Trial of Novel Oral Zinc Cysteine Preparation in Alzheimer's Disease

January 27, 2011 updated by: Adeona Pharmaceuticals

CopperProof-2: Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing the Effects of a Novel Once-Daily Oral Zinc Cysteine Preparation on Zinc and Copper Parameters in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease

This trial aims to test the hypothesis that 1) a single dose of zinc cysteine in a proprietary gastro-retentive form will produce sustained blood levels of zinc giving a larger bioavailable amount of zinc than an FDA approved preparation of inorganic zinc acetate; and 2) that the zinc cysteine gastro-retentive, sustained-release preparation will be better tolerated with significantly less gastrointestinal side effects than the zinc acetate capsules. The trial also tests the hypothesis that, after 6 months of once daily administration, the zinc cysteine subjects will show reduced serum non-ceruloplasmin copper. Additionally, subjects will perform tests of mental function,including the dementia rating scale, the Mini Mental Status Examination and the ADAS-cognitive performance test aimed at Alzheimer's status assessment. Tests will be administered at baseline, 3 and 6 months, and the performance results compared. Care-giver assessments will also be noted.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This multi-center study aims to determine the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a novel gastro-retentive, sustained-release zinc cysteine preparation on the blood and urine measures of copper and zinc balance in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Data expected to be derived include tolerability of the novel preparation in comparison with oral inorganic zinc salt, and long-term effects on primarily blood-measured copper-zinc balance. The study design is that of a prospective, randomized, double blind placebo-controlled clinical trial, with a duration for individual subjects of 6 months. The study will be performed at a total of 3 sites, under the direction of a single principal investigator, with a sub-investigator. The statistical plan calls for a comparison of data from the two long-term parallel groups using ANOVA and other applicable techniques. In addition to blood parameters, mental function assessments obtained at baseline, 3 and 6 months will be evaluated statistically.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Clearwater, Florida, United States, 33756
        • Neuroscience Research Unit
      • Holiday, Florida, United States, 34691
        • ATIT Neurology
      • Port Richey, Florida, United States, 34668
        • The Cottages

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years to 90 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Alzheimer's disease mild to moderate as diagnosed by standard clinical, functional and NINDA-ADRDA criteria
  • Mild cognitive impairment diagnosed by standard clinical, functional and NINDA-ADRDA criteria
  • All subjects able to swallow Tablets
  • Subjects taking copper or zinc containing supplements must have a 30-day wash out before starting study materials
  • Screening laboratory values either within normal limits or deemed not clinically significant by investigator

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects or their study companions/care givers unable to give adequate informed consent
  • Presence of a disease or condition known to affect biometal homeostasis
  • Presence of psychosis, substance abuse or other major medical or neurological issues
  • Presence of vascular dementia
  • Clinically significant anemia at the time of the screening visit
  • Current use of a decoppering drug such as trientine or penicillamine

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Gastro-retentive zinc cysteine tablet
Once daily administration by mouth of a gastro-retentive, sustained-release preparation of zinc cysteine with excipients, all G.R.A.S., with adequate water.
Other: Gastro-retentive zinc cysteine tablet
Oral, one tablet, once daily with water for 6 months.
Other Names:
  • Zinthionein ZC
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Identical appearance of placebo with active comparator
Once daily administration of placebo of identical physical appearance to that of active comparator with similar amount of water.
Other: Tablet identical physically to active comparator containing some lactose
Oral, once daily, with water, 6 months.
Other Names:
  • Placebo Tablet

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Biometal levels will be measured in serum by atomic absorption spectrometry
Time Frame: 6 to 12 months
Active comparator material orally administered will be associated with better tolerability than oral zinc acetate, and will produce a reduction in serum non-ceruloplasmin bound copper levels and an elevation in serum zinc levels
6 to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serum zinc levels after oral administration of two different zinc-containing compounds and placebo will be determined by atomic absorption spectrometry
Time Frame: 3 months
The change in serum zinc levels over time after oral administration of the active comparator of the study as well as the placebo and for certain subjects an inorganic zinc salt will be compared
3 months
Comparison of mental status functions at baseline, 3 and 6 months in active comparator versus placebo groups.
Time Frame: 6 to 12 months
All subjects will perform standard and standardized tests of mental function, ranging from a general dementia rating scale (Mini Mental Status Exam) to more Alzheimer's specific tests (ADAS-cognitive). Daily living and caregiver assessments of overall daily functioning will be noted. Test results will be compared statistically in a two-point fashion, and correlated with biometal ststus.
6 to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Adeona Pharmaceuticals

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: David Newsome, M.D., Senior Vice President of Research and Development, Adeona Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2011

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 30, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 5, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 7, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 28, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 27, 2011

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CopperProof-2

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings