Study of Nitazoxanide in Adults With Acute Uncomplicated Influenza

April 3, 2018 updated by: Romark Laboratories L.C.

A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Nitazoxanide in Adults With Acute Uncomplicated Influenza

This is a randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate oral nitazoxanide compared to a placebo in the treatment of acute uncomplicated influenza in adults. We hypothesize that treatment with nitazoxanide will reduce the duration of symptoms in patients with confirmed influenza infection. Secondarily, we hypothesize that treatment with nitazoxanide will reduce the complications of influenza, severity of symptoms, time lost from work, time to return to normal daily activities, and viral shedding.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The study is conducted at approximately 25 sites in the United States. Subjects selected based on symptoms will be randomized to receive oral nitazoxanide or placebo twice daily for 5 days. Subjects will be monitored by daily by telephone or home visit to monitor symptoms and complications of influenza for safety and will be referred for medical care as required. Subjects will complete a diary twice daily to record the presence and severity of symptoms, ability to perform normal daily activities and time lost from work. Complications of influenza (including sinusitis, otitis, bronchitis, pneumonia, central nervous system disease) and other adverse events will be reported. Nasopharyngeal swabs will be collected at Baseline (Day 0) and Day 7 for all patients and on Days 1 through 4 for a subset of patients to test for influenza A (including novel H1N1), influenza B and 17 other respiratory viruses by RT-PCR and culture and to evaluate quantitative viral shedding. The primary analysis will be for patients with confirmed influenza, and secondary analyses will be conducted for subjects with any respiratory virus and for all treated subjects.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
79

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • Elmira, New York, United States, 14901
        • Health Sciences Research Center at Asthma and Allergy Associates, P.C.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 to 65 years
  • Fever, respiratory symptoms and constitutional symptoms compatible with influenza infection
  • Influenza A or B infection in the local community
  • Onset of illness no more than 48 hours before presentation
  • Willing and able to provide comply with protocol requirements

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severity of illness requiring or anticipated to require in-hospital care
  • High risk of complications from influenza per IDSA (Infectious Diseases Society of America) guidelines or current CDC (Centers for Disease Control) criteria
  • Females pregnant, breast-feeding or sexually active without birth control
  • Vaccination for seasonal influenza or H1N1 on or after August 1, 2009
  • Treatment with antiviral medication for influenza within 1 month prior to screening
  • Treatment with nitazoxanide or any investigational drug within 1 month prior to screening
  • Known sensitivity to nitazoxanide or any excipients
  • Unable to take oral medications
  • Chronic kidney or liver disease or known impaired hepatic and/or renal function
  • Other pre-existing chronic infection undergoing or requiring medical therapy
  • Pre-existing illness placing subject at unreasonably increased risk by participation in study
  • Unlikely to comply with the requirements of this protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Drug: Placebo
Tablet, twice daily with food for 5 days
Other Names:
  • Sugar pill
Active Comparator: Nitazoxanide
Drug: Nitazoxanide
Tablet, 500 mg with food twice daily for 5 days
Other Names:
  • Alinia, NTZ

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time to Resolution of All Clinical Symptoms of Influenza (Subjects With Confirmed Influenza Infection)
Time Frame: Up to 28 days
Up to 28 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Resolution of All Clinical Symptoms of Influenza (Subjects Infected With Any Respiratory Virus)
Time Frame: Up to 28 days
Up to 28 days
Time to Resolution of All Clinical Symptoms of Influenza (All Treated Subjects)
Time Frame: Up to 28 days
Up to 28 days
Time to Return to Normal Daily Activity (Subjects With Confirmed Influenza)
Time Frame: Up to 28 days
Up to 28 days
Overall Severity of Disease Score
Time Frame: Up to 14 days
Subjects recorded a severity score for 10 flu symptoms on a 0-3 scale BID for 7-14 days.The severity score for each symptom was multiplied by the number of hours scored at that severity for the entire time the subject maintained a diary (a sneezing score of 1 for 12 hours and 0 for 10 hours =1*12 + 0*10=12). This is symptom severity score*hours.Symptom severity score*hours for each of the symptoms were added for an overall symptom severity score*hours (if symptom severity score*hours for 10 symptoms were 12, 10, 9, 8, 7, 10, 10, 10, 5, 5, overall symptom severity score*hours=86).Overall symptom severity score*hours were divided by the number of hours that the subject kept a diary for a standardized continuous measure of severity of the course of illness (if overall symptom severity score*hours=86 and the subject maintained a diary for 100 hours Overall Severity of Disease Score=0.86). Overall Severity of Disease Score can range 0-30 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Up to 14 days
Time Lost From Work (Subjects With Confirmed Influenza)
Time Frame: Up to 28 days
Up to 28 days
Complications of Influenza Including Secondary Illnesses, Antibiotic Use and Hospitalizations (Subjects With Confirmed Influenza)
Time Frame: Up to 28 days
Up to 28 days
Time to Cessation of Viral Shedding (Subjects With Confirmed Influenza)
Time Frame: 28 days
28 days
Change in Influenza Virus Titer Assessed by Quantitative RT-PCR (Subjects With Confirmed Influenza)
Time Frame: 4 days
4 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Romark Laboratories L.C.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Jean-François Rossignol, MD, PhD, The Romark Institute for Medical Research

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 23, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 25, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 26, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 5, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 3, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RM01-2027

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings