Congenital Heart Adolescents: Program of Transition Evaluation Research (CHAPTER)
Evaluation of Novel Transition Interventions for Youth With Congenital Heart Disease
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Alberta
-
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2B7
- Stollery Children'S Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 15-17
- Followed in the Stollery Pediatric Cardiology Clinic or the Northern Alberta Adult Congenital (NAACH) clinic
- Moderate or Complex Congenital Heart Disease (as defined by the 2001 Bethesda guidelines) or Acquired Heart Disease (cardiomyopathy (dilated, hypertrophic, or restrictive forms), Marfan's syndrome or rheumatic heart disease with cardiac involvement)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Developmental Delay, reading level below grade 6 based on patient or parent report
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Clinic-based Educational Intervention
This will involve a 60 minute interaction between the teen and an advanced practice nurse (APN) in the cardiology clinic.
A MyHealth passport will be created covering the name of the teen's cardiac condition, previous cardiac interventions, and name and purpose of the teen's medications.
Potential late cardiac complications and contact names and location of local adult CHD cardiologists will also be reviewed.
Three scenarios regarding adolescent risk taking behaviors (written in the 3rd person) will be presented to the teen who will be asked what advice he/she would offer to the teen in each of those scenarios.
The teen will be given a study email address and encouraged to contact the APN by email or text messaging with follow-up questions.
If no contact is initiated after 1 week, the APN will email or text (based on preference) the youth, to discuss additional questions.
|
This will involve a 60 minute interaction between the teen and an advanced practice nurse (APN) in the cardiology clinic.
A MyHealth passport will be created covering the name of the teen's cardiac condition, previous cardiac interventions, and name and purpose of the teen's medications.
Potential late cardiac complications and contact names and location of local adult CHD cardiologists will also be reviewed.
Three scenarios regarding adolescent risk taking behaviors (written in the 3rd person) will be presented to the teen who will be asked what advice he/she would offer to the teen in each of those scenarios.
The teen will be given a study email address and encouraged to contact the APN by email or text messaging with follow-up questions.
If no contact is initiated after 1 week, the APN will email or text (based on preference) the youth, to discuss additional questions.
|
|
No Intervention: Usual Care
Youth seen in the Cardiology clinic see a nurse only to measure weight, height, and blood pressure.
They rely on their cardiologist for information about their heart condition.
The approach and amount of time taken by each cardiologist with a youth varies.
Time-pressured clinic visits limit the opportunity to discuss many of the topics noted above.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire (TRAQ) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month and 6 months
|
The TRAQ is the most rigorously evaluated transition readiness questionnaire available and was developed in the USA.
It has 29 items with two domains, self-management (16 items) and self-advocacy (13 ).
The TRAQ is at a grade 5.7 reading level and uses a Likert scale.
Each item is scored 1-5, with 1 being assigned for responses of "No, I do not know how" and a score of 5 assigned for responses of "Yes, I always do this when I need to."
The TRAQ scores produced include an overall score and a subscale score.
The overall score and the subscale scores are calculated simply by taking the average score across the items in the questionnaire (or subscale).
The higher the score, the greater the perceived self-management or self-advocacy skills of the participant.
The lower scores indicate the participant has a lower perceived level of self-management or self-advocacy.
|
Baseline, 1 month and 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
MyHeart Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month and 6 months
|
Change in patient knowledge of his/her CHD (MyHeart score), comparing baseline to 1 month and 6 months follow-up.
The MyHeart scale was developed for this study and has a grade 4.6 reading level.
It consists of seven short answer or multiple-choice questions.
Given the heterogeneity of prior medical and surgical interventions and need for medications in adolescents with heart disease, the denominator for some questions varied from one participant to the next.
Accordingly, each participant was assigned a percentage correct score (numerator/denominator×100) at each time point.
Higher percentage correct score reflects better patient knowledge of his/her CHD
|
Baseline, 1 month and 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Andrew S Mackie, MD, SM, University of Alberta
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Warnes CA, Liberthson R, Danielson GK, Dore A, Harris L, Hoffman JI, Somerville J, Williams RG, Webb GD. Task force 1: the changing profile of congenital heart disease in adult life. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Apr;37(5):1170-5. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01272-4. No abstract available.
- Sawicki GS, Lukens-Bull K, Yin X, Demars N, Huang IC, Livingood W, Reiss J, Wood D. Measuring the transition readiness of youth with special healthcare needs: validation of the TRAQ--Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire. J Pediatr Psychol. 2011 Mar;36(2):160-71. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp128. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
- Mackie AS, Islam S, Magill-Evans J, Rankin KN, Robert C, Schuh M, Nicholas D, Vonder Muhll I, McCrindle BW, Yasui Y, Rempel GR. Healthcare transition for youth with heart disease: a clinical trial. Heart. 2014 Jul;100(14):1113-8. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305748. Epub 2014 May 19.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- AM-Chapter-01
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.