N-acetylcysteine and NMDA Antagonist Interactions

May 7, 2015 updated by: Yale University
This study tests the hypothesis that extrasynaptic mechanisms are critically linked with cognitive effects of NMDA antagonism as evidenced by event-related potentials (ERPs) in healthy humans.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • West Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06516
        • VHA Connecticut

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ages of 21-45 years from all ethnic backgrounds.
  • Male or female.
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • DSM-IV diagnosis for a psychotic, depressive or anxiety disorder.
  • A history of significant medical/neurological disease such as cardiac, thyroid, renal, hepatic abnormality, seizure disorder. Unstable medical condition based on EKG, vital signs, physical examination and laboratory work-up (CBC with differential, SMA-7, LFTs, TFTs, UA, Utox, Urine pregnancy test) .
  • History of severe allergies or multiple adverse drug reactions.
  • Any medication that in the opinion of the PI could interfere with either the safety of the study and/or the outcome measures.
  • Any other conditions which in the opinion of the investigator would preclude participation in the study.
  • History of major psychiatric disorder in first degree relatives.
  • Current substance abuse/dependency determined by urine toxicology.
  • Current treatment with medications with psychotropic effects.
  • Treatment with benzodiazepines within one week prior to testing.
  • Current pregnancy, unsatisfactory birth control method report for females.
  • Education < 10th grade.
  • IQ < 70, MR as determined by Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence.
  • Non-English speaking.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Arm I
The NAC capsules were administered orally in divided doses: 2000 mg followed by 1000 mg 2 hours later. Each morning, 165 min after NAC administration, subjects received a 1-min bolus of normal saline, followed by a 70-minlong saline infusion during which behavioral, cognitive, and ERP data were collected. Ketamine was administered intravenously as a bolus of .23 mg/kg over 1 min followed by .58 mg/kg for 30 min (SPM and RVP), and then .29 mg/kg for 40 min (P300 and MMN).
Active drug (N-acetylcysteine)
Other Names:
  • NAC
Placebo Comparator: Arm II
The placebo capsules were administered orally in divided doses: 2000 mg followed by 1000 mg 2 hours later. Each morning, 165 min after placebo administration, subjects received a 1-min bolus of normal saline, followed by a 70-minlong saline infusion during which behavioral, cognitive, and ERP data were collected. Ketamine was administered intravenously as a bolus of .23 mg/kg over 1 min followed by .58 mg/kg for 30 min (SPM and RVP), and then .29 mg/kg for 40 min (P300 and MMN).
placebo N-acetylcysteine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Target P300
Time Frame: daily

The Target P300 measures were obtained from the Fz, Cz and Pz electrodes.

Target stimuli were 1000 Hz tones (500 ms) and novel stimuli (~250 ms) were unique environmental sounds (e.g., dog bark) used in prior studies of the novelty P300. Subjects were instructed to respond to the target sounds by pressing a button using their dominant hand index finger. The standard stimuli were 20, 30 or 40 Hz click trains (500 ms) in the first, second, and third runs, respectively. The auditory steady state EEG driving data obtained from these standard stimuli will be presented in a separate report. All stimuli were presented at 80 dB SPL.

daily
Novel P300
Time Frame: daily

The Novel P300 measures were obtained from the Fz, Cz and Pz electrodes.

Target stimuli were 1000 Hz tones (500 ms) and novel stimuli (~250 ms) were unique environmental sounds (e.g., dog bark) used in prior studies of the novelty P300. Subjects were instructed to respond to the target sounds by pressing a button using their dominant hand index finger. The standard stimuli were 20, 30 or 40 Hz click trains (500 ms) in the first, second, and third runs, respectively. The auditory steady state EEG driving data obtained from these standard stimuli will be presented in a separate report. All stimuli were presented at 80 dB SPL.

daily

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mismatch Negativity (MMN) Intensity
Time Frame: daily

Mismatch Negativity (MMN) Intensity difference waves at midline electrodes (Fz, Cz and Pz).

The frequent standard tones were of 75 ms duration with 5 ms rise and fall time, and were composed of 500, 1000, and 1500 Hz sinusoidal partials (harmonics) that resulted in a single high pitched beep sound.

All tones were presented at 76 dB sound pressure level (SPL) with the exception of intensity deviants. The three deviants were distinguishable from standard tones in either intensity, frequency, or duration.

Subjects performed a visual discrimination distractor task during the MMN runs and were instructed to ignore the tones.

The mismatch negativity (MMN) measure included 3 types of deviant tones (stimuli) that the subjects heard: 1. Frequency deviant, 2. Intensity deviant, 3. Duration deviant. The response to these 3 types of deviants were recorded in the EEG. Therefore each deviant was associated with different waves which we measured in amplitude (microvolts)

daily
Mismatch Negativity (MMN) Frequency
Time Frame: daily

Mismatch Negativity (MMN) Frequency difference waves at midline electrodes (Fx, Cz and Pz).

The frequent standard tones were of 75 ms duration with 5 ms rise and fall time, and were composed of 500, 1000, and 1500 Hz sinusoidal partials (harmonics) that resulted in a single high pitched beep sound.

All tones were presented at 76 dB sound pressure level (SPL) with the exception of intensity deviants. The three deviants were distinguishable from standard tones in either intensity, frequency, or duration.

Subjects performed a visual discrimination distractor task during the MMN runs and were instructed to ignore the tones.

The mismatch negativity (MMN) measure included 3 types of deviant tones (stimuli) that the subjects heard: 1. Frequency deviant, 2. Intensity deviant, 3. Duration deviant. The response to these 3 types of deviants were recorded in the EEG. Therefore each deviant was associated with different waves which we measured in amplitude (microvolts)

daily
Mismatch Negativity (MMN) Duration
Time Frame: daily

Mismatch Negativity (MMN) Duration difference waves at midline electrodes (Fz, Cz and Pz).

The frequent standard tones were of 75 ms duration with 5 ms rise and fall time, and were composed of 500, 1000, and 1500 Hz sinusoidal partials (harmonics) that resulted in a single high pitched beep sound.

All tones were presented at 76 dB sound pressure level (SPL) with the exception of intensity deviants. The three deviants were distinguishable from standard tones in either intensity, frequency, or duration.

Subjects performed a visual discrimination distractor task during the MMN runs and were instructed to ignore the tones.

The mismatch negativity (MMN) measure included 3 types of deviant tones (stimuli) that the subjects heard: 1. Frequency deviant, 2. Intensity deviant, 3. Duration deviant. The response to these 3 types of deviants were recorded in the EEG. Therefore each deviant was associated with different waves which we measured in amplitude (microvolts)

daily

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Handan Gunduz-Bruce, M.D., Yale School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

February 11, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 8, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2015

Last Verified

May 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Dysfunction

Clinical Trials on N-acetylcysteine and ketamine

3
Subscribe