Comparative Effectiveness of Vitamin D and Repletion Strategies (CEDARS)

January 31, 2012 updated by: Bastyr University

A Comparative Effectiveness Trial of High-quality Vitamin D3 Nutritional Supplements to Replete Serum Vitamin D

The importance of vitamin D (VitD) in the prevention and treatment of human health conditions has gained increased attention in recent years. As a result, medical providers of all categories are screening clinical VitD status frequently, yet become challenged with how to best advise patients regarding repletion of VitD status, i.e. which form of VitD replacement is most effective. It has been recognized that to achieve significant effects - serum concentrations >30ng/ml (75 nmol/ml) - it is necessary, as well as safe, to recommend substantially higher doses than were previously thought sufficient. These higher doses can be easily achieved orally. This clinical trial aims to compare absorption of three available forms of this fat-soluble vitamin, due to the potential differences in absorption of different preparations. High-quality powdered, chewable and lipid-emulsified VitD are readily available as supplements, yet these have not been systematically compared. This three-arm, randomized clinical trial will compare the difference in serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (25-OH)D concentration between the three arms at baseline and after random administration of one of the three VitD preparations for 12-weeks at a dosage of 10,000 IU VitD per day. The investigators hypothesize that the three forms of vitD will result in an equivalent increase in serum 25OHD.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

VitD has numerous hormonal effects, including regulation of Ca2+ and Mg2+, as well as effects on numerous genes, including insulin and androgens. Mounting literature demonstrates associations between VitD insufficiency and cancer, diabetes and heart disease. VitD insufficiency, defined by concentration of serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (25-OHD) <33ng/ml (82.5 nmol/ml), is common at all latitudes; the prevalence is estimated at ~35% in "healthy" populations. VitD testing and replacement is gaining popularity in clinical practice. It is not known whether there is a difference in the effect of equivalent doses of emulsified vs. non-emulsified cholecalciferol (VitD3) supplementation, reflected by quantitative changes in serum 25-OHD. However, clinical observations revealed that in an average of 4.4 months, subjects taking 4000 iu daily of the emulsified form of cholecalciferol improved their 25-OHD levels by 6.76 ng/mL more than those taking 5,000 iu daily of the non-emulsified form. The safety of taking 10,000 IU/day has been confirmed. Taking this dose for 12 weeks should cause a robust increase in serum 25-OHD. This study will provide preliminary data comparing three high quality VitD3 supplements, one a powdered capsule, one a chewable tablet, and the other a lipid-emulsified liquid. Future studies will compare the "better" supplement to conventional VitD replacement using VitD2.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
66

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Hawaii
      • Kailua Kona, Hawaii, United States, 96740
        • Lokahi Health Center
    • Washington
      • Kenmore, Washington, United States, 98028
        • Bastyr University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Provision of informed consent
  • Between18-65 years of age; there is an age-related decline in the absorption, transport or liver hydroxylation of orally-consumed VitD (Harris, 1999) therefore adults older than 65 will be excluded. This population is also at greater risk of being on medications with potential medication interactions, e.g. anticoagulants.
  • Willingness to perform baseline screening tests: serum 25-OHD, CBC, Comprehensive metabolic chemistry panel (electrolytes, hepatic and renal function tests, lipids, HgA1C, insulin and glucose)
  • Screening serum 25-OHD <33ng/ml (82.5 nmol/ml). If >=33ng/ml (82.5 nmol/ml), subjects will participate in the research study as baseline controls for the nested studies of Klotho and TLR-4.
  • Ability to read and speak English
  • Willingness to be randomized to one of three active treatments for 3 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who have a serum baseline 25-OHD >=33ng/ml (82.5 nmol/ml) will be excluded once the VitD sufficient baseline control recruitment goal is met
  • Subjects who have historical or current use of extra-dietary VitD, other than what is in a multivitamin, for the previous 3 months.
  • LFTs: AST>60 U/L; ALT>65 U/L; Alkaline phosphatase >120 U/L. Total bilirubin>1.5 mg/dL
  • Serum creatinine>1.4 mg/dL; BUN >25 mg/dL5. Subjects who are pregnant, or could become pregnant, unless they are using regular birth control (OCPs, condoms, IUD).
  • Subjects who have established osteoporosis.
  • Subjects who have history or symptoms of a parathyroid disorder.
  • Subjects who have difficulty swallowing pills.
  • Subjects who are unwilling to use sunscreen.
  • Subjects who have had a past adverse reaction to sunscreen.
  • Subjects who are taking medications over the previous 3 months that interfere with the metabolism of VitD (anti-convulsants, anti-coagulants, oral corticosteroids, or barbiturates).
  • Subjects with any psychological conditions or substance abuse that may make the subject non- adherent, such as history of bipolar disorder, mania, untreated anxiety or other mood disorder, as determined by the site PI.
  • Other severe illness or mental incapacity that, in the opinion of the site PI, would render the potential subject incapable of participating in the study.
  • Allergy to sesame oil base
  • Heart arrhythmia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Powder D3 Capsule - 2,000 IU per Cap
Vital Nutrients
Dietary supplement: Vitamin D3
10,000 IU per Day for 12 Weeks
Other Names:
  • Calcitriol
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Chewable D3 Tablet - 2,000 IU per Tab
Integrative Therapeutics Inc.
Dietary supplement: Vitamin D3
10,000 IU per Day for 12 Weeks
Other Names:
  • Calcitriol
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Liquid D3 Drop - 2,000 IU per Drop
Biotics Research
Dietary supplement: Vitamin D3
10,000 IU per Day for 12 Weeks
Other Names:
  • Calcitriol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in mean serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol concentration
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
To compare the change in serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (25-OHD) concentration between three forms of supplemental vitamin D3: a lipid-emulsified form administered in a sesame oil base, a non-emulsified chewable tablet, and a non-emulsified form administered as a capsule, following 12 weeks of supplementation (10,000 IU/day) in D3 insufficient patients (baseline 25-OHD <33ng/ml (82.5 nmol/ml)) patients.
Baseline and 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of participants reaching 25-hydroxycholecalciferol concentration >=33ng/ml (82.5 nmol/ml) between groups
Time Frame: 12 weeks
To compare the proportion of participants reaching a laboratory "normal" 25-hydroxycholecalciferol concentration >=33ng/ml (82.5 nmol/ml) between D3 supplement groups following 12-weeks of D3 supplementation at 10,000 IU.day
12 weeks
Change in mean Klotho protein concentration
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
To explore the expression of Klotho protein, and analytes associated with VitD homeostasis, comparing VitD sufficient, i.e. 25-OHD >=33ng/ml (82.5 nmol/ml), patients to those who are VitD insufficient, i.e. 25-OHD <33ng/ml, at baseline screenings, and to compare Klotho protein expression in VitD insufficient participants before and after D3 supplementation (10,000 IU/day), stratified by supplement group assignment.
Baseline and 12 weeks
Change in Toll-like receptor concentration in monocytes
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
To explore the change in IFN-gamma induced TLR-4 expression in human monocytes (ex-vivo), comparing VitD sufficient, i.e. 25-OHD >=33ng/ml (82.5 nmol/ml), patients to those who are VitD insufficient, i.e. 25-OHD <33ng/ml, at baseline screenings, and to compare the change in IFN-gamma induced TLR-4 expression in human monocytes (ex-vivo) between VitD groups, following 12 weeks of supplementation with one of three forms of VitD3: lipid-emulsified, non-emulsified chewable tablet, and a non-emulsified encapsulated form.
Baseline and 12 weeks
Change in mean cardiometabolic risk factors
Time Frame: Baseline- 12 weeks
To explore change in mean fasting glucose, hemoglobin A1c, total cholesterol, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, LDL, HDL-C, and triglycerides will be reported following 12-weeks of D3 supplementation (10,000 IU/day) in healthy humans
Baseline- 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Bastyr University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Diabetes Action Research and Education Foundation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2011

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 8, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 31, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 2, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 2, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 31, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • H30-B11

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings