Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Foster 100/6 mg NEXThaler versus Foster 100/6 mg inhalator med trykafmålt dosis (pMDI) hos patienter med kontrolleret astma. (FORTUNE)

24. juni 2026 opdateret af: Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.

En 12-ugers, multicenter, randomiseret, dobbeltblind, dobbeltdummy, 2-arm parallel gruppeundersøgelse, der sammenligner effektiviteten og sikkerheden af ​​Foster 100/6mg NEXThaler, 2 inhalationer b.i.d, Versus Foster 100/6mg pMDI, 2 pust b.i. Patienter med kontrolleret astma

Formålet med denne undersøgelse er at påvise non-inferioriteten af ​​Foster 100/6mg NEXThaler versus Foster 100/6mg pMDI med hensyn til lungefunktion hos astmatiske patienter, samt effekten af ​​testbehandlingerne i form af yderligere lungefunktionsparametre og kliniske resultatmål. Formålet er også at vurdere sikkerheden og tolerabiliteten.

Studieoversigt

Status

Status

Angiver den aktuelle rekrutteringsstatus eller den udvidede adgangsstatus.
Afsluttet

Betingelser

Betingelser

Den sygdom, lidelse, syndrom, sygdom eller skade, der undersøges. På ClinicalTrials.gov kan tilstande også omfatte andre sundhedsrelaterede problemer, såsom levetid, livskvalitet og sundhedsrisici.

Intervention / Behandling

Intervention / Behandling

En proces eller handling, der er i fokus for en klinisk undersøgelse. Interventioner omfatter lægemidler, medicinsk udstyr, procedurer, vacciner og andre produkter, der enten er til undersøgelse eller allerede er tilgængelige. Interventioner kan også omfatte ikke-invasive tilgange, såsom uddannelse eller ændring af kost og motion.

Detaljeret beskrivelse

This was a phase III, multinational, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-control, 2-arm parallel group study designed to evaluate the non-inferiority of Foster® NEXThaler® 100/6 µg (400/24 µg/day) versus Foster® pMDI 100/6 µg (400/24 µg/day) in patients with controlled asthma.

The study included the following phases:

  • Pre-Screening Phase (Visit 0): Conducted within a maximum of 7 days before the screening visit (Visit 1), this phase provided patients with study details, obtained informed consent, and outlined medication restrictions.
  • Screening and Run-in Phase (Visit 1, Week -4 to Visit 2, Week -2): Patients underwent eligibility assessments and transitioned into a 4-week open-label run-in period with Foster® pMDI 100/6 µg (400/24 µg/day) to establish baseline parameters.
  • Randomisation Phase (Visit 3, Week 0): Eligible patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Foster® NEXThaler® 100/6 µg 2 inhalations bid (for a total daily dose of 400/24 µg/day) or Foster® pMDI 100/6 µg, 2 puffs bid (for a total daily dose of 400/24 µg/day) for 12 weeks. The allocation was managed via an Interactive Web Response System (IWRS) to ensure balanced treatment groups.
  • Investigational Phase (Treatment Period: Weeks 0-12): Patients attended scheduled visits at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 to monitor efficacy and safety.

Daily, patients recorded pre-dose morning and evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF), rescue medication use, and asthma symptoms using an electronic peak flow meter and e-diary. At each visit, lung function (FEV1, FVC, and PEF), asthma symptom scores, and rescue medication use were assessed. Vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure) and safety outcomes (adverse events, serious adverse events, and laboratory assessments) were monitored.

  • Follow-Up Phase: A safety follow-up phone call was conducted 7-10 days after the final visit (Week 12) or early termination to assess any unresolved adverse events (AEs) or new concomitant medications.

The total study duration per participant was 16 weeks, including the 4-week run-in period, 12-week treatment phase, and 1-week follow-up. This design ensured a standardized baseline before randomisation and provided sufficient time to assess both primary and secondary endpoints.

Salbutamol (purchased locally and provided by the Investigator site to the patient) was used as a rescue medication.

Undersøgelsestype

Undersøgelsestype

Beskriver karakteren af ​​en klinisk undersøgelse. Undersøgelsestyper omfatter interventionelle undersøgelser (også kaldet kliniske forsøg), observationsundersøgelser (herunder patientregistre) og udvidet adgang.
Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

Tilmelding

Antallet af deltagere i en klinisk undersøgelse. Den "forventede" tilmelding er det mål for antallet af deltagere, som forskerne skal bruge til undersøgelsen.
494

Fase

Fase

Stadiet af et klinisk forsøg, der studerer et lægemiddel eller et biologisk produkt, baseret på definitioner udviklet af U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Fasen tager udgangspunkt i undersøgelsens formål, antallet af deltagere og andre karakteristika. Der er fem faser: Tidlig fase 1 (tidligere opført som fase 0), fase 1, fase 2, fase 3 og fase 4. Ikke relevant bruges til at beskrive forsøg uden FDA-definerede faser, herunder forsøg med enheder eller adfærdsmæssige indgreb.
  • Fase 3

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

  • Kina
      • Beijing, Kina, 100144
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15672
      • Beijing, Kina
        • Chiesi clinical Trial site 15636
      • Chongqing, Kina
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15638
      • Guizhou, Kina
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15670
      • Hebei, Kina
        • Chiesi clinical Trial Site 15611
      • Jilin City, Kina
        • Chiesi Clinical trial site 15660
      • Shanghai, Kina
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15628
      • Shanghai, Kina
        • Chiesi clinical trial site 15637
      • Shenzhen, Kina
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15666
      • Sichuan, Kina
        • Chiesi clinical Trial site 15633
      • Ürümqi, Kina, 830054
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15669
    • Anhui
      • Hefei, Anhui, Kina
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15641
    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, Kina, 100000
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15682
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, Kina, 101100
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15663
    • Guangdong
      • Foshan, Guangdong, Kina
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15662
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, Kina, 5100150
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15671
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, Kina, 510120
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15610
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, Kina
        • Chiesi clinical Trial site 15656
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, Kina
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15668
      • Huizhou, Guangdong, Kina, 516001
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15677
      • Shenzhen, Guangdong, Kina, 518052
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15683
      • Shenzhen, Guangdong, Kina
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15608
      • Zhanjiang, Guangdong, Kina, 524001
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15607
    • Guangzhou
      • Guangzhou, Guangzhou, Kina, 511400
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15610
    • Hainan
      • Haikou, Hainan, Kina, 570208
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15673
    • Heilongjiang
      • Qiqihar, Heilongjiang, Kina, 161002
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15678
    • Henan
      • Xinxiang, Henan, Kina, 453000
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15681
      • Zhengzhou, Henan, Kina, 450003
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15679
    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, Kina, 430030
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15614
      • Wuhan, Hubei, Kina
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15661
    • Hunan
      • Hengyang, Hunan, Kina, 421000
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15675
    • Jiangsu
      • Changzhou, Jiangsu, Kina, 213164
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15643
    • Jiangxi
      • Pingxiang, Jiangxi, Kina, 337055
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15674
    • Jilin
      • Jilin City, Jilin, Kina, 132011
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15676
    • Liaoning
      • Shenyang, Liaoning, Kina
        • Chiesi clinical Trial site 15621
    • Nanchang
      • Nanchang, Nanchang, Kina, 330006
        • Chiesi clinical Trial site 15619
    • Neimenggu
      • Hohhot, Neimenggu, Kina, 010017
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15650
      • Hohhot, Neimenggu, Kina
        • Chiesi clinical Trial site 15659
    • Shanghai Municipality
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, Kina, 200025
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15630
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, Kina, 200050
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15664
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, Kina, 201100
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15654
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, Kina
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15630
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, Kina
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15631
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, Kina
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15665
    • Shanxi
      • Taiyuan, Shanxi, Kina, 030001
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15625
    • Shijiazhuang
      • Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang, Kina, 050000
        • Chiesi clinical Trial Site 15611
    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, Kina, 610041
        • Chiesi clinical Trial site 15633
      • Chongqing, Sichuan, Kina, 408499
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15680
    • Tianjin Municipality
      • Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, Kina, 300052
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15642
      • Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, Kina, 300350
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15634
    • Xian
      • Xi'an, Xian, Kina, 710061
        • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15626

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Berettigelseskriterier

De nøglekrav, som personer, der ønsker at deltage i et klinisk studie, skal opfylde eller de egenskaber, de skal have. Kvalifikationskriterier består af både inklusionskriterier (som er nødvendige for at en person kan deltage i undersøgelsen) og eksklusionskriterier (som forhindrer en person i at deltage). Typer af berettigelseskriterier omfatter, om en undersøgelse accepterer raske frivillige, har alders- eller aldersgruppekrav eller er begrænset af køn.

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år og ældre (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Beskrivelse

Inklusionskriterier:

  • Mandlige eller kvindelige ambulante patienter, kinesisk etnicitet i alderen >18 år med en klinisk diagnose astma i minimum 6 måneder før besøg 1 bekræftet af en thoraxlæge i henhold til internationale retningslinjer opdateret 2016 Global Initiative Asthma (GINA).
  • Positiv respons på reversibilitetstest.
  • FEV 1 (Forced Expiratory Volume indenfor det første sekund) >80 % af den forudsagte normale værdi efter passende udvaskning fra bronkodilatatorer.
  • Patienter i tidligere regelmæssig behandling med en stabil dosis i mindst 3 måneder før besøg 1 med enten høj daglig dosis af ICS (inhalerede kortikosteroider) eller medium daglig dosis af ICS

Ekskluderingskriterier:

  • Gravide eller ammende kvinder
  • Intermitterende astma eller astma, der kun forekommer på grund af episodisk eksponering for et allergen eller en kemisk sensibilisator
  • Diagnose af kronisk obstruktiv lungesygdom (KOL) som defineret af de nuværende retningslinjer for Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) opdateret 2016
  • Nuværende rygere eller tidligere rygere
  • Alvorlig astmaeksacerbation, der fører til indtagelse af systemiske kortikosteroider (> 10 dage) inden for 1 måned før inklusion eller moderate/svære astmaeksacerbationer
  • Patienter behandlet med monoklonale antistoffer
  • Patienter behandlet med ikke-kaliumbesparende diuretika
  • Patienter behandlet med monoaminoxidasehæmmere og tricykliske antidepressiva
  • Patienter, der modtager behandling, der kunne interagere med steroider

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Firedobbelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm

Deltagergruppe / Arm

En gruppe eller undergruppe af deltagere i et klinisk forsøg, der modtager en specifik intervention/behandling eller ingen intervention i henhold til forsøgets protokol.
Intervention / Behandling

Intervention / Behandling

En proces eller handling, der er i fokus for en klinisk undersøgelse. Interventioner omfatter lægemidler, medicinsk udstyr, procedurer, vacciner og andre produkter, der enten er til undersøgelse eller allerede er tilgængelige. Interventioner kan også omfatte ikke-invasive tilgange, såsom uddannelse eller ændring af kost og motion.
Eksperimentel: Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler

Patients in this arm received Foster® NEXThaler® 100/6 µg, a fixed-dose combination of beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) 100 µg and formoterol fumarate (FF) 6 µg per actuation, delivered via a breath-actuated dry powder inhaler (DPI).

Treatment Details:

  • Dosage: 2 inhalations twice daily (b.i.d.), totaling 400/24 µg BDP/FF daily.
  • Duration: 12 weeks.
  • Administration: First dose under medical supervision at randomization (Week 0).

Blinding & Control Treatment:

  • A double-dummy design was used. Patients also received a placebo pMDI (matching active pMDI), administered as 2 puffs b.i.d. to maintain blinding.

Background Therapy:

  • Salbutamol was provided as rescue medication.

Patient Training & Compliance:

  • Inhaler use was assessed at visits, with retraining as needed; patients used an AeroChamber Plus™ spacer if necessary, and each inhaler was labeled with "sun" (morning) and "moon" (evening) stickers.
Medicin: Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler
A fixed combination of beclometasone dipropionate 100 µg and formoterol fumarate 6 µg per actuation, delivered via a breath-actuated dry powder inhaler (DPI).
Andre navne:
  • beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) 100 µg / formoterol fumarate (FF) 6 µg NEXThealer
Aktiv komparator: Foster 100/6µg pMDI

Patients in this arm received Foster® pMDI 100/6 µg, a fixed-dose combination of beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) 100 µg and formoterol fumarate (FF) 6 µg per actuation, delivered via a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI).

Treatment Details:

  • Dosage: 2 puffs twice daily (b.i.d.), totaling 400/24 µg BDP/FF daily.
  • Duration: 12 weeks.
  • Administration: First dose under medical supervision at randomization (Week 0).

Blinding & Control Treatment:

  • A double-dummy design was used. Patients also received a placebo DPI (matching active DPI), administered as 2 inhalations b.i.d. to maintain blinding.

Background Therapy:

  • Salbutamol was provided as rescue medication.

Patient Training & Compliance:

  • Inhaler use was assessed at visits, with retraining as needed; patients used an AeroChamber Plus™ spacer if necessary, and each inhaler was labeled with "sun" (morning) and "moon" (evening) stickers.
Medicin: Foster 100/6µg pMDI
A fixed combination of beclometasone dipropionate 100 µg and formoterol fumarate 6 µg per actuation, delivered via a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) with HFA_134a propellant.
Andre navne:
  • beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) 100µg / formoterol fumarate (FF) 6µg pMDI

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Primære resultatmål

I et klinisk studies protokol er det planlagte resultatmål, der er det vigtigste for at evaluere effekten af ​​en intervention/behandling. De fleste kliniske undersøgelser har ét primært resultatmål, men nogle har mere end ét.
Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period in Average Pre-dose Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)
Tidsramme: Baseline (Week 0, Visit 3) and Week 12 (EoT)

PEF= peak expiratory flow. The peak expiratory flow (also known as a peak flow or peak flow rate) is the maximal rate that a person can exhale during a short maximal expiratory effort after a full inspiration.

In this study PEF (L/min) was monitored twice daily using a portable electronic peak flow meter before medication intake: morning (7:00-9:00 am) and evening (7:00-9:00 pm). Each session required at least two blows, with the highest valid value recorded.

  • Baseline pre-dose morning PEF was calculated as the mean of all valid pre-dose morning Best PEF values from the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3).

  • The average pre-dose morning PEF over the entire treatment period was computed as:

    ∑Valid pre-dose morning Best PEF values (treatment period) / Number of days with available data

  • Valid pre-dose morning Best PEF values = Highest value recorded from at least two PEF measurements per session, within the range 50-900 L/min
Baseline (Week 0, Visit 3) and Week 12 (EoT)

Sekundære resultatmål

Sekundære resultatmål

I en klinisk undersøgelses protokol er et planlagt resultatmål, der ikke er lige så vigtigt som det primære resultatmål for at evaluere effekten af ​​en intervention, men som stadig er af interesse. De fleste kliniske undersøgelser har mere end ét sekundært resultatmål.
Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period in Average Pre-dose Morning Peek Expiratory Flow (PEF)
Tidsramme: Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT)

PEF (L/min) was monitored twice daily using a portable electronic peak flow meter before medication intake: in the morning (7:00-9:00 am) and evening (7:00-9:00 pm). Each session required at least two blows, with the highest valid value recorded.

  • Baseline pre-dose morning PEF was calculated as the mean of all valid pre-dose morning Best PEF values from the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3).

  • The average pre-dose morning PEF for each inter-visit period was computed as:

    ∑all valid pre-dose morning Best PEF values / number of days with available data

  • Valid pre-dose morning Best PEF values = Highest value recorded from at least two PEF measurements per session, within the range 50-900 L/min
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT)
Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Average Pre-dose Evening PEF
Tidsramme: Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks.

PEF (L/min) was monitored twice daily using a portable electronic peak flow meter before medication intake: morning (7:00-9:00 am) and evening (7:00-9:00 pm). Each session required at least two blows, with the highest valid value recorded.

  • Baseline pre-dose evening PEF was calculated as the mean of all valid pre-dose evening Best PEF values from the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3).

  • The average pre-dose evening PEF for each inter-visit period was computed as:

    ∑all valid pre-dose evening Best PEF values / number of days with available data

  • Valid pre-dose evening Best PEF values = Highest value recorded from at least two PEF measurements per session, within the range 50-900 L/min.
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks.
Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Daily PEF Variability
Tidsramme: Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks

PEF (L/min) was monitored twice daily using a portable electronic peak flow meter before medication intake: morning (7:00-9:00 am) and evening (7:00-9:00 pm). Each session required at least two blows, with the highest valid value recorded.

  • Baseline average daily PEF variability was calculated as the mean of all daily PEF variability values recorded in the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3).

  • The average daily PEF variability for each inter-visit period was computed as:

    ∑all daily PEF variability values / number of days with available data

  • Daily PEF variability was calculated only for days where both pre-dose morning Best PEF and pre-dose evening Best PEF values were available.
  • Valid Best PEF values were defined as the highest value recorded from at least two PEF measurements per session, within the range 50-900 L/min.
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks
Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Average Use of Rescue Medication (Number of Puffs/Day)
Tidsramme: Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks

Rescue medication use was recorded daily in an electronic diary, with puffs taken during the day recorded in the evening session and puffs taken at night recorded the next morning.

  • Baseline rescue medication use was the mean daily use over the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3).

  • Average daily use of rescue medication was calculated as:

    • all puffs per day / number of days with available data
  • It was assessed for each inter-visit period (from the evening of the clinic visit to the morning of the next visit) and over the entire treatment period (from the evening of the first treatment day to the morning of the last).
  • At least 7 valid days were required per period, with at least one evaluable inter-visit period needed for full analysis.
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks
Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Percentage of Rescue Medication-Free Days
Tidsramme: Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks

Rescue medication use was recorded daily in an electronic diary, with puffs taken during the day recorded in the evening session and puffs taken at night recorded the next morning.

  • Baseline percentage of rescue medication-free days was calculated over the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3).
  • Percentage of rescue medication-free days was calculated as:

(Number of days with no rescue medication use / Total number of days with available data)×100

  • It was assessed for each inter-visit period (from the evening of the clinic visit to the morning of the next visit) and over the entire treatment period (from the evening of the first treatment day to the morning of the last).
  • At least 7 valid days were required per period, with at least one evaluable inter-visit period needed for full analysis.
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks
Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Average Total Morning Asthma Symptom Score
Tidsramme: Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks

Asthma symptoms (cough, wheeze, chest tightness and breathlessness) were scored, always before PEF measurements, twice daily - daytime and nighttime - as follows:

Daytime asthma symptom score (ranging 0-3, where the lower the score the better the outcome):

0 No symptom

  1. Mild: symptoms not causing awakening
  2. Moderate: discomfort causing awakenings
  3. Severe: causing awakenings for most of the night / don't allow to sleep at all The average score of each symptom is the mean value of all measurements (recorded in the evening session, as per study methodology).

Total average Daily Asthma Symptoms score daytime = Σ(Cough daytime score + Wheeze daytime score + Chest Tightness daytime score + Breathlessness daytime score)/ Number of days with available data.

The average of daytime asthma symptoms is the mean value of all daytime measurements, ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 12 (maximum severity). The lower the score, the better the symptom.
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks
Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Average Total Evening Asthma Symptom Scores
Tidsramme: Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks

Asthma symptoms (cough, wheeze, chest tightness and breathlessness) were scored, always before PEF measurements, twice daily - daytime and nighttime - as follows:

Nighttime asthma symptom score (ranging 0-3, where the lower the score the better the outcome):

0 No symptom

  1. Mild: symptoms not causing awakening
  2. Moderate: discomfort causing awakenings
  3. Severe: causing awakenings for most of the night / don't allow to sleep at all The average score of each symptom is the mean value of all measurements (Recorded in the morning session of the next day).

Total average Daily Asthma Symptoms score nighttime = Σ(Cough nighttime score + Wheeze nighttime score + Chest Tightness nighttime score + Breathlessness nighttime score)/ Number of days with available data.

The average of nighttime asthma symptoms is the mean value of all nighttime measurements, ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 12 (maximum severity). The lower the score, the better the symptom.
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks
Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Percentage of Asthma Symptom-Free Days
Tidsramme: Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks

An asthma symptom-free day was defined as a day with both total morning and total evening asthma symptom scores = 0. Only days with both scores available were included.

  • Baseline percentage of symptom-free days was the mean percentage over the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3).
  • Percentage of asthma symptom-free days was calculated as:

(Number of symptom-free days / Total number of days with available data)×100

  • It was assessed for each inter-visit period (from the evening of the clinic visit to the morning of the next visit) and over the 12-week treatment period (from the evening of treatment start to the morning of treatment end).
  • At least 7 valid days were required per period, with at least one evaluable inter-visit period needed for full analysis.
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks
Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Percentage of Asthma Control Days
Tidsramme: Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks

An asthma control day was defined as a day without rescue medication use and with both total morning and total evening asthma symptom scores = 0. Only days with both scores available were included in the calculation.

  • Baseline percentage of asthma control days was the mean percentage over the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3).
  • Percentage of asthma control days was calculated as:

(Number of asthma control days / Total number of days with available data)×100

  • It was assessed for each inter-visit period (from the evening of the clinic visit to the morning of the next visit) and over the 12-week treatment period (from the evening of treatment start to the morning of treatment end).
  • At least 7 valid days were required per period, with at least one evaluable inter-visit period needed for full analysis.
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks
Change From Baseline in Pre-Dose Morning FEV1 at Each Clinic Visit
Tidsramme: Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT)

Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) was measured pre-dose in the morning (7:00-9:00 am) at each clinic visit using spirometry, following standardized procedures. Baseline FEV1 was recorded at Visit 3 (Week 0, randomization), and changes were assessed at each visit (Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12).

Patients performed spirometry in a seated position, using the same calibrated spirometer across all visits. They inhaled deeply to total lung capacity and exhaled forcefully and completely. At least three acceptable maneuvers were required, with the highest valid measurement recorded. FEV1 was expressed in liters (L), and a higher value indicated better lung function.
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT)
Change From Baseline in Pre-Dose Morning FVC at Each Clinic Visit
Tidsramme: Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT)

Forced vital capacity (FVC) is the maximum capacity of air that a patient can exhale after a maximum inspiration. It measures the volume of air exhaled in a spirometer, after a maximal inspiration. FVC was measured pre-dose in the morning (7:00-9:00 am) at each clinic visit using spirometry, following standardized procedures. Baseline FVC was recorded at Visit 3 (Week 0, randomization), and changes were assessed at each visit (Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12).

Patients performed spirometry in a seated position, ensuring consistency across visits. They were instructed to inhale deeply to full lung capacity and exhale forcefully and completely into the spirometer. At least three acceptable maneuvers were required per session, with the highest valid measurement recorded. The higher the capacity, measured in liters, the better the outcome.
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT)
Change From Baseline to Last Visit in ACQ-6 Score
Tidsramme: Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT)

The ACQ-6 was a validated questionnaire assessing asthma control, consisting of six items: five on asthma symptoms (nighttime waking, symptoms on waking, activity limitation, shortness of breath, wheezing) and one on rescue medication use, all self-administered. Each item was scored from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (maximum impairment), and the ACQ-6 total score was the mean of all six items, ranging from 0 (totally controlled asthma) to 6 (severely uncontrolled asthma). Hence, the higher the score, the worse the outcome.

Baseline ACQ-6 was assessed at Visit 3 (Week 0, randomization), and the final score was recorded at Visit 9 (Week 12, EOT). The change from baseline was calculated as the difference between these values .
Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT)
Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event (TEAE) or Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR)
Tidsramme: From Week 0 (Visit 3, Randomization) to Week 12 (Visit 9, EoT)

An adverse event (AE) was defined as "any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study patient administered a medicinal product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment". An AE could therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory finding), symptom or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.

An adverse drug reaction (ADR) was defined as an "untoward and unintended response to an investigational medicinal product related to any dose administered".

An SAE/serious ADR was defined as any untoward medical occurrence or effect that at any dose Resulted in death, Was life-threatening, Required hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, Resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, Was a congenital anomaly or birth defect, Was a medically significant AE.
From Week 0 (Visit 3, Randomization) to Week 12 (Visit 9, EoT)

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Sponsor

Sponsor

Den organisation eller person, der igangsætter undersøgelsen, og som har myndighed og kontrol over undersøgelsen.
Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.

Efterforskere

Efterforskere

En forsker involveret i et klinisk studie. Beslægtede termer omfatter stedets principal investigator, site sub-investigator, studieformand, undersøgelsesleder og undersøgelseshovedinvestigator.
  • Ledende efterforsker: Jinping MD Zheng, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Generelle publikationer

Hjælpsomme links

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

Studiestart

Den faktiske dato, hvor den første deltager blev tilmeldt en klinisk undersøgelse. Den "forventede" undersøgelses startdato er den dato, som forskerne tror vil være undersøgelsens startdato.
9. oktober 2017

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

Primær færdiggørelse

Den dato, hvor den sidste deltager i et klinisk studie blev undersøgt eller modtog en intervention for at indsamle endelige data for det primære resultatmål. Hvorvidt det kliniske studie sluttede i henhold til protokollen eller blev afsluttet, påvirker ikke denne dato. For kliniske undersøgelser med mere end ét primært resultatmål med forskellige afslutningsdatoer refererer dette udtryk til den dato, hvor dataindsamlingen er afsluttet for alle de primære resultatmål. Den "forventede" primære afslutningsdato er den dato, som forskerne tror vil være den primære afslutningsdato for undersøgelsen.
28. december 2021

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

Studieafslutning

Den dato, hvor den sidste deltager i et klinisk studie blev undersøgt eller modtog en intervention/behandling for at indsamle endelige data for de primære resultatmål, sekundære udfaldsmål og uønskede hændelser (det vil sige den sidste deltagers sidste besøg). Den "forventede" undersøgelses afslutningsdato er den dato, som forskerne tror vil være undersøgelsens afslutningsdato.
28. december 2021

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

Først indsendt

Den dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator første gang indsendte en undersøgelsespost til ClinicalTrials.gov. Der er typisk en forsinkelse på et par dage mellem den første indsendte dato og postens tilgængelighed på ClinicalTrials.gov (den første offentliggjorte dato).
12. februar 2018

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

Den dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator første gang indsender en undersøgelsespost, der er i overensstemmelse med National Library of Medicine (NLM) kvalitetskontrol (QC) gennemgangskriterier. Sponsoren eller investigatoren skal muligvis revidere og indsende en undersøgelsespost en eller flere gange, før NLM's kvalitetskontrolkriterier er opfyldt. Det er sponsorens eller investigatorens ansvar at sikre, at undersøgelsesposten er i overensstemmelse med NLM QC-gennemgangskriterierne.
26. februar 2018

Først opslået (Faktiske)

Først opslået

Datoen, hvor undersøgelsesposten først var tilgængelig på ClinicalTrials.gov efter National Library of Medicine (NLM) kvalitetskontrol (QC) gennemgang er afsluttet. Der er typisk en forsinkelse på et par dage mellem den dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator indsendte undersøgelsesposten, og den første offentliggjorte dato.
5. marts 2018

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

Sidste opdatering sendt

Den seneste dato, hvor ændringer i en undersøgelsespost blev gjort tilgængelig på ClinicalTrials.gov. Der kan være en forsinkelse mellem det tidspunkt, hvornår ændringerne blev indsendt til ClinicalTrials.gov af undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator (datoen for sidste opdatering afsendt) og den sidste opdatering, der blev sendt.
10. august 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

Den seneste dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator indsendte ændringer til en undersøgelsespost, der er i overensstemmelse med National Library of Medicine (NLM) kvalitetskontrol (QC) gennemgangskriterier. Det er sponsorens eller investigatorens ansvar at sikre, at undersøgelsesposten er i overensstemmelse med NLM QC-gennemgangskriterierne.
24. juni 2026

Sidst verificeret

Sidst verificeret

Den seneste dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator bekræftede oplysningerne om en klinisk undersøgelse på ClinicalTrials.gov som nøjagtige og aktuelle. Hvis en undersøgelse med rekrutteringsstatus som rekruttering; rekrutterer endnu ikke; eller aktiv, ikke rekruttering er ikke blevet bekræftet inden for de seneste 2 år, er undersøgelsens rekrutteringsstatus vist som ukendt.
1. juni 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Nøgleord

Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

Andre identifikatorer eller ID-numre end NCT-nummeret, der er tildelt til en klinisk undersøgelse af undersøgelsens sponsor, finansieringsgivere eller andre. Disse numre kan omfatte unikke identifikatorer fra andre forsøgsregistre og National Institutes of Health-bevillingsnumre.
  • CCD-01535BA0-01
  • CTR20170917 (Anden identifikator: http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/)

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Cookieindstillinger

Vi bruger cookies for at sikre, at vi giver dig den bedste oplevelse på vores hjemmeside. For flere detaljer skal du læse omhyggeligt vores Politik om beskyttelse af personlige oplysninger og cookies. ...>>>Du kan når som helst ændre dine præferencer eller trække dit samtykke tilbage ved at slette cookies fra din hjemmeside eller computer som beskrevet i politikken. Accepter det og vælg dine præferencer ved at markere de tilsvarende felter i afsnittet "Administrer indstillinger" nedenfor. Læs vores servicevilkår omhyggeligt, inden du fortsætter med at bruge nogen del af dette websted.
«Administrer indstillinger