Romiplostim Treatment of Thrombocytopenia in Subjects With Low or Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)
A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Romiplostim Treatment of Thrombocytopenia in Subjects With Low or Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 2
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Romiplostim
Weekly subcutaneous dosing based on platelet count for 26 weeks during the Test Treatment Period and for 24 weeks during the Extended Treatment Period, separated by a 4-week interim washout period.
Starting dose is at 750 μg, up to a maximum dose of 1000 μg, or reduced to a minimum of 250 μg.
|
Romiplostim is supplied in a 5 mL single use glass vial as a sterile, white, preservative-free, lyophilized powder.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Weekly subcutaneous dosing with blinded matching placebo dose level for 26 weeks during the Test Treatment Period and for 24 weeks during the Extended Treatment Period, separated by a 4-week interim washout period.
|
Placebo is supplied in a 5 mL single use glass vial as a sterile, white, preservative-free, lyophilized powder.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Clinically Significant Bleeding Events
Time Frame: Test Treatment Period (Weeks 1-26)
|
A clinically significant bleeding event is defined as any bleeding event of grade ≥ 2 per the modified World Health Organization (WHO) bleeding scale: • Grade 0 = no bleeding • Grade 1 = petechia or mucosal or retinal bleeding not requiring intervention • Grade 2 = melena, hematemesis, hematuria, hemoptysis • Grade 3 = bleeding required red cell transfusion • Grade 4 = retinal bleeding with visual impairment • Grade 5 = non-fatal cerebral bleeding • Grade 6 = fatal cerebral bleeding • Grade 7 = fatal non-cerebral bleeding.
Bleeding events that continue for more than 7 days were counted as separate events every eighth day.
Multiple events that arose from one organ system on one day were collapsed into one single event.
Bleeding events with a start date between the first dose date and the last dose date of the test treatment period+7 days are included.
|
Test Treatment Period (Weeks 1-26)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Annualized Rate of Platelet Transfusion Events
Time Frame: Test Treatment Period (Weeks 1-26)
|
A discrete platelet transfusion is any number of platelet transfusion administered within a 3-day period.
Transfusions administered more than 3 days apart are counted as separate events.
Transfusion given in the absence of any bleeding, when platelet count is >10x10^9/L, is not counted as a platelet transfusion event.
Events with start date between the first dose date and the last dose date of the test treatment period +7 days are included.
Exposure adjusted event rate per 100 patient-years = (events / patient-years * 100).
Patient Year = total patient years of exposure to investigational product during 26 weeks test treatment period.
|
Test Treatment Period (Weeks 1-26)
|
|
Annualized Rate of Overall Bleeding Events
Time Frame: Test Treatment Period (Weeks 1-26)
|
The time from first dose of study drug to the last dose of 26-week test treatment period.
A bleeding event is defined as any bleeding event reported during the test treatment period.
Bleeding events that continue for more than 7 days are counted as separate events every eighth day.
Multiple events that arose from one organ system on one day are collapsed into one single event.
Exposure adjusted event rate per 100 patient-years = events / patient-year * 100).
|
Test Treatment Period (Weeks 1-26)
|
|
Annualized Rate of Total Platelet Transfusion Units
Time Frame: Test Treatment Period (Weeks 1-26)
|
The time from first dose of study drug to the last dose of 26-week test treatment period.
A unit of platelets is defined as a single pack of pooled platelet-rich plasma comprised of 6 to 8 individual platelet concentrate packs (200 to 400 mL), a single pack of pooled buffy-coat concentrate, or 1 apheresis (single donor) concentrate.
Exposure adjusted event rate per 100 patient-years = events / patient-years * 100.
|
Test Treatment Period (Weeks 1-26)
|
|
Number of Participants With Platelet Hematologic Improvement (HI-P)
Time Frame: Test Treatment Period (Weeks 1-26)
|
Platelet Hematologic Improvemen defined by the international working group (IWG) as: an absolute increase in platelet count of ≥ 30 x 10^9/L for a patient starting with a platelet count of ≥ 20 x 10^9/L or an increase in platelet count from < 20 x 10^9/L to ≥ 20 x 10^9/L and by at least 100% in a patient that started with a platelet count < 20 x 10^9/L.
To account for any possible contribution from platelet transfusions, platelet counts within 3 days following administration of platelet transfusion is not counted towards the platelet hematologic improvement endpoint.
If no platelet measurements are available on the weekly scheduled dose day, then that week is not counted towards the platelet hematologic improvement endpoint.
|
Test Treatment Period (Weeks 1-26)
|
|
Exposure-adjusted Total Duration of Platelet Hematologic Improvement (HI-P) in the Absence of Platelet Transfusions
Time Frame: Test Treatment Period (Weeks 1-26)
|
Duration for participants who did not report HI-P during the period is 0. A platelet hematologic improvement (HI-P) is defined by an MDS International Working criteria as patients with a baseline platelet count of ≥ 20 x 10^9/L achieving an absolute increase of ≥ 30 x 10^9/L or increasing the platelet count to above 20 x 10^9/L and by at least 100% in patients with a baseline of < 20 x 10^9/L for at least 8 consecutive weeks.
To account for any possible contribution from platelet transfusions, platelet counts within 3 days following administration of platelet transfusion is not counted towards the platelet hematologic improvement endpoint.
If no platelet measurements are available on the weekly scheduled dose day, then that week is not counted towards the platelet hematologic improvement endpoint.
The durations of HI-P are cumulative if more than one incidence occurred.
Exposure adjusted event rate per 100 patient-weeks = total number of weeks / patient-weeks * 100.
|
Test Treatment Period (Weeks 1-26)
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died
Time Frame: From randomization to 58 weeks, the end of study visit or the closest available follow-up information up to 58 weeks from the long term follow-up for those who discontinued the study early, with a data cut-off date of 20 July 2012.
|
From randomization to 58 weeks, the end of study visit or the closest available follow-up information up to 58 weeks from the long term follow-up for those who discontinued the study early, with a data cut-off date of 20 July 2012.
|
|
|
Time to Death
Time Frame: From randomization to 58 weeks, the end of study visit or the closest available follow-up information up to 58 weeks from the long term follow-up for those who discontinued the study early, with a data cut-off date of 20 July 2012.
|
Overall survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods.
For patients who discontinued early, additional information from the long term follow-up are added (closest available follow-up information up to 58 weeks).
|
From randomization to 58 weeks, the end of study visit or the closest available follow-up information up to 58 weeks from the long term follow-up for those who discontinued the study early, with a data cut-off date of 20 July 2012.
|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Survival at Month 12
Time Frame: Month 12, with a data cut-off date of 20 July 2012.
|
Overall survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods.
|
Month 12, with a data cut-off date of 20 July 2012.
|
|
Annualized Rate of Patient-reported Bleeding Events
Time Frame: Test Treatment Period (Weeks 1-26)
|
The number of bleeding events was obtained from the thrombocytopenia symptoms (Th-symptoms) survey.
Patients reported spontaneous bleeding to have occurred 0, 1 or 2, 3 or 4, 5 or 6, or 7 or more times in the past week.
The lower threshold of bleeding counts is used for conservative purposes (i.e., the "3" is used for the response option of "3 or 4 times").
Exposure adjusted event rate per 100 patient-years = number of events / patient-year * 100.
|
Test Treatment Period (Weeks 1-26)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Diao G, Zeng D, Hu K, Ibrahim JG. Modeling event count data in the presence of informative dropout with application to bleeding and transfusion events in myelodysplastic syndrome. Stat Med. 2017 Sep 30;36(22):3475-3494. doi: 10.1002/sim.7351. Epub 2017 May 30.
- Kantarjian HM, Fenaux P, Sekeres MA, Szer J, Platzbecker U, Kuendgen A, Gaidano G, Wiktor-Jedrzejczak W, Carpenter N, Mehta B, Franklin J, Giagounidis A. Long-term follow-up for up to 5 years on the risk of leukaemic progression in thrombocytopenic patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes treated with romiplostim or placebo in a randomised double-blind trial. Lancet Haematol. 2018 Mar;5(3):e117-e126. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30016-4. Epub 2018 Jan 26.
- Giagounidis A, Mufti GJ, Fenaux P, Sekeres MA, Szer J, Platzbecker U, Kuendgen A, Gaidano G, Wiktor-Jedrzejczak W, Hu K, Woodard P, Yang AS, Kantarjian HM. Results of a randomized, double-blind study of romiplostim versus placebo in patients with low/intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and thrombocytopenia. Cancer. 2014 Jun 15;120(12):1838-46. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28663. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
- Platzbecker U, Sekeres MA, Kantarjian H, Giagounidis A, Mufti GJ, Jia C, Yang AS, Fenaux P. Relationship of different platelet response criteria and patient outcomes in a romiplostim myelodysplastic syndromes trial. Leukemia. 2014 Dec;28(12):2418-21. doi: 10.1038/leu.2014.253. Epub 2014 Sep 2. No abstract available.
- Sekeres MA, Giagounidis A, Kantarjian H, Mufti GJ, Fenaux P, Jia C, Yang AS, Platzbecker U. Development and validation of a model to predict platelet response to romiplostim in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol. 2014 Nov;167(3):337-45. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13037. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
- Diao G, Zeng D, Hu K, Ibrahim JG. Semiparametric frailty models for zero-inflated event count data in the presence of informative dropout. Biometrics. 2019 Dec;75(4):1168-1178. doi: 10.1111/biom.13085. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 20060198
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.