Comparison of Acetaminophen and PRP Therapy for Knee OA

October 19, 2015 updated by: Mario Alberto Simental Mendia, M Sc, Principal Investigator, Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose E. Gonzalez

Comparison of Acetaminophen and Platelet-rich Plasma Therapy for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis.

The purpose of this study is to test whether the platelet-rich plasma (PRP) intra-articular injection therapy is effective as an alternative treatment option in patients with mild knee osteoarthritis within a controlled randomized study compared to first line treatment acetaminophen. The investigators will evaluate patients outcome in level of pain, knee function and quality of life before the treatment and at 6, 12 and 24 weeks follow up.

The study will be complemented with in vitro experiments of human osteoarthritic cartilage explants culture (treated with PRP) for histological and gene expression assays.

PRP intra-articular injections therapy is effective in patients with mild knee osteoarthritis by modifying the biochemical joint environment and cartilage regeneration capability.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a randomized controled study. Patients enroled in the study will be divided into two groups (calculated n=30 per group). One group will be treated with acetaminophen (500 mg/8 h) for 6 weeks, the experimental group will receive a total of 3 intra-articular injections of PRP, one injection every 2 weeks. The intake of any other analgesic or anti-inflammatory drug will be prohibited in patients from two groups.

For those who received the infiltrations, the procedure consist of a 27-mL venous blood sample in 6 vacutainer tubes with sodium citrate 0.109 M for each injection. Samples are gently agitated to ensure mixing the anticoagulant with the blood. An extra tube with anticoagulated EDTA blood is obtained for initial platelet count. Blood samples are centrifuged for 10 minutes at 1800 rpm to separate the erythrocyte layer. The upper plasma layer is carefully collected in a new sterile propylene tube trying not to remove the leukocyte layer. Plasma from all tubes is centrifuged again for 12 minutes at 3400 rpm to obtain a two-part plasma: the upper part consisting on platelet-poor plasma and lower part consisting of platelet-rich plasma (PRP). The platelet-poor plasma is discarded to obtain a final volume of 3 mL. This volume, consisting of PRP, is mixed carefully through pipetting to resuspend platelets and it was then transferred to a new sterile glass tube. An aliquot of the final PRP is sent to the laboratory for platelet count. All open handling sample procedures are performed within a high-efficiency particulate air-filtered laminar flow hood.

Application of injections is carry out after disinfection of skin in the knee joint area. After local anesthesia with lidocaine chlorohydrate, platelets are activated using 10% calcium gluconate solution and the liquid PRP is injected in a sterile condition using a 22 G needle. The needle is inserted using the superolateral approach in an angle of approximately 45°.

Patients from PRP group will be asked to flex and extend their knees immediately after injection so that PRP could distribute adequately across the joint space. After 5-10 minutes of observation the patients are sent home with written indications including to have relative rest 24 to 48 hours after the injection, the use of cold therapy for 15 minutes three times a day and 500 mg of acetaminophen in case of pain and inflammation.

The use of NSAIDs or any steroids is prohibited. All the patients will be evaluated before the beginning of their respective treatment and at 6, 12 and 24 weeks after. Three different scales are used to evaluate clinical outcome, the VAS (Visual Analog Scale) that scores pain level, the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) which assesses pain, articular stiffness and functional limitation, and the Spanish (México) version of the SF-12 (Short Form-12) for assessment of quality of life.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
543

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Mexico
    • Nuevo León
      • Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico, 64460
        • Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose E. Gonzalez

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Older than 18 years old
  • Patients who haven't received steroids injection or medical treatment 1 month before the study
  • Patients with knee osteoarthritis grade I and II (Kellgren-Lawrence scale)
  • Indistinct gender
  • Patients who accept to participate in the study with previous signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with knee osteoarthritis grade III and IV (Kellgren-Lawrence scale)
  • Patients with prosthesis
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients with rheumatic diseases
  • Patients with diabetes, hepatic diseases, coagulopathy, cardiovascular diseases, immunosuppression, infections
  • Patients taking anticoagulants
  • Patients with concentrations of hemoglobin under 11 g/dL and platelets under 150,000/uL

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Acetaminophen
Patients from this arm will receive a dosis of acetaminophen (500 mg/8 hours) while PRP treatment lasts.
Drug: Acetaminophen
Patients from this arm will receive a dosis of acetaminophen (500 mg/8 hours) while PRP treatment lasts (6 weeks total).
EXPERIMENTAL: Intra-articular injection of PRP
Patients from this arm will receive 3 intra-articular knee injections of autologous platelet-rich plasma, one injection every two weeks
Procedure: Intra-articular injection of PRP
Patients from this arm will receive 3 intra-articular knee injections of autologous platelet-rich plasma, one injection every two weeks (6 weeks total).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)
Time Frame: 0 weeks
The WOMAC evaluation will be performed on patients who received the treatment at 0, 6, 12, 24 weeks after treatment is finished. The WOMAC measures five items for pain (score range 0-20), two for stiffness (score range 0-8), and 17 for functional limitation (score range 0-68). A total WOMAC score is created by summing the items for all three subscales (score range 0-96). Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.
0 weeks
Change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The WOMAC evaluation will be performed on patients who received the treatment at 0, 6, 12, 24 weeks after treatment is finished. The WOMAC measures five items for pain (score range 0-20), two for stiffness (score range 0-8), and 17 for functional limitation (score range 0-68). A total WOMAC score is created by summing the items for all three subscales (score range 0-96). Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.
6 weeks
Change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The WOMAC evaluation will be performed on patients who received the treatment at 0, 6, 12, 24 weeks after treatment is finished. The WOMAC measures five items for pain (score range 0-20), two for stiffness (score range 0-8), and 17 for functional limitation (score range 0-68). A total WOMAC score is created by summing the items for all three subscales (score range 0-96). Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.
12 weeks
Change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)
Time Frame: 24 weeks
The WOMAC evaluation will be performed on patients who received the treatment at 0, 6, 12, 24 weeks after treatment is finished. The WOMAC measures five items for pain (score range 0-20), two for stiffness (score range 0-8), and 17 for functional limitation (score range 0-68). A total WOMAC score is created by summing the items for all three subscales (score range 0-96). Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 0-24 weeks
The visual analog scale (VAS) is a psychometric response scale which measures subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. When responding to a VAS item, respondents specify their current level of pain by indicating a position along a continuous line of 10 cm. Subject is asked: on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable, what you rate your current pain?
0-24 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in SF-12v2 Health Survey
Time Frame: 0 weeks
The Spanish (Mexico) version of the SF-12v2 Health Survey uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. All 12 items from the survey can be summarized in two main domains (physical and mental health). Physical and Mental Health Composite Scores (PCS and MCS) are computed using the scores of 12 questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
0 weeks
Change in SF-12v2 Health Survey
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Spanish (Mexico) version of the SF-12v2 Health Survey uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. All 12 items from the survey can be summarized in two main domains (physical and mental health). Physical and Mental Health Composite Scores (PCS and MCS) are computed using the scores of 12 questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
6 weeks
Change in SF-12v2 Health Survey
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The Spanish (Mexico) version of the SF-12v2 Health Survey uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. All 12 items from the survey can be summarized in two main domains (physical and mental health). Physical and Mental Health Composite Scores (PCS and MCS) are computed using the scores of 12 questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
12 weeks
Change in SF-12v2 Health Survey
Time Frame: 24 weeks
The Spanish (Mexico) version of the SF-12v2 Health Survey uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. All 12 items from the survey can be summarized in two main domains (physical and mental health). Physical and Mental Health Composite Scores (PCS and MCS) are computed using the scores of 12 questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose E. Gonzalez

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mario A. Simental, MSc, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Facultad de Medicina
  • Study Director: Felix Vilchez, PhD, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Hospital Universitario Dr. José E. González
  • Study Director: Herminia G Martínez, PhD, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Facultad de Medicina

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 30, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 31, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 4, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 20, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 19, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • BI13-001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Acetaminophen

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings