Paroxetine-referenced Study Evaluating Three Doses of DVS SR in Outpatients With MDD

October 8, 2013 updated by: Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Paroxetine-referenced, Parallel-group Study to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy, and Tolerability of 3 Fixed Doses (50mg, 100mg, AND 200mg) of Desvenlafaxine Succinate Sustained-release Tablets in Adult Outpatients With Major Depressive Disorder

This study will assess the safety, tolerability and efficacy of desvenlafaxine succinate sustained release (DVS SR) in subjects with major depressive disorder.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The primary objective of this study is to investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of desvenlafaxine succinate sustained release (DVS SR) in Chinese, Taiwanese, South Korean, and Indian subjects with major depressive disorder (MDD) receiving daily doses of 50 mg, 100 mg, or 200 mg. The secondary objective is to obtain additional information regarding the efficacy of DVS SR in subjects with MDD receiving daily doses of 50 mg, 100 mg, or 200 mg. Additional objectives include obtaining general and functional quality of life outcome data.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
807

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Beijing, China, 100083
      • Beijing, China, 100088
      • Guangdong Province, China, 510370
      • Hunan Province, China, 410011
      • Jiangsu Province, China, 210029
      • Shanghai, China, 200030
      • Shanghai, China, 200065
      • Shanxi Province, China, 710032
      • Sichuan Province, China, 610041
      • Yunnan Province, China, 650032
      • Zhejiang Province, China, 310003
  • India
      • Andhra Pradesh, India, 500 038
      • Andhra Pradesh, India, 500034
      • Andhra Pradesh, India, 517 507
      • Andhra Pradesh, India, 530 002
      • Chandigarh, India, 160012
      • Gujarat, India, 380006
      • Gujarat, India, 380013
      • Karnataka, India, 575 001
      • Karnataka, India, 575018
      • Maharashtra, India, 400 012
      • Maharashtra, India, 400 026
      • Maharashtra, India, 411001
      • Mumbai Maharashtra, India, H19400 022
      • New Delhi, India, 110002
      • Punjab, India, 141001
      • Uttar Pradesh, India, 226003
  • Korea, Republic of
      • Incheon, Korea, Republic of, 400-711
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 137-701
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 158-710
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 138-736
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 110-744
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 135-710
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 135-720
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 140-757
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 150-719
  • Taiwan
      • Chang-Hua, Taiwan, ROC 500
      • KaoHsiung, Taiwan, ROC 80708
      • Taipei, Taiwan, ROC 100
      • Taipei, Taiwan, ROC 111
      • Taipei, Taiwan, ROC 112
      • Taipei, Taiwan, ROC 114
      • Taipei, Taiwan, ROC 220

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Primary Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Outpatient men and women at least 18 years of age.
  2. Have a primary diagnosis of MDD based on the criteria in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM IV), single or recurrent episode, without psychotic features.
  3. Have a HAM D17 total score ≥20 at the screening and baseline (study day 1) visit.

Primary Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Treatment with DVS SR at any time in the past.
  2. Significant risk of suicide based on clinical judgment, including common suicidal thoughts and suicide having been considered as a possible solution even without specific plans or intent.
  3. Any unstable hepatic, renal, pulmonary, cardiovascular (including uncontrolled hypertension), ophthalmologic, neurologic, or any other medical condition that might confound the study or put the subject at greater risk during study participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: A
DVS SR 50mg/day
Drug: DVS SR
Arm 1: 50mg DVS SR tablet, QD, 8 weeks treatment with 2 week taper Arm 2: 100mg DVS SR tablet, QD, 8 weeks treatment with 2 week taper Arm 3: 200mg DVS SR tablet, QD, 8 weeks treatment with 2 week taper
Experimental: B
DVS SR 100mg/day
Drug: DVS SR
Arm 1: 50mg DVS SR tablet, QD, 8 weeks treatment with 2 week taper Arm 2: 100mg DVS SR tablet, QD, 8 weeks treatment with 2 week taper Arm 3: 200mg DVS SR tablet, QD, 8 weeks treatment with 2 week taper
Experimental: C
DVS SR 200mg/day
Drug: DVS SR
Arm 1: 50mg DVS SR tablet, QD, 8 weeks treatment with 2 week taper Arm 2: 100mg DVS SR tablet, QD, 8 weeks treatment with 2 week taper Arm 3: 200mg DVS SR tablet, QD, 8 weeks treatment with 2 week taper
Active Comparator: D
Paroxetine 20mg/day
Drug: Paroxetine
20 mg Paroxetine capsule, QD, 8 weeks treatment with 2 week taper

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Responders With a 50% or Greater Decrease From Baseline on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 17-item (HAM-D17)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
HAM-D17 is a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 17 items characteristically associated with major depression. Items are scored on either a 3 point (0 to 2) or a 5 point scale (0 to 4), with 0=none/absent and 4=most severe, for a maximum total score of 50.
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Improvement (CGI-I) Scores
Time Frame: 8 weeks
CGI-I is a global rating scale that measures disease improvement. Using a 7-point scale, the clinician rates how much the subject's illness has improved or worsened relative to the baseline status (1= very much improved; 7= very much worse).
8 weeks
Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Scores
Time Frame: 8 weeks
CGI-S is a global rating scale that measures the severity of a subject's disease. Using a 7-point scale, the clinician rates the severity of the patient's mental illness at the time of the assessment, relative to the clinician's experience with subjects who have the same diagnosis (1= normal, not at all ill; 7= among the most extremely ill).
8 weeks
Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score Mean Change From Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 8 weeks
Measures the overall severity of depressive symptoms. The MADRS has a 10-item checklist. Items are rated on a scale of 0-6, for a total score range of 0 (low severity of depressive symptoms) to 60 (high severity of depressive symptoms).
Baseline and 8 weeks
Visual Analog Scale-pain Intensity (VAS-PI) Score Mean Change From Baseline
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The VAS-PI is a self-rated visual analog scale for the assessment of pain. Scores on the VAS-PI range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). A decrease in VAS-PI overall scores indicates a subject's assessment of an improvement in pain.
8 weeks
Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 6-item (HAM-D6) Score Mean Change From Baseline
Time Frame: 8 weeks
HAM-D6: standardized, clinician-administered rating scale is a subset of the HAM-D17 that assesses 6 items associated with major depression. The scale uses HAM-D17 items 1, 2, 7, 8, 10 and 13. Item 13 is scored 0 to 2 (0=none/absent to 2=most severe) and all others are scored 0 to 4 (0=none/absent to 4=most severe). Total score ranges from 0 to 22; higher score indicates more depression.
8 weeks
Covi Anxiety Scale Score Mean Change From Baseline
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Covi anxiety scale measures the severity of anxiety symptoms on 3 items: verbal report, behavior and somatic complaints. Each dimension is assessed using a 5-point scale: 1 = not at all, 2 = somewhat, 3 = moderately, 4 = considerably, 5 = Very much. Total score ranges from 3 to 15; higher score indicates more anxiety.
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Trial Manager, For China: medinfo@wyeth.com

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 6, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 8, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 9, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 3, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 8, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 3151A1-336

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings