Comparison Between Infant Flow SiPAP and Noninvasive NAVA in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

May 25, 2015 updated by: Ravinder Kajla, Fraser Health

A Pilot Study Comparing Infant Flow SiPAP to Noninvasive NAVA

When babies are born premature, they often need help with their breathing. The equipment used to help them breathe is not very comfortable and they sometimes need to be put on a specialized breathing machine with a tube into their lungs. The breathing machine or ventilator can be damaging to the newborn's lungs and more damage can occur the longer the newborn stays on a ventilator leading to chronic lung disease later in their lives. A new device called neurally adjusted ventilatory assist or NAVA is available that the investigators believe may be more comfortable for the premature newborn and may help the baby come off breathing support sooner. When using this device, babies may not need to be put on a ventilator and can avoid the lung damage associated with the breathing tube and the ventilator. The objective of this pilot study is to compare this new breathing device called NAVA, to the equipment that is currently being used, called SiPAP, to support premature newborn's breathing after birth without a breathing tube. The investigators hope to show that with this new technology, premature newborns that are having a difficult time breathing, will come off breathing support sooner compared to the breathing machines that are currently being used. The hypothesis for this proposed study is that improved synchrony with noninvasive NAVA will decrease time spent on noninvasive ventilation and avoid intubation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
21

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • British Columbia
      • Surrey, British Columbia, Canada, V3V 1Z2
        • Surrey Memorial Hospital
      • Surrey, British Columbia, Canada, V3V1Z2
        • Surrey Memorial Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 7 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Infants born greater than or equal to 28+0 weeks and less than or equal to 31+6 weeks gestation
  • Diagnosis of RDS in the first 24 hours of life requiring respiratory support
  • Parental consent obtained

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants with a major congenital anomaly
  • Infants with pulmonary hypoplasia
  • Infants known or suspected to have a neuromuscular disorder
  • Infants less than 28+0 weeks GA
  • Intubated infants that are likely to require continued mechanical ventilation
  • Infants requiring vigorous resuscitation at birth, including chest compressions +/- cardiac medications

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: SiPAP
Device: SiPAP - placebo
The Infant Flow® SiPAP provides noninvasive support to neonates. CPAP and Biphasic modes are provided by the Infant Flow® SiPAP. CPAP is an elevated pressure (above atmospheric) and is used to increase a premature babies functional residual capacity (FRC). CPAP is a modality used for babies with both central apneas and mild/moderate increase work of breathing. CPAP increases the FRC and ultimately recruits collapsed alveoli and improves gas exchange in the lungs. BiPhasic, on the other hand, is a modality used for babies that require more respiratory support than CPAP can provide. In BiPhasic mode, respiratory rate (RR), inspiratory time (Ti), and peak inspiratory pressures (PIP) are set and not synchronized with the patients breathing efforts.
Experimental: Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist
Device: Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA)
Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA), an adjunct that can only be used with the Servo-i ventilator, allows the patient to synchronize spontaneous respiratory effort with mechanical ventilation. NAVA uses the electromyographic signal of the diaphragm (Edi) to transmit this electrical activity back to the ventilator. The NAVA catheter is a functional gastric tube that has electrodes embedded within it and positioned at the level of diaphragm using an electrocardiogram signal. These electrodes continuously (every 5ms) detect the amplitude, duration, and frequency of the Edi and provide pressure support in proportion to this electrical activity. Proportionality is controlled by a NAVA factor (cmH20/microvolt) and is adjusted by the user.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
total duration of respiratory support which includes both days and hours on NAVA/SiPAP (DORS)
Time Frame: one year
one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Proportion of infants that required escalation to increased noninvasive respiratory support (BiPhasic or increasing NAVA levels) or intubation and mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: one year
one year
All cause mortality during the hospitalization
Time Frame: one year
one year
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia defined as oxygen requirements or ventilatory support needs at 36 weeks CGA
Time Frame: one year
one year
Number of doses of surfactant
Time Frame: one year
one year
Incidence of pneumothorax
Time Frame: one year
one year
Total duration of oxygen requirement
Time Frame: one year
one year
Incidence of nasal deformities, specifically nasal erosions
Time Frame: one year
one year
Time to reach full volume feeds (at least 120 ml/kg/day)
Time Frame: one year
one year
Time to regain birth weight
Time Frame: one year
one year
Total length of hospital stay
Time Frame: one year
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Fraser Health

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ravinder Kajla, Fraser Health
  • Study Chair: Rebecca Sherlock, MD, Fraser Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 26, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 27, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 30, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 27, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 25, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NAVA

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings