此页面是自动翻译的，不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Foster 100/6 mg NEXThaler 与 Foster 100/6mg 加压定量吸入器 (pMDI) 在受控哮喘患者中的比较。 (FORTUNE)

2026年6月24日 更新者：Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.

一项为期 12 周、多中心、随机、双盲、双模拟、2 臂平行组研究，比较 Foster 100/6mg NEXThaler、2 次吸入 b.i.d 与 Foster 100/6mg pMDI、2 次吸入 b.i.d 的疗效和安全性控制哮喘的患者

本研究的目的是证明 Foster 100/6mg NEXThaler 与 Foster 100/6mg pMDI 在哮喘患者肺功能方面的非劣效性，以及试验治疗在额外肺功能参数和临床结果测量。 目的还在于评估安全性和耐受性。

研究概览

地位

地位

指示当前招聘状态或扩展访问状态。
完全的

条件

条件

正在研究的疾病、紊乱、综合征、疾病或损伤。在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上，条件还可能包括其他与健康相关的问题，例如寿命、生活质量和健康风险。

干预/治疗

干预/治疗

作为临床研究重点的过程或行动。干预措施包括药物、医疗设备、程序、疫苗和其他处于研究阶段或已经可用的产品。干预措施还可以包括非侵入性方法，例如教育或调整饮食和锻炼。

详细说明

This was a phase III, multinational, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-control, 2-arm parallel group study designed to evaluate the non-inferiority of Foster® NEXThaler® 100/6 µg (400/24 µg/day) versus Foster® pMDI 100/6 µg (400/24 µg/day) in patients with controlled asthma.

The study included the following phases:

  • Pre-Screening Phase (Visit 0): Conducted within a maximum of 7 days before the screening visit (Visit 1), this phase provided patients with study details, obtained informed consent, and outlined medication restrictions.
  • Screening and Run-in Phase (Visit 1, Week -4 to Visit 2, Week -2): Patients underwent eligibility assessments and transitioned into a 4-week open-label run-in period with Foster® pMDI 100/6 µg (400/24 µg/day) to establish baseline parameters.
  • Randomisation Phase (Visit 3, Week 0): Eligible patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Foster® NEXThaler® 100/6 µg 2 inhalations bid (for a total daily dose of 400/24 µg/day) or Foster® pMDI 100/6 µg, 2 puffs bid (for a total daily dose of 400/24 µg/day) for 12 weeks. The allocation was managed via an Interactive Web Response System (IWRS) to ensure balanced treatment groups.
  • Investigational Phase (Treatment Period: Weeks 0-12): Patients attended scheduled visits at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 to monitor efficacy and safety.

Daily, patients recorded pre-dose morning and evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF), rescue medication use, and asthma symptoms using an electronic peak flow meter and e-diary. At each visit, lung function (FEV1, FVC, and PEF), asthma symptom scores, and rescue medication use were assessed. Vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure) and safety outcomes (adverse events, serious adverse events, and laboratory assessments) were monitored.

  • Follow-Up Phase: A safety follow-up phone call was conducted 7-10 days after the final visit (Week 12) or early termination to assess any unresolved adverse events (AEs) or new concomitant medications.

The total study duration per participant was 16 weeks, including the 4-week run-in period, 12-week treatment phase, and 1-week follow-up. This design ensured a standardized baseline before randomisation and provided sufficient time to assess both primary and secondary endpoints.

Salbutamol (purchased locally and provided by the Investigator site to the patient) was used as a rescue medication.

研究类型

研究类型

描述临床研究的性质。研究类型包括介入性研究（也称为临床试验）、观察性研究（包括患者登记）和扩展访问。
介入性

注册 (实际的)

注册

临床研究的参与者人数。 “预期”入组人数是研究人员进行研究所需的目标参与者人数。
494

阶段

阶段

根据美国食品和药物管理局 (FDA) 制定的定义，研究药物或生物制品的临床试验阶段。阶段基于研究的目标、参与者的数量和其他特征。有五个阶段：早期第 1 阶段（以前列为第 0 阶段）、第 1 阶段、第 2 阶段、第 3 阶段和第 4 阶段。不适用用于描述没有 FDA 定义的阶段的试验，包括设备试验或行为干预。
  • 第三阶段

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

  • 中国
      • Beijing、中国、100144
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15672
      • Beijing、中国
        • Chiesi clinical Trial site 15636
      • Chongqing、中国
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15638
      • Guizhou、中国
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15670
      • Hebei、中国
        • Chiesi clinical Trial Site 15611
      • Jilin City、中国
        • Chiesi Clinical trial site 15660
      • Shanghai、中国
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15628
      • Shanghai、中国
        • Chiesi clinical trial site 15637
      • Shenzhen、中国
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15666
      • Sichuan、中国
        • Chiesi clinical Trial site 15633
      • Ürümqi、中国、830054
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15669
    • Anhui
      • Hefei、Anhui、中国
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15641
    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing、Beijing Municipality、中国、100000
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15682
      • Beijing、Beijing Municipality、中国、101100
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15663
    • Guangdong
      • Foshan、Guangdong、中国
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15662
      • Guangzhou、Guangdong、中国、5100150
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15671
      • Guangzhou、Guangdong、中国、510120
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15610
      • Guangzhou、Guangdong、中国
        • Chiesi clinical Trial site 15656
      • Guangzhou、Guangdong、中国
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15668
      • Huizhou、Guangdong、中国、516001
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15677
      • Shenzhen、Guangdong、中国、518052
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15683
      • Shenzhen、Guangdong、中国
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15608
      • Zhanjiang、Guangdong、中国、524001
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15607
    • Guangzhou
      • Guangzhou、Guangzhou、中国、511400
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15610
    • Hainan
      • Haikou、Hainan、中国、570208
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15673
    • Heilongjiang
      • Qiqihar、Heilongjiang、中国、161002
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15678
    • Henan
      • Xinxiang、Henan、中国、453000
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15681
      • Zhengzhou、Henan、中国、450003
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15679
    • Hubei
      • Wuhan、Hubei、中国、430030
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15614
      • Wuhan、Hubei、中国
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15661
    • Hunan
      • Hengyang、Hunan、中国、421000
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15675
    • Jiangsu
      • Changzhou、Jiangsu、中国、213164
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15643
    • Jiangxi
      • Pingxiang、Jiangxi、中国、337055
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15674
    • Jilin
      • Jilin City、Jilin、中国、132011
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15676
    • Liaoning
      • Shenyang、Liaoning、中国
        • Chiesi clinical Trial site 15621
    • Nanchang
      • Nanchang、Nanchang、中国、330006
        • Chiesi clinical Trial site 15619
    • Neimenggu
      • Hohhot、Neimenggu、中国、010017
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15650
      • Hohhot、Neimenggu、中国
        • Chiesi clinical Trial site 15659
    • Shanghai Municipality
      • Shanghai、Shanghai Municipality、中国、200025
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15630
      • Shanghai、Shanghai Municipality、中国、200050
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15664
      • Shanghai、Shanghai Municipality、中国、201100
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15654
      • Shanghai、Shanghai Municipality、中国
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15630
      • Shanghai、Shanghai Municipality、中国
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15631
      • Shanghai、Shanghai Municipality、中国
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15665
    • Shanxi
      • Taiyuan、Shanxi、中国、030001
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15625
    • Shijiazhuang
      • Shijiazhuang、Shijiazhuang、中国、050000
        • Chiesi clinical Trial Site 15611
    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu、Sichuan、中国、610041
        • Chiesi clinical Trial site 15633
      • Chongqing、Sichuan、中国、408499
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15680
    • Tianjin Municipality
      • Tianjin、Tianjin Municipality、中国、300052
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15642
      • Tianjin、Tianjin Municipality、中国、300350
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15634
    • Xian
      • Xi'an、Xian、中国、710061
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15626

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

资格标准

想要参加临床研究的人必须满足的关键要求或他们必须具备的特征。资格标准包括纳入标准（一个人参与研究所必需的）和排除标准（阻止一个人参与）。资格标准的类型包括一项研究是否接受健康志愿者、是否有年龄或年龄组要求，或是否受性别限制。

适合学习的年龄

18年 及以上 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

不

描述

纳入标准：

  • 根据 2016 年全球倡议哮喘 (GINA) 更新版国际指南，年龄 >18 岁的华裔男性或女性门诊患者在就诊前至少 6 个月被临床诊断为哮喘 1 并由胸科医生确认。
  • 对可逆性测试的积极响应。
  • FEV 1（第一秒内用力呼气量）> 支气管扩张剂适当清除后预测正常值的 80%。
  • 患者在访问 1 之前接受过至少 3 个月稳定剂量的常规治疗，每日服用高剂量 ICS（吸入皮质类固醇）或服用每日中剂量 ICS

排除标准：

  • 怀孕或哺乳期妇女
  • 间歇性哮喘或仅在偶发性接触过敏原或化学致敏物时发生的哮喘
  • 根据 2016 年更新的当前全球慢性阻塞性肺病倡议 (GOLD) 指南定义的慢性阻塞性肺病 (COPD) 的诊断
  • 当前吸烟者或戒烟者
  • 入组前 1 个月内导致全身性皮质类固醇摄入（> 10 天）的严重哮喘发作或中度/重度哮喘发作
  • 接受单克隆抗体治疗的患者
  • 接受非保钾利尿剂治疗的患者
  • 接受单胺氧化酶抑制剂和三环类抗抑郁药治疗的患者
  • 正在接受可能与类固醇相互作用的治疗的患者

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的？

设计细节

  • 主要用途：治疗
  • 分配：随机化
  • 介入模型：并行分配
  • 屏蔽：四人间

武器和干预

参与者组/臂

参与者组/臂

根据试验方案，接受特定干预/治疗或不接受干预的临床试验参与者组或亚组。
干预/治疗

干预/治疗

作为临床研究重点的过程或行动。干预措施包括药物、医疗设备、程序、疫苗和其他处于研究阶段或已经可用的产品。干预措施还可以包括非侵入性方法，例如教育或调整饮食和锻炼。
实验性的：Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler

Patients in this arm received Foster® NEXThaler® 100/6 µg, a fixed-dose combination of beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) 100 µg and formoterol fumarate (FF) 6 µg per actuation, delivered via a breath-actuated dry powder inhaler (DPI).

Treatment Details:

  • Dosage: 2 inhalations twice daily (b.i.d.), totaling 400/24 µg BDP/FF daily.
  • Duration: 12 weeks.
  • Administration: First dose under medical supervision at randomization (Week 0).

Blinding & Control Treatment:

  • A double-dummy design was used. Patients also received a placebo pMDI (matching active pMDI), administered as 2 puffs b.i.d. to maintain blinding.

Background Therapy:

  • Salbutamol was provided as rescue medication.

Patient Training & Compliance:

  • Inhaler use was assessed at visits, with retraining as needed; patients used an AeroChamber Plus™ spacer if necessary, and each inhaler was labeled with "sun" (morning) and "moon" (evening) stickers.
药品：Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler
A fixed combination of beclometasone dipropionate 100 µg and formoterol fumarate 6 µg per actuation, delivered via a breath-actuated dry powder inhaler (DPI).
其他名称：
  • beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) 100 µg / formoterol fumarate (FF) 6 µg NEXThealer
有源比较器：Foster 100/6µg pMDI

Patients in this arm received Foster® pMDI 100/6 µg, a fixed-dose combination of beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) 100 µg and formoterol fumarate (FF) 6 µg per actuation, delivered via a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI).

Treatment Details:

  • Dosage: 2 puffs twice daily (b.i.d.), totaling 400/24 µg BDP/FF daily.
  • Duration: 12 weeks.
  • Administration: First dose under medical supervision at randomization (Week 0).

Blinding & Control Treatment:

  • A double-dummy design was used. Patients also received a placebo DPI (matching active DPI), administered as 2 inhalations b.i.d. to maintain blinding.

Background Therapy:

  • Salbutamol was provided as rescue medication.

Patient Training & Compliance:

  • Inhaler use was assessed at visits, with retraining as needed; patients used an AeroChamber Plus™ spacer if necessary, and each inhaler was labeled with "sun" (morning) and "moon" (evening) stickers.
药品：Foster 100/6µg pMDI
A fixed combination of beclometasone dipropionate 100 µg and formoterol fumarate 6 µg per actuation, delivered via a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) with HFA_134a propellant.
其他名称：
  • beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) 100µg / formoterol fumarate (FF) 6µg pMDI

研究衡量的是什么？

主要结果指标

主要结果指标

在临床研究的方案中，对于评估干预/治疗的效果最重要的计划结果测量。大多数临床研究有一项主要结果指标，但有些研究有不止一项。
结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period in Average Pre-dose Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)
大体时间：Baseline (Week 0, Visit 3) and Week 12 (EoT)

PEF= peak expiratory flow. The peak expiratory flow (also known as a peak flow or peak flow rate) is the maximal rate that a person can exhale during a short maximal expiratory effort after a full inspiration.

In this study PEF (L/min) was monitored twice daily using a portable electronic peak flow meter before medication intake: morning (7:00-9:00 am) and evening (7:00-9:00 pm). Each session required at least two blows, with the highest valid value recorded.

  • Baseline pre-dose morning PEF was calculated as the mean of all valid pre-dose morning Best PEF values from the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3).

  • The average pre-dose morning PEF over the entire treatment period was computed as:

    ∑Valid pre-dose morning Best PEF values (treatment period) / Number of days with available data

  • Valid pre-dose morning Best PEF values = Highest value recorded from at least two PEF measurements per session, within the range 50-900 L/min
Baseline (Week 0, Visit 3) and Week 12 (EoT)

次要结果测量

次要结果测量

在临床研究的方案中，计划的结果测量值在评估干预效果时不如主要结果测量值重要，但仍然值得关注。大多数临床研究有不止一项次要结果指标。
结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period in Average Pre-dose Morning Peek Expiratory Flow (PEF)
大体时间：Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT)

PEF (L/min) was monitored twice daily using a portable electronic peak flow meter before medication intake: in the morning (7:00-9:00 am) and evening (7:00-9:00 pm). Each session required at least two blows, with the highest valid value recorded.

  • Baseline pre-dose morning PEF was calculated as the mean of all valid pre-dose morning Best PEF values from the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3).

  • The average pre-dose morning PEF for each inter-visit period was computed as:

    ∑all valid pre-dose morning Best PEF values / number of days with available data

  • Valid pre-dose morning Best PEF values = Highest value recorded from at least two PEF measurements per session, within the range 50-900 L/min
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT)
Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Average Pre-dose Evening PEF
大体时间：Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks.

PEF (L/min) was monitored twice daily using a portable electronic peak flow meter before medication intake: morning (7:00-9:00 am) and evening (7:00-9:00 pm). Each session required at least two blows, with the highest valid value recorded.

  • Baseline pre-dose evening PEF was calculated as the mean of all valid pre-dose evening Best PEF values from the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3).

  • The average pre-dose evening PEF for each inter-visit period was computed as:

    ∑all valid pre-dose evening Best PEF values / number of days with available data

  • Valid pre-dose evening Best PEF values = Highest value recorded from at least two PEF measurements per session, within the range 50-900 L/min.
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks.
Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Daily PEF Variability
大体时间：Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks

PEF (L/min) was monitored twice daily using a portable electronic peak flow meter before medication intake: morning (7:00-9:00 am) and evening (7:00-9:00 pm). Each session required at least two blows, with the highest valid value recorded.

  • Baseline average daily PEF variability was calculated as the mean of all daily PEF variability values recorded in the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3).

  • The average daily PEF variability for each inter-visit period was computed as:

    ∑all daily PEF variability values / number of days with available data

  • Daily PEF variability was calculated only for days where both pre-dose morning Best PEF and pre-dose evening Best PEF values were available.
  • Valid Best PEF values were defined as the highest value recorded from at least two PEF measurements per session, within the range 50-900 L/min.
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks
Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Average Use of Rescue Medication (Number of Puffs/Day)
大体时间：Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks

Rescue medication use was recorded daily in an electronic diary, with puffs taken during the day recorded in the evening session and puffs taken at night recorded the next morning.

  • Baseline rescue medication use was the mean daily use over the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3).

  • Average daily use of rescue medication was calculated as:

    • all puffs per day / number of days with available data
  • It was assessed for each inter-visit period (from the evening of the clinic visit to the morning of the next visit) and over the entire treatment period (from the evening of the first treatment day to the morning of the last).
  • At least 7 valid days were required per period, with at least one evaluable inter-visit period needed for full analysis.
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks
Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Percentage of Rescue Medication-Free Days
大体时间：Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks

Rescue medication use was recorded daily in an electronic diary, with puffs taken during the day recorded in the evening session and puffs taken at night recorded the next morning.

  • Baseline percentage of rescue medication-free days was calculated over the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3).
  • Percentage of rescue medication-free days was calculated as:

(Number of days with no rescue medication use / Total number of days with available data)×100

  • It was assessed for each inter-visit period (from the evening of the clinic visit to the morning of the next visit) and over the entire treatment period (from the evening of the first treatment day to the morning of the last).
  • At least 7 valid days were required per period, with at least one evaluable inter-visit period needed for full analysis.
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks
Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Average Total Morning Asthma Symptom Score
大体时间：Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks

Asthma symptoms (cough, wheeze, chest tightness and breathlessness) were scored, always before PEF measurements, twice daily - daytime and nighttime - as follows:

Daytime asthma symptom score (ranging 0-3, where the lower the score the better the outcome):

0 No symptom

  1. Mild: symptoms not causing awakening
  2. Moderate: discomfort causing awakenings
  3. Severe: causing awakenings for most of the night / don't allow to sleep at all The average score of each symptom is the mean value of all measurements (recorded in the evening session, as per study methodology).

Total average Daily Asthma Symptoms score daytime = Σ(Cough daytime score + Wheeze daytime score + Chest Tightness daytime score + Breathlessness daytime score)/ Number of days with available data.

The average of daytime asthma symptoms is the mean value of all daytime measurements, ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 12 (maximum severity). The lower the score, the better the symptom.
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks
Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Average Total Evening Asthma Symptom Scores
大体时间：Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks

Asthma symptoms (cough, wheeze, chest tightness and breathlessness) were scored, always before PEF measurements, twice daily - daytime and nighttime - as follows:

Nighttime asthma symptom score (ranging 0-3, where the lower the score the better the outcome):

0 No symptom

  1. Mild: symptoms not causing awakening
  2. Moderate: discomfort causing awakenings
  3. Severe: causing awakenings for most of the night / don't allow to sleep at all The average score of each symptom is the mean value of all measurements (Recorded in the morning session of the next day).

Total average Daily Asthma Symptoms score nighttime = Σ(Cough nighttime score + Wheeze nighttime score + Chest Tightness nighttime score + Breathlessness nighttime score)/ Number of days with available data.

The average of nighttime asthma symptoms is the mean value of all nighttime measurements, ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 12 (maximum severity). The lower the score, the better the symptom.
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks
Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Percentage of Asthma Symptom-Free Days
大体时间：Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks

An asthma symptom-free day was defined as a day with both total morning and total evening asthma symptom scores = 0. Only days with both scores available were included.

  • Baseline percentage of symptom-free days was the mean percentage over the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3).
  • Percentage of asthma symptom-free days was calculated as:

(Number of symptom-free days / Total number of days with available data)×100

  • It was assessed for each inter-visit period (from the evening of the clinic visit to the morning of the next visit) and over the 12-week treatment period (from the evening of treatment start to the morning of treatment end).
  • At least 7 valid days were required per period, with at least one evaluable inter-visit period needed for full analysis.
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks
Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Percentage of Asthma Control Days
大体时间：Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks

An asthma control day was defined as a day without rescue medication use and with both total morning and total evening asthma symptom scores = 0. Only days with both scores available were included in the calculation.

  • Baseline percentage of asthma control days was the mean percentage over the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3).
  • Percentage of asthma control days was calculated as:

(Number of asthma control days / Total number of days with available data)×100

  • It was assessed for each inter-visit period (from the evening of the clinic visit to the morning of the next visit) and over the 12-week treatment period (from the evening of treatment start to the morning of treatment end).
  • At least 7 valid days were required per period, with at least one evaluable inter-visit period needed for full analysis.
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks
Change From Baseline in Pre-Dose Morning FEV1 at Each Clinic Visit
大体时间：Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT)

Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) was measured pre-dose in the morning (7:00-9:00 am) at each clinic visit using spirometry, following standardized procedures. Baseline FEV1 was recorded at Visit 3 (Week 0, randomization), and changes were assessed at each visit (Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12).

Patients performed spirometry in a seated position, using the same calibrated spirometer across all visits. They inhaled deeply to total lung capacity and exhaled forcefully and completely. At least three acceptable maneuvers were required, with the highest valid measurement recorded. FEV1 was expressed in liters (L), and a higher value indicated better lung function.
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT)
Change From Baseline in Pre-Dose Morning FVC at Each Clinic Visit
大体时间：Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT)

Forced vital capacity (FVC) is the maximum capacity of air that a patient can exhale after a maximum inspiration. It measures the volume of air exhaled in a spirometer, after a maximal inspiration. FVC was measured pre-dose in the morning (7:00-9:00 am) at each clinic visit using spirometry, following standardized procedures. Baseline FVC was recorded at Visit 3 (Week 0, randomization), and changes were assessed at each visit (Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12).

Patients performed spirometry in a seated position, ensuring consistency across visits. They were instructed to inhale deeply to full lung capacity and exhale forcefully and completely into the spirometer. At least three acceptable maneuvers were required per session, with the highest valid measurement recorded. The higher the capacity, measured in liters, the better the outcome.
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT)
Change From Baseline to Last Visit in ACQ-6 Score
大体时间：Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT)

The ACQ-6 was a validated questionnaire assessing asthma control, consisting of six items: five on asthma symptoms (nighttime waking, symptoms on waking, activity limitation, shortness of breath, wheezing) and one on rescue medication use, all self-administered. Each item was scored from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (maximum impairment), and the ACQ-6 total score was the mean of all six items, ranging from 0 (totally controlled asthma) to 6 (severely uncontrolled asthma). Hence, the higher the score, the worse the outcome.

Baseline ACQ-6 was assessed at Visit 3 (Week 0, randomization), and the final score was recorded at Visit 9 (Week 12, EOT). The change from baseline was calculated as the difference between these values .
Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT)
Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event (TEAE) or Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR)
大体时间：From Week 0 (Visit 3, Randomization) to Week 12 (Visit 9, EoT)

An adverse event (AE) was defined as "any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study patient administered a medicinal product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment". An AE could therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory finding), symptom or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.

An adverse drug reaction (ADR) was defined as an "untoward and unintended response to an investigational medicinal product related to any dose administered".

An SAE/serious ADR was defined as any untoward medical occurrence or effect that at any dose Resulted in death, Was life-threatening, Required hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, Resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, Was a congenital anomaly or birth defect, Was a medically significant AE.
From Week 0 (Visit 3, Randomization) to Week 12 (Visit 9, EoT)

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

赞助

赞助

发起研究并有权和控制研究的组织或个人。
Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.

调查人员

调查人员

参与临床研究的研究人员。相关术语包括中心首席研究员、中心副研究员、研究主席、研究主管和研究首席研究员。
  • 首席研究员：Jinping MD Zheng、The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

一般刊物

有用的网址

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

学习开始

第一位参与者参加临床研究的实际日期。 “预期”研究开始日期是研究人员认为将成为研究开始日期的日期。
2017年10月9日

初级完成 (实际的)

初级完成

临床研究的最后一名参与者接受检查或接受干预以收集主要结果测量的最终数据的日期。临床研究是否根据方案结束或被终止不影响该日期。对于具有多个不同完成日期的主要结果测量的临床研究，该术语是指完成所有主要结果测量的数据收集的日期。 “预期”主要完成日期是研究人员认为将成为研究主要完成日期的日期。
2021年12月28日

研究完成 (实际的)

研究完成

临床研究中最后一位参与者接受检查或接受干预/治疗以收集主要结局指标、次要结局指标和不良事件（即最后一位参与者的最后一次就诊）的最终数据的日期。 “预期”研究完成日期是研究人员认为将成为研究完成日期的日期。
2021年12月28日

研究注册日期

首次提交

首次提交

研究发起人或研究者首次向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录的日期。在首次提交日期和记录在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上的可用性（首次发布日期）之间通常会有几天的延迟。
2018年2月12日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

研究发起人或研究者首次提交符合国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 质量控制 (QC) 审查标准的研究记录的日期。在满足 NLM 的 QC 审查标准之前，发起人或研究者可能需要修改和提交研究记录一次或多次。申办者或研究者有责任确保研究记录符合 NLM QC 审查标准。
2018年2月26日

首次发布 (实际的)

首次发布

在国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 质量控制 (QC) 审查结束后，研究记录首次在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上可用的日期。研究发起人或研究者提交研究记录的日期与首次发布日期之间通常会有几天的延迟。
2018年3月5日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

最后更新发布

在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上提供研究记录更改的最近日期。研究发起人或研究者向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交变更的时间（最后更新提交日期）和最后更新发布日期之间可能会有延迟。
2026年8月10日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

研究发起人或研究者提交符合国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 质量控制 (QC) 审查标准的研究记录更改的最近日期。申办者或研究者有责任确保研究记录符合 NLM QC 审查标准。
2026年6月24日

最后验证

最后验证

研究发起人或研究者确认 ClinicalTrials.gov 上的临床研究信息准确且最新的最近日期。如果一项研究的招募状态为招募；尚未招聘；或活跃，未在过去 2 年内确认招募，该研究的招募状态显示为未知。
2026年6月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

关键字

其他相关的 MeSH 术语

其他研究编号

其他研究编号

由研究的发起人、资助者或其他人分配给临床研究的标识符或 ID 号，而不是 NCT 号。这些编号可能包括来自其他试验登记处的唯一标识符和美国国立卫生研究院的资助编号。
  • CCD-01535BA0-01
  • CTR20170917 (其他标识符：http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/)

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？

不

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.

Cookie设置

我们使用cookie来确保我们在您的网站上给您最好的体验。有关更多详细信息，请仔细阅读我们的隐私和Cookie政策。...>>>您可以按照政策中的说明，随时通过从网站或计算机中删除Cookie来更改首选项或撤回您的同意。请接受它，然后在下面的“管理设置”部分中勾选相应的框，选择您的偏好。在继续使用本网站的任何部分之前，请仔细阅读我们的服务条款。
«管理设定