Safety Study of Levocetirizine and Fexofenadine (LAWAF)

September 15, 2019 updated by: Martin Metz, Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Comparison of Efficacy and Consistency of Action of Levocetirizine 5 mg Once Daily With Fexofenadine 60 mg Twice Daily in the Histamine Induced Wheal, Flare and Itch Response

This Study is to comparison of Efficacy and Consistency of Action of Levocetirizine 5 mg once daily with Fexofenadine 60 mg twice daily in the histamine induced wheal, flare and itch Response.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This will be a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with intra-individual comparison of the histamine induced wheal and flare reaction. In September 2009, Fexofenadine was approved as an antihistamine against allergies in Japan and it is currently used widely. It has been approved in 120 countries, including the US, UK, France and Germany [11]. In Europe and the United States, fexofenadine is marketed at 120 mg once daily for allergic rhinitis and 180mg once daily for urticaria. In Japan, fexofenadine is marketed at 60 mg twice daily for both conditions. But is this dosage regimen as effective as levocetirizine, 5 mg once daily? The above described study from Takahashi et al, comparing 60 mg twice daily versus cetirizine 10 mg once daily suggests that it is not [4]. The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy and consistency of action of levocetirizine 5 mg once daily with fexofenadine 60 mg twice daily over a 24 hour period in the histamine induced wheal, flare and itch response. Furthermore, we would like to investigate whether a different between Japanese and Caucasian exists or not. Each volunteer will receive the study medication at time point 0 and 12 hour later. Skin Prick Test (SPT) will be performed in each volunteer using histamine (10 mg/ml), 15 minutes before drug admission (baseline) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hours afterwards. Volumetric optical scanning system and infrared camera will be used for objective evaluation of the wheal- and flare reduction. Additionally, measurement of the erythema diameter with a transparent ruler will be performed. The subjective intensity of itching will be assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). To relate the pharmacokinetics of the drugs to their pharmacodynamics, blood samples for assay of drug concentrations will be taken at baseline and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hours later. Subjects will undergo the same procedure on three separate occasions to receive each treatment option. The options are: placebo at time 0 hours + placebo at 12 hours, Levocetirizine 5mg at time 0 hours + placebo at 12 hours or fexofenadine 60mg at time 0 hours + fexofenadine 60mg at 12 hours. There will be a washout period of at least 6 days between the treatments.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
18

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • University of Berlin Charité, Department of Dermatology and Allergy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Eighteen (18) healthy male volunteers, including at least 6 persons of Japanese origin, will be recruited for this study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None of the subjects will have taken oral antihistamines, antidepressants, antipsychotics or corticosteroids or applied topical antihistamines, corticosteroids or mast cell stabilizers to the skin for 2 weeks prior to testing.
  • No subject shall perform physical exercise for 4 hours prior to the skin prick testing.
  • Especially, Bronchial asthma, anaphylactic reactions in the history, use of beta-blockers, skin diseases in the test field are exclusion criteria.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo per os at time 0 hours + placebo per os at 12 hours.
Drug: Placebo Oral Tablet
Other Names:
  • Lichtenstein
Active Comparator: Levocetirizin
Levocetirizin 5mg at time 0 and placebo per os at 12 hours
Drug: Placebo Oral Tablet
Other Names:
  • Lichtenstein
Drug: Levocetirizine Oral Tablet
Active Comparator: Fexofenadine
Fexofenadine 60mg per os at time 0 hours + fexofenadine 60mg per os at 12 hours
Drug: Fexofenadine 60 Mg Oral Tablet
Other Names:
  • Telfast

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pruritus as Assessed by the VAS Score
Time Frame: up to 10 minutes after skin prick test performed 24 hours after drug administration
We measured drug concentrations and various aspects of skin provocation testing such as itch intensity and wheal size. Measurements made at each time point were as followed: Pruritus was assessed every 30 s for 10 min after SPT using a visual analogue scale (VAS) score with a "0" and "100" at the two ex- tremes of an unmarked 100 mm line with higher values indicating greater puritus. The mean VAS for each 10 min was calculated and used as a primary end Point.
up to 10 minutes after skin prick test performed 24 hours after drug administration
Flaire Diameter (mm)
Time Frame: 24 hours per treatment
Flaire diameter was measured with a transparent ruler as the mean of the largest diameter and the diameter at right angles to this.
24 hours per treatment
Wheal Volume (cm3)
Time Frame: 24 hours per treatment
Wheal volume was measured by a non-contact three dimensional measurement system (PRIMOS contact, GFM Messtechnik GmbH, Teltow, Germany).
24 hours per treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Marcus Maurer, MD, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 23, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 24, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 26, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 15, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2010-022747-38

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be available.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings