Imaging With 111 Indium (111In)-Pertuzumab (PmAb) to Predict Response to Trastuzumab (TmAb) in Human Epidermal Growth Factor-2 (HER2) Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) or Locally Advanced Breast Cancer (LABC) (PETRA)

June 3, 2016 updated by: Ontario Clinical Oncology Group (OCOG)

Imaging With 111In-Pertuzumab to Predict Response to Trastuzumab in HER2 Positive Metastatic or Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

The general objective of the study is to improve the care of women with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 (HER2) positive metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer by using a radio-labelled biomarker with whole body Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) imaging to predict who will respond to treatment with Trastuzumab.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
3

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
        • Juravinski Cancer Centre
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Metastatic, locally recurrent (local recurrence not amenable to surgical resection of curative intent), or locally advanced (T3 or T4, any N, M0) adenocarcinoma of the breast.
  2. Tumour HER2 positive by immunohistochemistry for HER2 protein over-expression or by Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH) for HER2 gene amplification, as defined by American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines
  3. Initiating treatment with TmAb
  4. Clinically measurable disease (by RECIST for patients with metastatic disease).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Male gender.
  2. Less than 18 years of age.
  3. Life expectancy < 12 weeks.
  4. Only site of metastases is liver.
  5. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of > 2.
  6. Currently receiving PmAb or lapatinib for treatment of MBC.
  7. Having received TmAb as adjuvant therapy within the previous 6 months.
  8. Required to receive another radiopharmaceutical during the first week of the study.
  9. Hypersensitivity to monoclonal antibodies.
  10. Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) < 50% at baseline (within 42 days of study registration) as determined by either echocardiogram (ECHO) or Multi-Gated Acquisition (MUGA) scan.

  11. Hematology and/or biochemistry parameters outside acceptable ranges:

    • absolute neutrophil count <1,500 cells/mm3,
    • platelet count <100,000 cells/mm3,
    • hemoglobin <9 g/dL,
    • total bilirubin > upper limit of normal (ULN) (unless subject has documented Gilbert's Syndrome),
    • aspartate aminotransferase (AST) [serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase(SGOT)] and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) [serum glutamic pyruvate transaminase(SGPT)] >2.5 × ULN,
    • serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dL or 177 μmol/L,
    • alanine aminotransferase (ALP) >2.5 x ULN.
  12. Known pregnancy or lactating female (e.g. positive serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (B-hCG) pregnancy test).
  13. For women of childbearing potential, failure to agree to use a highly effective form of contraception (patient and/or partner, e.g., surgical sterilization) or two effective forms of contraception (a reliable barrier method in conjunction with spermicidal jelly, birth control pills, or contraceptive hormone implants) and to continue its use for the duration of study treatment.
  14. Any condition, which in the investigator's opinion would not make the patient a suitable candidate for inclusion in the trial.
  15. Participation in another clinical trial.
  16. Inability to provide informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: 111In-Pertuzumab + SPECT-CT
Radiopharmaceutical 111In-labeled Pertuzumab given intravenously prior to SPECT-CT imaging.
Other: 111In-Pertuzumab + SPECT-CT
111In-PmAb will be provided ready for injection in a vial by Dr. Reilly's laboratory.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in tumour SUV (Standardized Uptake Value) from baseline to Day 8.
Time Frame: 8 days
The imaging outcome for exploring the association between imaging and clinical outcome is the percent change in tumour SUV from baseline to Day 8 (Day 8 SUV - baseline SUV) /baseline SUV times 100%. The Positron Emission Tomography Evaluation Response Criteria In Solid Tumours (PERCIST) criterion will be used to measure SUV change.
8 days
Safety attributable to 111In-Pertuzumab injections
Time Frame: 3 months
The safety, i.e. toxicities, attributable to 111In-Pertuzumab injections will be evaluated using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Termination for Adverse Events Version 4.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pharmacokinetics (PK) and tumour and normal tissue localization properties of 111In-PmAb will be measured.
Time Frame: 3 months
The pharmacokinetics of 111In-PmAb and tumour and normal tissue localization properties of 111In-PmAb will be measured. Standard PK parameters (t1/2 alpha, t1/2β, V1, Vss and CL) will be calculated.
3 months
Optimal mass dose of 111In-PmAb
Time Frame: 3 months
The dose of 111In-PmAb that is associated with the optimal SPECT-CT images will be established.
3 months
Change in tumour SUV from Baseline to Day 36
Time Frame: 3 months
The imaging outcome for exploring the association between imaging and clinical outcome is the percent change in tumour SUV from baseline to Day 36 (Day 36 SUV - baseline SUV) /baseline SUV times 100%. The Positron Emission Tomography Evaluation Response Criteria In Solid Tumours (PERCIST) criterion will be used to measure SUV change.
3 months
Clinical response (complete or partial) to treatment will be measured using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST) criteria.
Time Frame: 3 months
Clinical response (complete or partial) to treatment will be measured using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST) criteria.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ontario Clinical Oncology Group (OCOG)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mark Levine, Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, McMaster University
  • Principal Investigator: Raymond Reilly, University of Toronto
  • Principal Investigator: Kathleen Pritchard, Ontario Clinical Oncology Group (OCOG)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 12, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 5, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 6, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 6, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 3, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • OCOG-2011-PETRA

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings