Efficacy of Patient Controlled Epidural Anesthesia Versus Continuous Epidural Analgesia for Post-thoracotomy Pain

June 9, 2016 updated by: Dr. Vidur Shyam, Queen's University

Efficacy of Patient Controlled Epidural Anesthesia (PCEA) Versus Continuous Epidural Analgesia (CEA) for Post-thoracotomy Pain.

Postoperative thoracotomy pain is normally managed with an epidural catheter and continuous epidural analgesia (CEA). However, for some surgical procedures, patient controlled epidural anesthesia (PCEA) is more effective but little research has compared the two methods following thoracotomy. The current randomized, prospective clinical investigation did just this. Following institutional ethics approval 52 patients scheduled for thoracotomy were recruited for this prospective, randomized, unblinded study. A thoracic epidural catheter was sited preoperatively. Postoperatively all patients were titrated on continuous epidural infusions (hydromorphone 10 mcg/mL + bupivacaine 1 mg/mL) until pain scores were stable at ≤3 on a numeric rating scale (NRS). Then they were allocated to their preoperatively determined randomization (either remained on continuous epidural infusion or they were switched to receive 2/3 of the stabilized background dose via continuous epidural infusion with the option to self-administer the remaining 1/3rd of the dose via PCEA. Participants remained on their allocated analgesic regimens for 48 hours postoperatively. The primary outcome was consumption of local anaesthetics/opioids. The secondary outcomes were worst pain and pain while coughing (0-10 NRS).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
52

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 2V7
        • Kingston General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-75 years of age
  • American Society of Anesthesiologist's (ASA) Physical Status I-III
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) < 40
  • Able to use a PCEA device

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intolerance/hypersensitivity to agents used in the study
  • Contraindication to epidural placement
  • Current alcohol/substance abuse
  • Chronic pain condition requiring chronic analgesic
  • BMI ≥ 40 or body weight less than 50kg.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Patient controlled epidural analgesia
An epidural catheter sited preoperatively so analgesics can be administered postoperatively. Patients were titrated on a continuous analgesic epidural infusion until stable pain scores of ≤ 3 were reached while in PACU. Once stable, they were allocated to their preoperatively determined randomization which meant they still received 2/3rd of the anesthetic as a background infusion but also had the option to self-administer the remaining 1/3rd dose as patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). Rescue analgesia was available upon request.
Procedure: Patient controlled epidural analgesia
Continuous epidural infusion rates were set to maintain pain scores of ≤ 3 on a numeric rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10 while in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) following thoracotomy. Once stabilized patients were switched to Patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) which meant they continued to receive 2/3rds of the dose as continuous background epidural infusions but they had the option to receive the remaining 1/3rd dosage via PCEA.
Other Names:
  • PCEA
Active Comparator: continuous epidural analgesia
An epidural catheter sited preoperatively so analgesics can be administered postoperatively. Patients were titrated on a continuous analgesic epidural infusion rate until stable pain scores of ≤ 3 were reached while in PACU (as described in the PCEA group). Once stable, they were allocated to their preoperatively determined randomization assignment which for the CEA group meant they remained on the continuous background epidural infusion rate previously determined to maintain pain scores ≤ 3 while in PACU. Rescue analgesia was available as needed.
Procedure: Continuous epidural analgesia
The continuous epidural analgesia (CEA) infusion rates were titrated to achieve pain scores of ≤ 3 on a numeric rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10 while in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (as described for the PCEA group above). Those allocated to the CEA group remained on the same continuous epidural analgesia infusion which maintained the pain scores at ≤ 3.
Other Names:
  • CEA

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Local Anesthetic Consumption
Time Frame: 48 hours postoperatively
Amount of anesthetic consumed (either through epidural catheter or as rescue bolus at 48 hours following thoracotomy administered either through CEA or PCEA.
48 hours postoperatively
Anesthetic Consumption (mg)
Time Frame: 4,8,12, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively
amount of anesthetic consumed was calculated for each group over time.
4,8,12, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Worst Pain Scores
Time Frame: 48 hours postoperatively
worst pain scores on numerical rating scale (0-10, where 10 is the worst) at 24 & 48 hours following surgery
48 hours postoperatively
Worst Pain While Coughing
Time Frame: 48 hours postoperatively
Worst pain on a numerical rating scale(0-10 worst) at 24 and 48 hours following thoracotomy
48 hours postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Queen's University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Vidur Shyam, MBBS, FRCPC, Queen's University & Kingston General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 6, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 21, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 22, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 21, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 9, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ANAE-147-08 (Other Identifier: Queens University REB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings