Methylation of p16 CpG Island And Malignant Transformation of Oral Epithelial Dysplasia

May 7, 2015 updated by: Dajun Deng, Peking University

A Cohort Study on Prediction of Malignant Transformation of Oral Epithelial Dysplasia by p16 Methylation

Oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) is one of the common precancerous lesions among Chinese adults. Biomarker is not available for detection of malignant potential of OED till now. p16 is an important tumor suppressor gene, which is inactivated frequently by methylation of CpG island in early stage of carcinogenesis. The present cohort study is to investigate whether p16 methylation is correlated with malignant transformation of OED.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

  • Background: Identification of malignant potential of oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) is virtually impossible on histopathological grounds alone. Inactivation of p16 gene by CpG methylation is an early frequent event during oral carcinogenesis. To investigate the predictive value of p16 methylation on malignant potential in OED, we carried out the prospective cohort study.
  • Methods: 101 patients with histologically confirmed mild or moderate OED were included in the present study. Baseline information of p16 methylation status of the OED lesions from 93 cases was obtained by methylation-specific PCR. Progression of the OEDs lesions was examined in 78 cases histologically during the 45.8 months double-blind followup survey (78/93). The association between p16 methylation and progression of OED was analyzed with SPSS13.0 software. All P-values were two-sided.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
93

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Beijing, China, 100081
        • Department of Oral Medicine, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

101 patients with mild or moderate OED were selected from cases with oral leukoplakia, lichen planus, or chronic discoid erythematosus at Peking University School of Stomatology between 1995 and 2005. All of the patients with OED had been diagnosed pathologically by at least two senior pathologists using the criteria from '2005 WHO Classification System' (Gale et al, 2005). All cases involved primary lesions without any LASER, radiation therapy or chemotherapy. p16 methylation status of OED samples was analyzed with methylation-specific PCR combined with denatured high performance liquid chromatography (Sun et al, 2004). 93 eligible cases with p16-methylated or p16-unmethylated OED were enrolled into the cohort study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • histological diagnosis of mild or moderate grade OED; and
  • enough amount of tissue sample from OED lesion for genomic DNA extraction; and
  • available of methylation status of p16 CpG island in the extracted DNA sample.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • histological diagnosis of severe grade OED or malignant disease; or
  • amount of tissue sample is not enough for preparation of genomic DNA (20ng); or
  • quality of the prepared DNA is not good enough for detection of p16 methylation; or
  • OED treatment history by LASER, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
p16-methylated
patients with mild or moderate oral epithelial dysplasia containing methylated p16 CpG island.
p16-unmethylated
patients with mild or moderate oral epithelial dysplasia NOT containing methylated p16 CpG island.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Number of Participants With Both Clinical and Histological Evidence of Malignant Transformation of Oral Epithelial Dysplasia
Time Frame: from 3 months to 124 months
The follow-up examination was carried out with a 3-month interval. Re-biopsy was done as clinically indicated, e.g. the lesion recurs or has tendency for malignant development. Pathologic diagnosis was made by at least two pathologists without the knowledge of baseline p16 methylation, based on the World Health Organization's criteria, at Peking University School of Stomatology. The number of participants with malignant transformation of oral dysplasia was calculated based on the number of participants with oral dysplasia progressed to carcinoma by the end of the trial in each cohorts.
from 3 months to 124 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Cancer-free Survival Time for Patients With Oral Epithelial Dysplasia
Time Frame: from 3 months to 124 months
from 3 months to 124 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Peking University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Dajun Deng, MD, Beijing Cancer Hospital/ Institue, Peking University School of Oncology
  • Principal Investigator: Hongwei Liu, MD, PhD, Peking University School of Stomatology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2005

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2008

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 2, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 2, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 3, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 1, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 7, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CPDHS-434

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Oral Epithelial Dysplasia, Mild or Moderate Grade

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings