Clinical Usefulness and Quality of Life of OROS Hydromorphone in Patients Who Have Not Been Treated With a Strong Opioid

March 15, 2014 updated by: Janssen Korea, Ltd., Korea

Clinical Usefulness and Quality of Life of OROS Hydromorphone in Strong Opioid-Naïve Cancer Pain Patients; Multicenter, Prospective, Open-Label and Observational Study

The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of hydromorphone to treat cancer pain in patients who have not been treated with a strong opioid.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a multicenter, prospective, open-label (all people know the identity of the intervention) and observational study. Patients selected for the proposed study are patients complaining of cancer pain who visit or are hospitalized at the research centers during the study, who are not being treated with strong continuous opioid (narcotic medication used against the pain), and who require cancer pain control with hydromorphone, at the investigator's discretion. The study will evaluate the changes in pain relief, level of sleep deprivation, and the patients' quality of life before and after administration of hydromorphone.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
400

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
      • Ansan, Korea, Republic of
      • Busan, Korea, Republic of
      • Cheongju, Korea, Republic of
      • Daegu, Korea, Republic of
      • Hwasun Gun, Korea, Republic of
      • Incheon, Korea, Republic of
      • Pusan, Korea, Republic of
      • Seognam-Si, Kyungki-Do, Korea, Republic of
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
      • Suwon, Korea, Republic of
      • Wonju-Shi, Korea, Republic of

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Korean cancer patients having cancer pain who visit or are hospitalized at the research centers during the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria: - Patients who complain of cancer pain and who require administration of hydromorphone HCl - Patients who can follow the requirements of the overall study, including completion of filling out the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, at the investigator's discretion - Signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: - Patients who received strong continuous narcotic analgesics (eg morphine, fentanyl, oxycodone, hydromorphone) within 4 weeks prior to administration of the study drug - Patients who have a medical history of receiving drugs in the past or currently, or of drug abuse - Patients who did not agree to conduct the approved methods for contraception during the study - Patients who have sustained injuries in physical functions or diseases which may cause abnormalities in absorbing the study drug, excessive accumulation and metabolic or elimination disorder - Patients who are receiving Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors (MAO) inhibitors or who are within 2 weeks from discontinuation - Patients who need to be excluded based on precautions in the user manual of the study drug, notice and contradictions, at the investigator's discretion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Hydromorphone HCI OROS
Drug: Hydromorphone HCI OROS
type= exact number, unit= mg, number=4, form= tablet, route= oral use. One tablet administered once a day. The dose may be increased if the level of pain increases or if the pain-killing effect is insufficient.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The ratio of patients with % PID (Pain Intensity Difference) over 30% of patients from the first evaluation date until the third evaluation date, following the administration of hydromorphone HCI to cancer pain patients
Time Frame: Baseline and at approximately Day 57
Baseline and at approximately Day 57

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in the Karnofsky Performance Rating Scale (KPRS)
Time Frame: Baseline, and at approximately Days 29 and 57
The KPRS measures the physical functions of cancer patients, and indicates the feasibility of daily life by 10% units from 0% (death) to 100% (normal status in which patients can do activities to the level before disease without limitations).
Baseline, and at approximately Days 29 and 57
Change in pain relief (%)
Time Frame: Baseline, and at approximately Days 29 and 57
How much pain was relieved by the pain therapy or medication for the last 24 hours, using %: 0%= nothing reduced and 100%= completely reduced.
Baseline, and at approximately Days 29 and 57
Frequency of awakening
Time Frame: Baseline, and at approximately Days 29 and 57
Check whether patients experienced awakening during sleep caused by pain for the last 1 week or not, and measure the frequency (1 = once, 2 = twice, 3 = 3 times, 4 = more than 4 times, 5 = not woken, 6 = never slept).
Baseline, and at approximately Days 29 and 57
Level of sleep inconvenience
Time Frame: Baseline, and at approximately Days 29 and 57
Measure the level of sleep inconvenience that patients experienced due to pain for the last 1 week using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS); 0 = not causing inconvenience, 10 = completely causing inconvenience.
Baseline, and at approximately Days 29 and 57
Satisfaction with sleep
Time Frame: Baseline, and at approximately Days 29 and 57
Indicate the overall satisfaction with sleep by improving sleep disturbance caused by pain for the last 1 week using the Numeric Rating Scale (0 "never satisfied" on the left end; 10 "very satisfied" on the right end).
Baseline, and at approximately Days 29 and 57
Quality of life assessment measured by the EORTC QLQ-C15 PAL
Time Frame: Baseline, and at approximately Days 29 and 57
The EORTC (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer) QLQ-C15 (Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15) is a commonly used questionnaire to assess the quality of life of cancer patients taking paliative medicine. This questionnaire consists of questions measuring physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functions, and answers are given based on a 4-point scale, from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so).
Baseline, and at approximately Days 29 and 57
Investigator's Global Assessment
Time Frame: At approximately Days 29 and 57
The investigator's global assessment is used to assess how effective the study drug was for the patients after administration of the study drug since the last evaluation date. It is measured by the investigator from the investigator's point of view as 1 = not effective, 2 = normal l, 3 = effective, 4 very effective, and 5 = extremely effective.
At approximately Days 29 and 57
Patient's Global Assessment
Time Frame: At approximately Days 29 and 57
The patient's global assessment is used to assess how effective the study drug was for the patients after administration of the study drug since the last evaluation date. It is measured by the patient from the patient's point of view as 1 = not effective, 2 = normal, 3 = effective, 4 = very effective, and 5 = extremely effective.
At approximately Days 29 and 57
CGI-I (Clinical Global Impression - Improvement)
Time Frame: At approximately Days 29 and 57
Evaluate how much patients have improved compared with the conditions of patients at baseline, from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (greatly deteriorated).
At approximately Days 29 and 57

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Janssen Korea, Ltd., Korea

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 10, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 14, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 15, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 18, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 15, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CR100741
  • 42801PAI4013 (OTHER: Janssen Korea, Ltd., Korea)
  • HYD-KOR-5011 (OTHER: Janssen Korea, Ltd., Korea)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings