N-acetylcysteine and NMDA Antagonist Interactions

May 7, 2015 updated by: Yale University
This study tests the hypothesis that extrasynaptic mechanisms are critically linked with cognitive effects of NMDA antagonism as evidenced by event-related potentials (ERPs) in healthy humans.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
16

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Connecticut
      • West Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06516
        • VHA Connecticut

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ages of 21-45 years from all ethnic backgrounds.
  • Male or female.
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • DSM-IV diagnosis for a psychotic, depressive or anxiety disorder.
  • A history of significant medical/neurological disease such as cardiac, thyroid, renal, hepatic abnormality, seizure disorder. Unstable medical condition based on EKG, vital signs, physical examination and laboratory work-up (CBC with differential, SMA-7, LFTs, TFTs, UA, Utox, Urine pregnancy test) .
  • History of severe allergies or multiple adverse drug reactions.
  • Any medication that in the opinion of the PI could interfere with either the safety of the study and/or the outcome measures.
  • Any other conditions which in the opinion of the investigator would preclude participation in the study.
  • History of major psychiatric disorder in first degree relatives.
  • Current substance abuse/dependency determined by urine toxicology.
  • Current treatment with medications with psychotropic effects.
  • Treatment with benzodiazepines within one week prior to testing.
  • Current pregnancy, unsatisfactory birth control method report for females.
  • Education < 10th grade.
  • IQ < 70, MR as determined by Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence.
  • Non-English speaking.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Arm I
The NAC capsules were administered orally in divided doses: 2000 mg followed by 1000 mg 2 hours later. Each morning, 165 min after NAC administration, subjects received a 1-min bolus of normal saline, followed by a 70-minlong saline infusion during which behavioral, cognitive, and ERP data were collected. Ketamine was administered intravenously as a bolus of .23 mg/kg over 1 min followed by .58 mg/kg for 30 min (SPM and RVP), and then .29 mg/kg for 40 min (P300 and MMN).
Drug: N-acetylcysteine and ketamine
Active drug (N-acetylcysteine)
Other Names:
  • NAC
Placebo Comparator: Arm II
The placebo capsules were administered orally in divided doses: 2000 mg followed by 1000 mg 2 hours later. Each morning, 165 min after placebo administration, subjects received a 1-min bolus of normal saline, followed by a 70-minlong saline infusion during which behavioral, cognitive, and ERP data were collected. Ketamine was administered intravenously as a bolus of .23 mg/kg over 1 min followed by .58 mg/kg for 30 min (SPM and RVP), and then .29 mg/kg for 40 min (P300 and MMN).
Drug: placebo and ketamine
placebo N-acetylcysteine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Target P300
Time Frame: daily

The Target P300 measures were obtained from the Fz, Cz and Pz electrodes.

Target stimuli were 1000 Hz tones (500 ms) and novel stimuli (~250 ms) were unique environmental sounds (e.g., dog bark) used in prior studies of the novelty P300. Subjects were instructed to respond to the target sounds by pressing a button using their dominant hand index finger. The standard stimuli were 20, 30 or 40 Hz click trains (500 ms) in the first, second, and third runs, respectively. The auditory steady state EEG driving data obtained from these standard stimuli will be presented in a separate report. All stimuli were presented at 80 dB SPL.
daily
Novel P300
Time Frame: daily

The Novel P300 measures were obtained from the Fz, Cz and Pz electrodes.

Target stimuli were 1000 Hz tones (500 ms) and novel stimuli (~250 ms) were unique environmental sounds (e.g., dog bark) used in prior studies of the novelty P300. Subjects were instructed to respond to the target sounds by pressing a button using their dominant hand index finger. The standard stimuli were 20, 30 or 40 Hz click trains (500 ms) in the first, second, and third runs, respectively. The auditory steady state EEG driving data obtained from these standard stimuli will be presented in a separate report. All stimuli were presented at 80 dB SPL.
daily

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mismatch Negativity (MMN) Intensity
Time Frame: daily

Mismatch Negativity (MMN) Intensity difference waves at midline electrodes (Fz, Cz and Pz).

The frequent standard tones were of 75 ms duration with 5 ms rise and fall time, and were composed of 500, 1000, and 1500 Hz sinusoidal partials (harmonics) that resulted in a single high pitched beep sound.

All tones were presented at 76 dB sound pressure level (SPL) with the exception of intensity deviants. The three deviants were distinguishable from standard tones in either intensity, frequency, or duration.

Subjects performed a visual discrimination distractor task during the MMN runs and were instructed to ignore the tones.

The mismatch negativity (MMN) measure included 3 types of deviant tones (stimuli) that the subjects heard: 1. Frequency deviant, 2. Intensity deviant, 3. Duration deviant. The response to these 3 types of deviants were recorded in the EEG. Therefore each deviant was associated with different waves which we measured in amplitude (microvolts)
daily
Mismatch Negativity (MMN) Frequency
Time Frame: daily

Mismatch Negativity (MMN) Frequency difference waves at midline electrodes (Fx, Cz and Pz).

The frequent standard tones were of 75 ms duration with 5 ms rise and fall time, and were composed of 500, 1000, and 1500 Hz sinusoidal partials (harmonics) that resulted in a single high pitched beep sound.

All tones were presented at 76 dB sound pressure level (SPL) with the exception of intensity deviants. The three deviants were distinguishable from standard tones in either intensity, frequency, or duration.

Subjects performed a visual discrimination distractor task during the MMN runs and were instructed to ignore the tones.

The mismatch negativity (MMN) measure included 3 types of deviant tones (stimuli) that the subjects heard: 1. Frequency deviant, 2. Intensity deviant, 3. Duration deviant. The response to these 3 types of deviants were recorded in the EEG. Therefore each deviant was associated with different waves which we measured in amplitude (microvolts)
daily
Mismatch Negativity (MMN) Duration
Time Frame: daily

Mismatch Negativity (MMN) Duration difference waves at midline electrodes (Fz, Cz and Pz).

The frequent standard tones were of 75 ms duration with 5 ms rise and fall time, and were composed of 500, 1000, and 1500 Hz sinusoidal partials (harmonics) that resulted in a single high pitched beep sound.

All tones were presented at 76 dB sound pressure level (SPL) with the exception of intensity deviants. The three deviants were distinguishable from standard tones in either intensity, frequency, or duration.

Subjects performed a visual discrimination distractor task during the MMN runs and were instructed to ignore the tones.

The mismatch negativity (MMN) measure included 3 types of deviant tones (stimuli) that the subjects heard: 1. Frequency deviant, 2. Intensity deviant, 3. Duration deviant. The response to these 3 types of deviants were recorded in the EEG. Therefore each deviant was associated with different waves which we measured in amplitude (microvolts)
daily

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Yale University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Handan Gunduz-Bruce, M.D., Yale School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 29, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 29, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 11, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 8, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 7, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 0508000518

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Dysfunction

Clinical Trials on N-acetylcysteine and ketamine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings