Observational Study of Incidence Rates of Esophageal Cancer in Women Taking Medications for the Prevention or Treatment of Osteoporosis (MK-0217A-352)

February 1, 2022 updated by: Organon and Co

The Risk of Esophageal Cancer in Relation to the Treatment and Prevention of Osteoporosis in Women

This is a 2-phase retrospective database study, using both case-cohort and inception (intention-to-treat) cohort analyses to evaluate any association between oral treatments for osteoporosis and the risk of esophageal cancer in women.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
684815

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Women who have at least two years of experience in the GPRD and are 55 or older between 1996 and 2008; all cases of esophageal cancer were identified and matched to all women in the comparison sample (all women with same year of birth drawn from the random subsample of 25,000).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cases:

    • Women in the database aged 55 or older between 1996 and 2008 with diagnosis of esophageal cancer

  • Comparator Controls:

    • Each case was matched to all women in the random subcohort of 25,000 who had the same year of birth as the case and were in the database at the time of diagnosis.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women with diagnosis of any other cancer or Paget's Disease or who have received oral or intravenous steroids before the index date

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Esophageal Cancer Cases
Participants with any United Kingdom General Practice Research Database (GPRD) Medical code for esophageal cancer (cases). Cases were confirmed and case onset dates determined by electronic algorithm (based on electronic medical record data) or by medical record review.
Drug: Alendronate
Other Names:
  • FOSAMAX®
Drug: Raloxifene
Other Names:
  • EVISTA®
Drug: Etidronate
Other Names:
  • DIDRONEL®
Drug: Ibandronate
Other Names:
  • BONIVA®
Drug: Risedronate
Other Names:
  • ACTONEL®
  • ATELVIA®
Comparison Sample (Case-Cohort)
Participants who were matched to cases by age and membership in the GPRD on the case's onset date, and had not experienced any form of esophageal cancer or Paget's Disease and had not received oral or intravenous steroids or chemotherapy or radiotherapy, as indicated by GPRD codes.
Drug: Alendronate
Other Names:
  • FOSAMAX®
Drug: Raloxifene
Other Names:
  • EVISTA®
Drug: Etidronate
Other Names:
  • DIDRONEL®
Drug: Ibandronate
Other Names:
  • BONIVA®
Drug: Risedronate
Other Names:
  • ACTONEL®
  • ATELVIA®
Non-treated Comparators
Participants who did not initiate treatment of osteoporosis with a study drug
Alendronate
Participants initiating treatment for osteoporosis with alendronate
Drug: Alendronate
Other Names:
  • FOSAMAX®
Etidronate
Participants initiating treatment for osteoporosis with etidronate
Drug: Etidronate
Other Names:
  • DIDRONEL®
Ibandronate
Participants initiating treatment for osteoporosis with ibandronate
Drug: Ibandronate
Other Names:
  • BONIVA®
Risedronate
Participants initiating treatment for osteoporosis with risedronate
Drug: Risedronate
Other Names:
  • ACTONEL®
  • ATELVIA®
Raloxifene
Participants initiating treatment for osteoporosis with raloxifene
Drug: Raloxifene
Other Names:
  • EVISTA®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Exposure to Study Drugs (Case-Cohort Analysis)
Time Frame: Exposure to study drug at least 720 days before disease onset
To determine the use of study drugs (alendronate, etidronate, ibandronate, risedronate, and raloxifene) among female participants with esophageal cancer (cases) and a comparison subcohort, a case-cohort analysis was performed using women meeting criteria from the General Practice Research Database (GPRD, United Kingdom). Exposure to osteoporosis drugs administered 720 days before cancer onset was determined in cases and compared to contemporaneous assessments in a comparison subcohort matched by year of birth and membership in the GPRD on the case's onset date. Cases were confirmed and case onset dates determined by electronic algorithm (based on electronic medical record data) or by medical record review.
Exposure to study drug at least 720 days before disease onset
Number of Cases of Esophageal Cancer Per 100,000 Woman-Years (Intent-to-Treat Analysis)
Time Frame: Up to approximately 7.3 years of follow-up
To assess the relative risk of esophageal cancer associated with osteoporosis study drugs (alendronate, etidronate, ibandronate, risedronate, and raloxifene), initiators of osteoporosis drugs and non-initiators (comparators, women sharing match criteria with the initiator) entered an inception cohort for every three-month period, beginning in the first quarter of 1996. Assignment to study drug exposure group remained fixed from the start of follow-up, analogous to an intent-to-treat analysis. The risk of esophageal cancer among initiators of study drug compared to non-initiators of study drug was estimated through calculation of a hazard ratio. For calculation of 721+ day hazard ratios, only esophageal cancer cases occurring at least 721 days from initiation of study drug were used. For calculation of 1441+ day hazard ratios, only esophageal cancer cases occurring at least 1441 days from initiation of study drug were used.
Up to approximately 7.3 years of follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Organon and Co

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
World Health Information Science Consultants, LLC

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Alec Walker, MD, DrPH, World Health Information Science Consultants, LLC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 26, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 16, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 16, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 26, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 26, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 1, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 3, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 1, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 0217A-352
  • EP02001.029 (Other Identifier: Merck)
  • 2010_015 (Other Identifier: Merck)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings