Pilot Imaging Study With 89Zr-Trastuzumab in HER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients (IJBMNZrT003)

March 7, 2017 updated by: Jules Bordet Institute

Pilot Imaging Study With 89Zr-Trastuzumab in HER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients : Correlation With FDG-PET/CT and Anatomopathological Results

Evaluation of the diagnostic potential of HER2 imaging using zirconium 89 labelled trastuzumab.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is the first belgian feasibility study of HER2 imaging using a labelled monoclonal antibody, namely trastuzumab labelled with zirconium 89.

The aims of this study are:

I/ Evaluate the diagnostic potential of HER2 imaging using zirconium 89 labelled trastuzumab (based on the Groningen experience), through the analysis of the correlation between the FDG-PET/CT and the HER2 immunoPET.

II/ PET quantification of HER2 receptor by using the images and the blood pharmacokinetic of the tracer.

III/ In the subset of patients for whom biopsies of metastatic sites have not been carried out previously and are of an easy access, tissue will be acquired as part of the validation of the HER2 immunoPET and as an attempt to better understand the molecular heterogeneity of HER2 positive breast cancer at the time of relapse.

IV/Evaluate the concentration of circulating HER2 extracellular domain in the blood and study his possible role as on imaging quality

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Belgium
      • Brussels, Belgium, 1000
        • Jules Bordet Institut

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. All patients selected for this imaging study are patients scheduled to start trastuzumab-based therapy for advanced HER2 positive breast cancer (This includes trastuzumab alone, trastuzumab + chemotherapy, trastuzumab + endocrine therapy).
  2. Histologically confirmed HER 2 positive (defined as FISH amplification ratio more than 2.2) invasive carcinoma of the breast (primary tumor at diagnosis) with locally recurrent or metastatic disease.
  3. Patients with FDG-PET positive metastatic lesions.
  4. Brain metastases are allowed provided they are controlled and they are not the sole site of metastatic disease.
  5. Patient planned to have metastatic site biopsy for HER2 status control.
  6. Age ≥ 18 years
  7. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0 to 1
  8. For women of childbearing potential a pregnancy test will be done and an agreement to use a highly-effective non hormonal form of contraception.
  9. Agreement from the patient to participate in this imaging study and if indicated agreement to biopsy one or two accessible lesions.
  10. Signed written informed consent (approved by the Ethics Committee) obtained prior to any study procedure

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Current severe, uncontrolled systemic disease (e.g., clinically significant cardiovascular, pulmonary, or metabolic disease)
  2. Pregnant or lactating women
  3. Current known infection with HIV, HBV, or HCV
  4. Known severe hypersensitivity to trastuzumab
  5. Assessed by the investigator to be unable or unwilling to comply with the requirements of the protocol
  6. Patients with bone only metastases are not eligible
  7. Psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements
  8. Patients who received lapatinib within the 7 days prior to HER immunoPET/CT.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Zr89-trastuzumab PET/CT
Zr89-trastuzumab PET/CT single arm
Drug: Zr89-trastuzumab
trastuzumab labelled with zirconium 89 for PET/CT
Other Names:
  • HER2 ImmunoPET/CT
  • HER2 receptor imaging
  • Breast cancer molecular imaging

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Test the Diagnostic Accuracy of the HER2 Imaging Using the Labelled Monoclonal Antibody Trastuzumab by Correlating the HER2 PET/CT Imaging With the FDG-PET/CT and Molecular Characterization of Tumor Samples With Discordant Image Findings
Time Frame: 4 years
A visual 'patient-based' classification capturing the whole disease burden was developed by using a side-by-side display, comparing baseline FDG-PET/CT(showing all FDG-positive mets independent of their HER2-imaging status) & day4 HER2-PET/CT. Pts were grouped into 4 HER2-PET/CT patterns according to the proportion of FDG avid tumour load showing relevant 89Zr-T uptake. Pattern A: entire tumor load showed pertinent tracer uptake; B: dominant part of tumour load showed tracer uptake; C: minor part of tumor load showed tracer uptake; D: entire tumor load lacked tracer uptake. Patterns A+B='HER2-positive' & C+D='HER2-negative'. In the 20 pts: 4 pts were classified "A", 5"B", 1"C" & 10"D". This classification indicates substantial heterogeneity of 89Zr-T uptake within this so called 'HER2-positive' pt population. After dichotomization, 11(55%) pts were considered as HER2-PET/CT negative. Furthermore, HER2-PET/CT revealed intrapatient heterogeneity of tumour uptake(pts classified B or C).
4 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time Activity Curve
Time Frame: blood sample at 5, 15, 30, 60 minutes, 1 day, 2 days and 4 or 6 days after tracer injection. Images : Day 0, Day 2 and Day 4 or 6
Time activity curve of normal organ and tumor lesions: pharmacokinetic
blood sample at 5, 15, 30, 60 minutes, 1 day, 2 days and 4 or 6 days after tracer injection. Images : Day 0, Day 2 and Day 4 or 6
HER2 Extracellular Domain
Time Frame: within 60 min before tracer injection
evaluate the concentration of circulating HER2 extracellular domain in the blood and study his possible role as on imaging quality
within 60 min before tracer injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Jules Bordet Institute

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Patrick Flamen, MD, PhD, Jules Bordet Institut

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 8, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 18, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 19, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 18, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 7, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IJBMNZrT003

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Zr89-trastuzumab

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings