Drug Eluting Stents In The Critically Ischemic Lower Leg (DESTINY)

December 1, 2010 updated by: Flanders Medical Research Program

The DESTINY Trial: a Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial Comparing the Implant of a Drug Eluting Stent (XIENCE V, Abbott Vascular) vs. a Bare Metal Stent (MULTILINK VISION, Abbott Vascular) in the Critically Ischemic Lower Leg

The Destiny trial compares the use of bare metal stent systems with drug eluting stent systems in the treatment of infrapopliteal lesions in patients with Critical Limb Ischemia. It will be investigated whether there is a difference in 12 month angiographic patency of the stented area using the 2 different stent systems.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
140

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Belgium
      • Bonheiden, Belgium, 2820
        • Imelda Hospital
      • Dendermonde, Belgium, 9200
        • AZ Sint-Blasius
  • France
      • Ollioules, France, 83192
        • Polyclinique Les Fleurs
  • Germany
      • Bad Krozingen, Germany, 79189
        • Herz-Zentrum Bad Krozingen
      • Leipzig, Germany, 04289
        • Herzzentrum

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Stenotic (> 50%) or occlusive atherosclerotic disease of the infrapopliteal arteries
  • A maximum of two focal target lesions in one or more infrapopliteal vessels
  • Length of lesion is maximally 40 mm, allowing maximally 2 stents to be implanted
  • Reference vessel diameter should be 2-3.5 mm
  • Symptomatic critical limb ischemia (Rutherford 4, 5)
  • The patient must be > 18 years of age
  • Life-expectancy of more than 12 months
  • The patient has no child bearing potential or negative serum pregnancy test within 7 days of the index procedure
  • The patient must be willing and able to return to the appropriate follow-up times for the duration of the study
  • The patient must provide written patient informed consent that is approved by the ethics committee

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusing treatment
  • The reference segment diameter is not suitable for available stent design.
  • Unsuccessfully treated (>30% residual stenosis) proximal inflow limiting arterial stenosis
  • Untreatable lesion located at the distal outflow arteries
  • More than two infrapopliteal lesions in the same limb
  • Previously implanted stent(s) or PTA at the same lesion site
  • Lesion location requiring kissing stent procedure
  • Lesion lies within or adjacent to an aneurysm
  • Inflow-limiting arterial lesions left untreated
  • The patient has a known allergy to heparin, Aspirin or other anticoagulant/anti-platelet therapies or a bleeding diatheses or is unable, or unwilling, to tolerate such therapies.
  • The patient takes Phenprocoumon (Marcumar).
  • The patient has a history of prior life-threatening contrast media reaction.
  • The patient is currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug trial.
  • The patient is currently breast-feeding, pregnant or intends to become pregnant.
  • The patient is mentally ill or retarded.
  • Subject has received a heart transplant or any other organ transplant or is on a waiting list for any organ transplant
  • Subject is receiving or scheduled to receive anticancer therapy for malignancy within 30 days prior to or after the procedure
  • Subject is receiving immunosuppression therapy, or has known serious immunosuppressive disease (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus), or has severe autoimmune disease that requires chronic immunosuppressive therapy (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus, etc.) The patient should also not receive inhibitors of CYP3A (such as Itraconazole, and Erythromycin), or inducers of CYP3A (such as Rifampin) within 90 days following the procedure.
  • Subject is receiving or is scheduled to receive chronic anticoagulation therapy (e.g., heparin, coumadin)
  • Use of alternative therapy (e.g. atherectomy, cutting balloon, laser, radiation therapy) as part of the index procedure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: 1
drug eluting stent
Device: XIENCE V everolimus eluting coronary stent system
Placebo Comparator: 2
Bare Metal Stent
Device: MULTILINK VISION coronary stent system

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Angiographic patency, defined as angiographic binary in-stent restenosis rate (>50% stenosis).
Time Frame: one year
one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Technical success defined as the ability to cross and dilate the lesion to achieve residual angiographic stenosis no greater than 30% and residual stenosis less than 50% by duplex ultrasound (US) imaging.
Time Frame: procedure
procedure
Primary patency rate at each follow-up. Patients that did not receive any BTK-reintervention and do not exhibit significant restenosis on duplex (PVR ≥ 2.4) are defined as being primary patent at the given follow-up.
Time Frame: one year
one year
Limb-salvage rate (LSR) defined as 1 minus major amputation rate (major amputation is defined as at or above ankle, as opposed to minor amputation being at or below metatarsus preserving functionality of foot).
Time Frame: one year
one year
Clinical events defined as fatal, life-threatening, or judged to be severe by the investigator; resulted in persistent or significant disability; necessitated surgical or percutaneous intervention; or required prolonged hospitalization.
Time Frame: one year
one year
Clinical success defined as an improvement of Rutherford classification of one class or more as compared to the pre-procedure Rutherford classification.
Time Frame: one year
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Flanders Medical Research Program

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Marc Bosiers, MD, AZ Sint-Blasius, Dendermonde, Belgium
  • Principal Investigator: Dierk Scheinert, MD, Herzzentrum, Leipzig, Germany

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 1, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 1, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 2, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 2, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 1, 2010

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • FMRP-002

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peripheral Vascular Disease

Clinical Trials on XIENCE V everolimus eluting coronary stent system

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings