Biomarker Study of Elotuzumab in High Risk Smoldering Myeloma

December 21, 2017 updated by: Bristol-Myers Squibb

A Phase 2 Biomarker Study of Elotuzumab (Humanized Anti-CS1 Monoclonal IgG1 Antibody) Monotherapy to Assess the Association Between NK Cell Status and Efficacy in High Risk Smoldering Myeloma

The purpose of this study is to determine whether elotuzumab will improve response in patients with high risk smoldering myeloma who have more CD56^dim cells (a marker for the health of the body's immune system)

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Intervention model: Dosing is sequential

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
41

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92123
        • Sharp Clinical Oncology Research
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06520
        • Yale University School of Medicine
      • West Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06516
        • VA Connecticut Healthcare System
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Winship Cancer Institute.
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • University of Chicago Medical Center
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46260
        • Investigative Clinical Research of Indiana, LLC
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Dana Farber Cancer Institute
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University School of Medicine
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Weill Cornell Medical College
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Mount Sinai Medical Center
    • North Dakota
      • Bismarck, North Dakota, United States, 58501
        • Mid Dakota Clinic, PC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

For more information regarding BMS clinical trial participation, please visit www.BMSStudyConnect.com.

Key Inclusion Criteria:

Participants with a confirmed diagnosis, according to criteria of the International Myeloma Working Group, of smoldering multiple myeloma, considered high risk according to the following:

  • Serum monoclonal (M) protein ≥3 gm/dL and bone marrow plasma cells (BMPC) ≥10% or
  • Serum M protein 1-3 g/dL and BMPC ≥10% and abnormal free light chain ratio of <0.125 or >8.0
  • Urine M protein >200 mg/24 hours, ≥10% BMPC, and serum free light chain ratio ≤0.125 or ≥8.0

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active multiple myeloma
  • Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
  • Active plasma cell leukemia
  • Positive for hepatitis B or C virus or HIV infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Elotuzumab, 20 mg/kg
Intravenous solution administered in 28-day cycles. Cycle 1: Days 1 and 8. Cycle 2 and beyond: Day 1 only.
Biological: Elotuzumab (BMS-901608; HuLuc63)
Experimental: Elotuzumab, 10 mg/kg
Intravenous solution administered in 28-day cycles. Cycle 1 and 2: Days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Cycle 3 and beyond: Days 1 and 15.
Biological: Elotuzumab (BMS-901608; HuLuc63)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Linear Regression of Maximal Percent Reduction in Serum Monoclonal (M) Protein on Baseline Percent CD56^Dim Cells in Bone Marrow
Time Frame: From day of last patient, first dose to 6 months
Estimated using linear regression model, with baseline CD56^dim cells as the independent covariate, and maximal percent reduction in serum M protein as the dependent variable. For 1 patient who had nonmeasurable disease at baseline, the percent change in serum kappa-lambda difference was used instead of the percent change in serum M protein. Unit of measure=percent change from baseline in M protein cells/ percent change in CD56^dim cells (% chg from BL in M pro/% chg CD56^dim cs)
From day of last patient, first dose to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Who Died and With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, and Infusion Reactions
Time Frame: From day of last patient, first dose to 6 months
AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization.
From day of last patient, first dose to 6 months
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Meeting the Criteria for Grade 3-4 Abnormality
Time Frame: From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 60 days (assessed up to August 2017, approximately 59 months
Clinical laboratory evaluations included hematology, chemistry, and liver and renal functioning.
From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 60 days (assessed up to August 2017, approximately 59 months
Number of Participants With a Dose- or Concentration-related Effect on QTcF Interval, PR Interval, QRS Interval, and Heart Rate
Time Frame: cycle 1 to first day of cycle 3 assessed up to 08/17, approximately 59 months
All on-treatment electrocardiograms (ECGs) were performed in triplicates ( 1 ECG test equaled 3 consecutive individual 12-lead ECGs performed within a 4-minute period). The timing of the ECG was critical to the endpoint of the study. The investigative site documented any deviations from the protocol or procedures related to ECG collection or serum sampling. No ECGs were excluded due to timing deviations; no deviations were considered clinically relevant and all ECG data were included.
cycle 1 to first day of cycle 3 assessed up to 08/17, approximately 59 months
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate
Time Frame: Up to 2 years from the initiation of study therapy by dose cohort (approximately 24 months)
The probability was estimated from the K-M curve of subjects being alive and without disease progression (modified IMWG criteria) at 2 years from the initiation of study therapy by dose cohort
Up to 2 years from the initiation of study therapy by dose cohort (approximately 24 months)
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: From first dose to date of progression or objective response (assessed up to August 2017, approximately 59 months)
ORR is defined as the number of participants with stringent compete response [SCR], complete response [CR], very good partial response [VGPR], and partial response [PR])/number of participants in arm, expressed as a percentage. Confidence intervals computed using the Clopper and Pearson method. SCR=CR plus normal free light chain ratio and absence of clonal cells in bone marrow by immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence. CR=Negative immunofixation on serum and urine and 5% or fewer plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR=Serum and urine monoclonal (M) protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% reduction in serum M protein level plus urine M protein level <100 mg/24 hour. PR=50% reduction of serum M protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M protein by 90% or to <200 mg/24 hour
From first dose to date of progression or objective response (assessed up to August 2017, approximately 59 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Bristol-Myers Squibb

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
AbbVie

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 28, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 30, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 17, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 27, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 27, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 28, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 23, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 21, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CA204-011

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

Clinical Trials on Elotuzumab (BMS-901608; HuLuc63)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings