Short and Long Term Treatment With 4-AP in Ambulatory SMA Patients

August 6, 2024 updated by: Claudia Chiriboga, Columbia University

Columbia SMA Project: 4-AP as a Potential SMA Therapeutic Agent and Biological Mechanisms of Action

The purpose of this study is to assess whether 4-AP (Dalfampridine-ER, Ampyra) improves walking ability and endurance in adult patients with Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) Type 3 compared to placebo and whether the duration of treatment affects outcome.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a genetically determined neuromuscular disorder that results in muscle weakness and impaired functional mobility. Fatigue is a common symptom in SMA with a resultant impact on physical function and quality of life however the precise mechanisms are unknown. At present there is no treatment for SMA. There is evidence that 4-AP improves function in SMA animal models. In patients with multiple sclerosis, 4-AP was found to improve walking ability and diminish fatigue. The purpose of the study is to determine whether treatment with 4-AP is associated with an increase in walking speed and endurance compared to placebo and whether the duration of treatment affects outcome. The study comprises a short term treatment trial in which participants are treated for 2 weeks with 4-AP and placebo in random sequence followed by a long treatment trial of 6 weeks in which patients are also treated with placebo and 4 AP. The primary outcome measure of the clinical study will be the six minute walk test (6MWT), which has been documented to be a valid and sensitive instrument to identify fatigue among ambulatory SMA patients. We will also assess the effect of 4-AP on muscle and nerve electrical function via electromyography (EMG) during the short term trial. Results of this study may provide support for larger clinical trials.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
11

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged 18 to 50 years at the time of enrollment
  2. Have genetically confirmed SMA 3 (homozygous absence of SMN1 exon 7)
  3. Ability to walk at least 25 meters without assistance
  4. Be free of major orthopedic deformities (i.e. scoliosis, contractures)
  5. Normal Cystatin C clearance (> 80 ml/min)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with a history of seizures
  2. Patients with any renal impairment
  3. Inability to comply with the study procedures
  4. Unstable medical illness
  5. Any ventilatory assistance
  6. Taking experimental medication for SMA other than under this protocol
  7. Pregnancy or lactation
  8. Menstruating women, not sterilized or not using effective birth control
  9. Planning to undergo scoliosis surgery within the next 10 months
  10. Inability to give informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: 4-aminopyridine (Ampyra)
10 mg tab/ 1 tab twice daily
Drug: 4-aminopyridine
10 mg/twice daily
Other Names:
  • Ampyra
  • dalfampridine-ER
Placebo Comparator: Sugar pill
Placebo 1 tab /twice daily
Drug: Placebo
Crossover study involving one trial with sugar pill (placebo)
Other Names:
  • Sugar pill

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) With Kinematic Evaluation of Gait (Short Term)
Time Frame: Day 14 of each short-term intervention period
The primary outcome measure will be distance walked in the 6MWT. This measure is an objective evaluation of functional capacity which measures the distance a person can walk quickly in six minutes and is most representative of a person's ability because the test intensity is self-selected. The 6MWT can be safely performed in ambulatory SMA patients and correlates with standard SMA outcome measures including timed walking tests. In SMA, the 6MWT may be more sensitive to clinically meaningful changes in patients with type 3 SMA as it is a direct measure of their functional mobility.
Day 14 of each short-term intervention period
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) With Kinematic Evaluation of Gait (Long Term)
Time Frame: Day 42 of each long-term intervention period
The primary outcome measure will be distance walked in the 6MWT. This measure is an objective evaluation of functional capacity which measures the distance a person can walk quickly in six minutes and is most representative of a person's ability because the test intensity is self-selected. The 6MWT can be safely performed in ambulatory SMA patients and correlates with standard SMA outcome measures including timed walking tests. In SMA, the 6MWT may be more sensitive to clinically meaningful changes in patients with type 3 SMA as it is a direct measure of their functional mobility.
Day 42 of each long-term intervention period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale, Expanded (HFMSE) (Short Term)
Time Frame: Day 14 of each short-term intervention period
Assessments of motor function are clinically relevant and are a good adjunct to tests of walking ability. The HFMSE, a 33-item scale designed for SMA type 2 and 3 patients, and is associated with minimal patient burden requiring only standard equipment and is completed on average in less than 15 minutes. The HFMSE showed good test-retest reliability and is correlated with other clinical and physiological measures in SMA. The score range is 0 (all items failed) to 66 (all items achieved unaided), with higher score indicating higher level of motor function.
Day 14 of each short-term intervention period
Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale, Expanded (HFMSE) (Long Term)
Time Frame: Day 42 of each long-term intervention period
Assessments of motor function are clinically relevant and are a good adjunct to tests of walking ability. The HFMSE, a 33-item scale designed for SMA type 2 and 3 patients, and is associated with minimal patient burden requiring only standard equipment and is completed on average in less than 15 minutes. The HFMSE showed good test-retest reliability and is correlated with other clinical and physiological measures in SMA. The score range is 0 (all items failed) to 66 (all items achieved unaided), with higher score indicating higher level of motor function.
Day 42 of each long-term intervention period
Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) Total Score (Short Term)
Time Frame: Day 14 of each short-term intervention period
MMT will involve pushing and pulling against the evaluators hand (MMT). The purpose of this test is to measure the strength in different muscles. MMT was performed on 28 muscle groups (8 muscle groups on each leg and 6 muscle groups on each arm), including proximal and distal musculature. The score range for each muscle group is 0 to 10, with a higher score indicating better muscle strength. The total score range is 0 to 280.
Day 14 of each short-term intervention period
Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) Total Score (Long Term)
Time Frame: Day 42 of each long-term intervention period
MMT will involve pushing and pulling against the evaluators hand (MMT). The purpose of this test is to measure the strength in different muscles. MMT was performed on 28 muscle groups (8 muscle groups on each leg and 6 muscle groups on each arm), including proximal and distal musculature. The score range for each muscle group is 0 to 10, with a higher score indicating better muscle strength. The total score range is 0 to 280.
Day 42 of each long-term intervention period
Motor Unit Number Estimation (MUNE)
Time Frame: Day 14 of each short-term intervention period
Motor Unit Number Estimation (MUNE) is a noninvasive test that identifies the number of motor units (motor nerve cells and the territory of muscle fibers they control) using electrical muscle stimulation and recording the response. The nerve conduction study involves the administration of modest electrical stimulations (pulsations or throbbing sensations from low level electricity) to a total of 4 nerves in the right arm and leg while recording the response over a muscle innervated by each nerve. MUNE is calculated by determining the compound motor action potential (CMAP) amplitude or area under the curve of a distal muscle in response to supramaximal stimulation, and then dividing the result by the amplitude or area under the curve of a single motor unit action potential.
Day 14 of each short-term intervention period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Columbia University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
United States Department of Defense

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Claudia A. Chiriboga, MD, MPH, Columbia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 5, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 19, 2012

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 20, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 6, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AAAI7400

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Clinical Trials on 4-aminopyridine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings