Efficacy and Safety of Valsartan/Amlodipine in Patients With Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension

May 18, 2011 updated by: Novartis

A Multi-national, Multi-center, Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Valsartan/Amlodipine 160/5 mg to Valsartan 160 mg Alone in Patients With Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension Not Adequately Controlled With Valsartan 160 mg Monotherapy

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of the valsartan/amlodipine 160/5 mg single-pill combination in patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension not adequately controlled (MSDBP ≥90 mmHg and <110 mmHg) on valsartan 160 mg alone.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
932

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

        • Investigative site in Romainia
        • Novartis Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must give written informed consent
  • Male or female ages 18 or older and less than 86 years

  • Diagnosed as having essential diastolic hypertension, as follows:

    • Visit 2/Single-blind run-in entry, all participants MUST have a MSDBP ≥ 95 mmHg and < 100 mmHg
    • At Visit 3/Core double-blind treatment period entry, all patients MUST have a MSDBP >=90 mmHg and <110 mmHg

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe hypertension
  • Evidence of secondary form of hypertension (coarctation of the aorta, hyperaldosteronism, unilateral or bilateral renal artery stenosis, Cushing's disease, pheochromocytoma or polycystic kidney disease )
  • Malignant hypertension
  • Administration of any agent indicated for the treatment of hypertension after Visit 1
  • Known moderate or malignant retinopathy.
  • Known or suspected contraindications, including history of allergy or hypersensitivity to Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (ARBs), Calcium Channel Blockers (CCBs), or to drugs with similar chemical structures
  • History of hypertensive encephalopathy, cerebrovascular accident, or transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction or all types of revascularization, angina pectoris of any type, including unstable angina
  • History of heart failure Grade II-IV according to New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification
  • Second of third degree heart block regardless of the use of a pacemaker, concomitant potentially life-threatening arrhythmia or symptomatic arrhythmia

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Valsartan 160 mg
One capsule Valsartan 160 mg and 1 tablet placebo to Valsartan/Amlodipine taken orally once daily at approximately 9:00 AM for 8 weeks
Drug: Valsartan 160 mg
Valsartan 160 mg capsule taken orally once daily.
Other Names:
  • Diovan® 160mg
Drug: Placebo
1 capsule or tablet taken orally once daily
Experimental: Valsartan/amlodipine 160/5 mg
One film-coated tablet Valsartan/amlodipine 160/5 mg and 1 capsule Placebo to Valsartan taken orally once daily at approximately 9:00 AM for 8 weeks
Drug: Placebo
1 capsule or tablet taken orally once daily
Drug: Valsartan/amlodipine 160/5 mg
Valsartan/amlodipine 160/5mg film coated tablets taken orally once daily.
Other Names:
  • Exforge® 160/5mg
Other: Single-Blind Run-In Valsartan 160 mg
Single-Blind Run-In treatment with one capsule Valsartan 160 mg taken orally once daily at approximately 9:00 AM for 4 weeks.
Drug: Valsartan 160 mg
Valsartan 160 mg capsule taken orally once daily.
Other Names:
  • Diovan® 160mg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (MSDBP) From Baseline to Week 8 Endpoint
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
Three arterial blood pressure (BP) determinations were made after the participant was in the sitting position for 5 minutes according to the American Heart Association guidelines using a calibrated standard aneroid or mercury sphygmomanometer or a calibrated standard sphygmomanometer. The change in the MSDBP was calculated comparing the Week 8 readings to the readings taken at Baseline. The change from baseline in MSDBP was analyzed using an analysis of covariance model (ANCOVA) with treatment and center (pooled as appropriate) as factors and centered baseline MSDBP as a covariate.
Baseline and Week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (MSSBP) From Baseline to Week 8 Endpoint
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
Three arterial blood pressure (BP) determinations were made after the participant was in the sitting position for 5 minutes according to the American Heart Association guidelines using a calibrated standard aneroid or mercury sphygmomanometer or a calibrated standard sphygmomanometer. The change in the MSSBP was calculated comparing the Week 8 readings to the readings taken at Baseline. The change from baseline in MSSBP was analyzed using an analysis of covariance model (ANCOVA) with treatment and center (pooled as appropriate) as factors and centered baseline MSSBP as a covariate
Baseline and Week 8
Percentage of Participants With a Diastolic Blood Pressure Response at 8 Week Endpoint
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
The percentage of participants with a Diastolic Blood Pressure Response defined as the percentage of participants with a Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (MSDBP) < 90 mmHg or a >= 10 mmHg reduction from baseline.
Baseline and Week 8
Percentage of Participants With Diastolic Blood Pressure Control at 8 Week Endpoint
Time Frame: Week 8
The percentage of participants with Diastolic Blood Pressure Control defined as the percentage of participants with a Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (MSDBP) < 90 mmHg.
Week 8
Percentage of Participants With Overall Blood Pressure Control at 8 Week Endpoint
Time Frame: Week 8
The percentage of participants with Overall Blood Pressure Control defined as the percentage of participants with a Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (MSSBP)/Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (MSDBP) < 140/90 mmHg.
Week 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Novartis

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 15, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 23, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 26, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 24, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 18, 2011

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CVAA489A2317

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings