progression-free survival (PFS) in participants treated with bevacizumab plus leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or bevacizumab plus leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI). The study population will consist of participants with first-line mCRC.

Обзор исследования

Статус

Завершенный

Условия

Вмешательство/лечение

Тип исследования

Интервенционный

Регистрация (Действительный)

376

Фаза

  • Фаза 2

Контакты и местонахождение

В этом разделе приведены контактные данные лиц, проводящих исследование, и информация о том, где проводится это исследование.

Места учебы

  • Ирландия
      • Cork, Ирландия
      • Dublin, Ирландия, 24
      • Galway, Ирландия
  • Канада
    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Канада, T6G 1Z2
  • Норвегия
      • Oslo, Норвегия, 0407
  • Португалия
      • Coimbra, Португалия, 3000-075
      • Lisboa, Португалия, 1649-035
      • Porto, Португалия, 4200-072
  • Соединенные Штаты
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, Соединенные Штаты, 35294
    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, Соединенные Штаты, 72205-7199
    • California
      • Bellflower, California, Соединенные Штаты, 90706
      • Duarte, California, Соединенные Штаты, 91010
      • Fountain Valley, California, Соединенные Штаты, 92708
      • Fresno, California, Соединенные Штаты, 93720
      • Hayward, California, Соединенные Штаты, 94545
      • Los Angeles, California, Соединенные Штаты, 90033
      • Oakland, California, Соединенные Штаты, 94611
      • Pleasant Hill, California, Соединенные Штаты, 94523
      • Roseville, California, Соединенные Штаты, 95661
      • Sacramento, California, Соединенные Штаты, 95817
      • Sacramento, California, Соединенные Штаты, 95825
      • San Francisco, California, Соединенные Штаты, 94115
      • San Jose, California, Соединенные Штаты, 95119
      • Santa Clara, California, Соединенные Штаты, 95051
      • South San Francisco, California, Соединенные Штаты, 94080
      • Vallejo, California, Соединенные Штаты, 94589
      • Walnut Creek, California, Соединенные Штаты, 94596
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, Соединенные Штаты, 80218
    • Connecticut
      • Stamford, Connecticut, Соединенные Штаты, 06902
      • Trumbull, Connecticut, Соединенные Штаты, 06611
    • Florida
      • Hollywood, Florida, Соединенные Штаты, 33021
      • Jacksonville, Florida, Соединенные Штаты, 32256
      • Miami, Florida, Соединенные Штаты, 33136
      • Port Saint Lucie, Florida, Соединенные Штаты, 34952
    • Idaho
      • Boise, Idaho, Соединенные Штаты, 83712
    • Illinois
      • Joliet, Illinois, Соединенные Штаты, 60435
      • Maywood, Illinois, Соединенные Штаты, 60153
      • Peoria, Illinois, Соединенные Штаты, 61615
    • Indiana
      • Goshen, Indiana, Соединенные Штаты, 46526
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, Соединенные Штаты, 46237
      • Terre Haute, Indiana, Соединенные Штаты, 47802
    • Kansas
      • Fairway, Kansas, Соединенные Штаты, 66205
    • Kentucky
      • Elizabethtown, Kentucky, Соединенные Штаты, 42791
    • Maine
      • Scarborough, Maine, Соединенные Штаты, 04074
    • Massachusetts
      • Burlington, Massachusetts, Соединенные Штаты, 01805
    • Montana
      • Billings, Montana, Соединенные Штаты, 59102
    • Nebraska
      • Lincoln, Nebraska, Соединенные Штаты, 68506
    • New Jersey
      • Cherry Hill, New Jersey, Соединенные Штаты, 08003
      • Manasquan, New Jersey, Соединенные Штаты, 08736
    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, Соединенные Штаты, 87131-5636
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, Соединенные Штаты, 87106
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, Соединенные Штаты, 87110
      • Farmington, New Mexico, Соединенные Штаты, 87401
      • Las Cruces, New Mexico, Соединенные Штаты, 88011
      • Santa Fe, New Mexico, Соединенные Штаты, 87505
    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, Соединенные Штаты, 14642
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, Соединенные Штаты, 27710
      • Greensboro, North Carolina, Соединенные Штаты, 27403
      • High Point, North Carolina, Соединенные Штаты, 27262
      • Washington, North Carolina, Соединенные Штаты, 27889
      • Winston-salem, North Carolina, Соединенные Штаты, 27103
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, Соединенные Штаты, 43219
      • Toledo, Ohio, Соединенные Штаты, 43623
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Соединенные Штаты, 73142
    • Pennsylvania
      • Dunmore, Pennsylvania, Соединенные Штаты, 18512
      • Media, Pennsylvania, Соединенные Штаты, 19063
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Соединенные Штаты, 19107
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Соединенные Штаты, 15212
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, Соединенные Штаты, 29414
    • Texas
      • Corpus Christi, Texas, Соединенные Штаты, 78404
      • Houston, Texas, Соединенные Штаты, 77090
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, Соединенные Штаты, 53792
      • Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, Соединенные Штаты, 53226
  • Швейцария
      • Aarau, Швейцария, 5000
      • Basel, Швейцария, 4031
      • Luzern, Швейцария, 6004
      • Zürich, Швейцария, 8063
  • Эстония
      • Tallinn, Эстония, 13419
      • Tartu, Эстония, 51014

Критерии участия

Исследователи ищут людей, которые соответствуют определенному описанию, называемому критериям приемлемости. Некоторыми примерами этих критериев являются общее состояние здоровья человека или предшествующее лечение.

Критерии приемлемости

Возраст, подходящий для обучения

18 лет и старше (Взрослый, Пожилой взрослый)

Принимает здоровых добровольцев

Нет

Полы, имеющие право на обучение

Все

Описание

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed colorectal cancer (CRC) with at least one measurable metastatic lesion by RECIST Version 1.1
  • Archival tumor tissue sample must be requested and available prior to study entry. If no archival tumor tissue sample is available, a fresh biopsy tissue sample must be obtained but should be discussed first with the medical monitor. A copy of the local pathology report must be submitted along with the specimens.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
  • Participants with treated brain metastases are eligible for study participation. Participants may not receive ongoing treatment with steroids at Screening. Anticonvulsants (at stable dose) are allowed. Treatment for brain metastases may be whole-brain radiotherapy, radiosurgery, neurosurgery, or a combination as deemed appropriate by the treating physician. Radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery must be completed at least 28 days prior to randomization.
  • Female participants should not be pregnant or breastfeeding. Female participants with childbearing potential should agree to use effective, non-hormonal means of contraception during the study and for a period of at least 6 months following the last administration of study drugs. Female participants with an intact uterus (unless amenorrheic for the last 24 months) must have a negative serum pregnancy test within 7 days prior to randomization into the study.
  • Male participants must agree to use effective contraception during the study and for a period of at least 6 months following the last administration of study drugs, even if they have been surgically sterilized.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any prior systemic treatment for mCRC
  • Adjuvant chemotherapy for CRC completed <12 months
  • Evidence of Gilbert's syndrome or of homozygosity for the UGT1A1*28 allele
  • Known positivity for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
  • Malignancies other than mCRC within 5 years prior to randomization, except for adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix, basal or squamous cell skin cancer, localized prostate cancer treated surgically with curative intent, and ductal carcinoma in situ treated surgically with curative intent
  • Radiotherapy to any site for any reason within 28 days prior to randomization, except for palliative radiotherapy to bone lesions within 14 days prior to randomization
  • Clinically detectable third-space fluid collections that cannot be controlled by drainage or other procedures prior to study entry
  • Treatment with any other investigational agent, or participation in another investigational drug trial within 28 days prior to randomization

Учебный план

В этом разделе представлена ​​подробная информация о плане исследования, в том числе о том, как планируется исследование и что оно измеряет.

Как устроено исследование?

Детали дизайна

  • Основная цель: Уход
  • Распределение: Рандомизированный
  • Интервенционная модель: Параллельное назначение
  • Маскировка: Нет (открытая этикетка)

Оружие и интервенции

Группа участников / Армия
Вмешательство/лечение
Экспериментальный: Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6
Participants will receive bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 by intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Participants may be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to oxaliplatin, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles.
Лекарство: 5-Fluorouracil
5-Fluorouracil 400 milligrams per meter-squared (mg/m^2) by IV bolus and subsequent 2400 mg/m^2 by IV infusion over 46 hours will be administered every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Лекарство: Bevacizumab
Bevacizumab 5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) of body weight via IV infusion will be administered every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. If participants are discontinued from oxaliplatin or irinotecan due to unacceptable toxicity, bevacizumab may be given in 3-week cycles with capecitabine.
Другие имена:
  • Авастин
Лекарство: Leucovorin
Leucovorin 400 mg/m^2 or dose deemed appropriate by Investigator via IV infusion over 2 hours will be administered every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Лекарство: Oxaliplatin
Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m^2 via IV infusion over 2 hours will be administered every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Лекарство: Capecitabine
Capecitabine 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 may be offered in the event of unacceptable toxicity to oxaliplatin or irinotecan, to be given orally twice a day on Days 1 to 14 in 3-week cycles.
Экспериментальный: Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI
Participants will receive bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI by IV infusion on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Participants may be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to irinotecan, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles.
Лекарство: 5-Fluorouracil
5-Fluorouracil 400 milligrams per meter-squared (mg/m^2) by IV bolus and subsequent 2400 mg/m^2 by IV infusion over 46 hours will be administered every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Лекарство: Bevacizumab
Bevacizumab 5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) of body weight via IV infusion will be administered every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. If participants are discontinued from oxaliplatin or irinotecan due to unacceptable toxicity, bevacizumab may be given in 3-week cycles with capecitabine.
Другие имена:
  • Авастин
Лекарство: Leucovorin
Leucovorin 400 mg/m^2 or dose deemed appropriate by Investigator via IV infusion over 2 hours will be administered every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Лекарство: Capecitabine
Capecitabine 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 may be offered in the event of unacceptable toxicity to oxaliplatin or irinotecan, to be given orally twice a day on Days 1 to 14 in 3-week cycles.
Лекарство: Irinotecan
Irinotecan 180 mg/m^2 via IV infusion over 2 hours will be administered every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Что измеряет исследование?

Первичные показатели результатов

Мера результата
Мера Описание
Временное ограничение
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1
Временное ограничение: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as greater than or equal to (≥) 20 percent (%) increase in sum of largest diameters (LD) of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 millimeters (mm). Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels
Временное ограничение: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Временное ограничение: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Временное ограничение: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels
Временное ограничение: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Вторичные показатели результатов

Мера результата
Мера Описание
Временное ограничение
PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 and High VEGF-A Levels
Временное ограничение: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 and Low VEGF-A Levels
Временное ограничение: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 and High VEGF-A Levels
Временное ограничение: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 and Low VEGF-A Levels
Временное ограничение: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Overall Survival (OS)
Временное ограничение: From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)
OS in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels
Временное ограничение: From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)
OS in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Временное ограничение: From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)
OS in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Временное ограничение: From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1
Временное ограничение: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Objective response was defined as complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to less than (<) 10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels
Временное ограничение: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Objective response was defined as CR or PR according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Временное ограничение: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Objective response was defined as CR or PR according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Временное ограничение: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Objective response was defined as CR or PR according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1
Временное ограничение: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Disease control was defined as CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression (≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions plus absolute increase ≥5 mm) in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study. The percentage of participants with CR, PR, or SD was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels
Временное ограничение: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Disease control was defined as CR, PR, or SD according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression (≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions plus absolute increase ≥5 mm) in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study. The percentage of participants with CR, PR, or SD was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Временное ограничение: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Disease control was defined as CR, PR, or SD according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression (≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions plus absolute increase ≥5 mm) in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study. The percentage of participants with CR, PR, or SD was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Временное ограничение: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Disease control was defined as CR, PR, or SD according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression (≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions plus absolute increase ≥5 mm) in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study. The percentage of participants with CR, PR, or SD was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection
Временное ограничение: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. R1 was defined as the presence of exposed tumor or histologically detected tumor cells at the line of transection, or <1 mm microscopic margins. In the case of use of radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy, the resection was considered as R1. R2 was defined as macroscopic positive margins or incomplete resection at time of surgery. The percentage of participants with resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection
Временное ограничение: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. The percentage of participants with R0 resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels
Временное ограничение: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. R1 was defined as the presence of exposed tumor or histologically detected tumor cells at the line of transection, or <1 mm microscopic margins. In the case of use of radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy, the resection was considered as R1. R2 was defined as macroscopic positive margins or incomplete resection at time of surgery. The percentage of participants with resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels
Временное ограничение: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. The percentage of participants with R0 resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Временное ограничение: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. R1 was defined as the presence of exposed tumor or histologically detected tumor cells at the line of transection, or <1 mm microscopic margins. In the case of use of radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy, the resection was considered as R1. R2 was defined as macroscopic positive margins or incomplete resection at time of surgery. The percentage of participants with resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Временное ограничение: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. The percentage of participants with R0 resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Временное ограничение: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. R1 was defined as the presence of exposed tumor or histologically detected tumor cells at the line of transection, or <1 mm microscopic margins. In the case of use of radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy, the resection was considered as R1. R2 was defined as macroscopic positive margins or incomplete resection at time of surgery. The percentage of participants with resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Временное ограничение: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. The percentage of participants with R0 resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Wild-Type V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS) Versus Participants With Mutant KRAS
Временное ограничение: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
OS in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels
Временное ограничение: From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)
OS in Participants With Wild-Type KRAS Versus Participants With Mutant KRAS
Временное ограничение: From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels
Временное ограничение: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Objective response was defined as CR or PR according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Wild-Type KRAS Versus Participants With Mutant KRAS
Временное ограничение: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Objective response was defined as CR or PR according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels
Временное ограничение: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Disease control was defined as CR, PR, or SD according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression (≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions plus absolute increase ≥5 mm) in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study. The percentage of participants with CR, PR, or SD was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels
Временное ограничение: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. R1 was defined as the presence of exposed tumor or histologically detected tumor cells at the line of transection, or <1 mm microscopic margins. In the case of use of radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy, the resection was considered as R1. R2 was defined as macroscopic positive margins or incomplete resection at time of surgery. The percentage of participants with resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels
Временное ограничение: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. The percentage of participants with R0 resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Соавторы и исследователи

Здесь вы найдете людей и организации, участвующие в этом исследовании.

Спонсор

Genentech, Inc.

Следователи

  • Директор по исследованиям: Christiane Langer, M.D., Genentech, Inc.

Даты записи исследования

Эти даты отслеживают ход отправки отчетов об исследованиях и сводных результатов на сайт ClinicalTrials.gov. Записи исследований и сообщаемые результаты проверяются Национальной медицинской библиотекой (NLM), чтобы убедиться, что они соответствуют определенным стандартам контроля качества, прежде чем публиковать их на общедоступном веб-сайте.

Изучение основных дат

Начало исследования

1 августа 2011 г.

Первичное завершение (Действительный)

1 мая 2015 г.

Завершение исследования (Действительный)

1 июля 2015 г.

Даты регистрации исследования

Первый отправленный

14 июня 2011 г.

Впервые представлено, что соответствует критериям контроля качества

15 июня 2011 г.

Первый опубликованный (Оценивать)

16 июня 2011 г.

Обновления учебных записей

Последнее опубликованное обновление (Оценивать)

11 августа 2016 г.

Последнее отправленное обновление, отвечающее критериям контроля качества

30 июня 2016 г.

Последняя проверка

1 июня 2016 г.

Дополнительная информация

Термины, связанные с этим исследованием

Дополнительные соответствующие термины MeSH

Другие идентификационные номера исследования

  • ML25710
  • 2011-004755-39 (Номер EudraCT)

Эта информация была получена непосредственно с веб-сайта clinicaltrials.gov без каких-либо изменений. Если у вас есть запросы на изменение, удаление или обновление сведений об исследовании, обращайтесь по адресу register@clinicaltrials.gov. Как только изменение будет реализовано на clinicaltrials.gov, оно будет автоматически обновлено и на нашем веб-сайте. .

Клинические исследования 5-Fluorouracil

Искать похожие исследования

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

CROs by country

CROs in Guinea

Заболевания

Редкие заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Пищевые добавки

Спонсор / Соавторы

Места

Подписаться