Compare Rates of Agreement Between Clinical Diagnosis and Visual Assessment of DaTscan™ Images in Non-Caucasian and Caucasian Subjects With Parkinson's Disease (PD) or Essential Tremor (ET)

October 31, 2017 updated by: GE Healthcare

A Retrospective Clinical Study to Compare the Rates of Agreement Between Clinical Diagnosis and Visual Assessment of DaTscan™ Images in Non-Caucasian and Caucasian Subjects With Parkinson's Disease (PD) or Essential Tremor (ET)

The primary objective of this study is to determine if the diagnostic performance of DaTscan™ single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging is different in non-Caucasian subjects compared with Caucasian subjects with movement disorders.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
204

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Marlborough, Massachusetts, United States, 01752
        • GE Healthcare

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Non-Caucasian and Caucasian Subjects With Parkinson's Disease (PD) or Essential Tremor (ET).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

For Non-Caucasians:

  • Non-Caucasian male and female adult participants (greater than or equal to 18 years of age) with an initial diagnosis of suspected PD or ET who underwent DaTscan SPECT imaging to assist with the participant's final clinical diagnosis of PD or ET.
  • The participant had existing diagnostic-quality and interpretable DaTscan SPECT images of the brain.

For Caucasians:

  • Caucasian male and female adult participants (greater than or equal to 18 years of age) with an initial diagnosis of suspected PD or ET who underwent DaTscan SPECT imaging to assist with the participant's final clinical diagnosis of PD or ET.
  • The participant had existing diagnostic-quality and interpretable DaTscan SPECT images of the brain.
  • The participant was matched by final clinical diagnosis, sex and age (±5 years) with a non-Caucasian participant.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known/suspected structural abnormalities of the brain (e.g., hydrocephalus; brain tumor; stroke; etc.) that could grossly distort the DaTscan images.
  • Participants whose race and ethnic information could not be determined from source document review.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
DaTscan™ - Non-Caucasian Participants
Non-Caucasian participants previously administered DaTscan™, with an initial diagnosis of suspected PD or ET who underwent DaTscan SPECT imaging to assist with the participant's final clinical diagnosis of PD or ET.
Other: DaTscan™ - Non-Caucasian Participants
Participants who previously administered DaTscan™ and had undergone SPECT imaging of the brain per local practice at each institution.
DaTscan™- Caucasian Participants
Caucasian participants previously administered DaTscan™, with an initial diagnosis of suspected PD or ET who underwent DaTscan SPECT imaging to assist with the participant's final clinical diagnosis of PD or ET.
Other: DaTscan™ - Caucasian Participants
Participants who previously administered DaTscan™ and had undergone SPECT imaging of the brain per local practice at each institution.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Positive Percent Agreement of Blinded Visual Assessment of Each Participant's DaTscan Image - Intent-to-diagnose (ITD) Population
Time Frame: Day 1
The majority blinded visual interpretation of each participant's image (3 blinded readers) was compared to his/her final clinical diagnosis, and the image interpretation was classified as true positive, false positive, true negative, or false negative. The counts of each classification type were used to determine the positive percent agreement (PPA, analogous to sensitivity) of the blinded visual image interpretations. The majority assessment was based on ≥ 2 of the 3 readers in agreement on the assessment.
Day 1
Positive Percent Agreement of Blinded Visual Assessment of Each Participant's DaTscan Image - Per Protocol (PP) Population
Time Frame: Day 1
The majority blinded visual interpretation of each participant's image (3 blinded readers) was compared to his/her final clinical diagnosis, and the image interpretation was classified as true positive, false positive, true negative, or false negative. The counts of each classification type were used to determine the positive percent agreement (PPA, analogous to sensitivity) of the blinded visual image interpretations. The majority assessment was based on ≥ 2 of the 3 readers in agreement on the assessment.
Day 1
Negative Percent Agreement of Blinded Visual Assessment of Each Participant's DaTscan Image - Intent-to-diagnose (ITD) Population
Time Frame: Day 1
The majority blinded visual interpretation of each participant's image (3 blinded readers) was compared to his/her final clinical diagnosis, and the image interpretation was classified as true positive, false positive, true negative, or false negative. The counts of each classification type were used to determine the negative percent agreement (NPA, analogous to specificity) of the blinded visual image interpretations. The majority assessment was based on ≥ 2 of the 3 readers in agreement on the assessment.
Day 1
Negative Percent Agreement of Blinded Visual Assessment of Each Participant's DaTscan Image - Per Protocol (PP) Population
Time Frame: Day 1
The majority blinded visual interpretation of each participant's image (3 blinded readers) was compared to his/her final clinical diagnosis, and the image interpretation was classified as true positive, false positive, true negative, or false negative. The counts of each classification type were used to determine the negative percent agreement (NPA, analogous to specificity) of the blinded visual image interpretations. The majority assessment was based on ≥ 2 of the 3 readers in agreement on the assessment.
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Percent Agreement of Blinded Visual Assessment of Each Participant's DaTscan Image - Intent-to-diagnose (ITD) Population
Time Frame: Day 1
Overall percent agreement (OPA) regardless of image interpretation (analogous to accuracy; ratio of number of true results / number of all participants) for each racial group, was tested to determine if it was greater than 80% in both racial groups. The majority assessment was based on ≥2 of the 3 readers in agreement on the assessment.
Day 1
Overall Percent Agreement of Blinded Visual Assessment of Each Participant's DaTscan Image - Per Protocol (PP) Population
Time Frame: Day 1
Overall percent agreement (OPA) regardless of image interpretation (analogous to accuracy; ratio of number of true results / number of all participants) for each racial group, was tested to determine if it was greater than 80% in both racial groups. The majority assessment was based on ≥2 of the 3 readers in agreement on the assessment.
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
GE Healthcare

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Quintiles, Inc.
H2O Clinical LLC

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Jose M Zubeldia, M.D., GE Healthcare

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 30, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 19, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 27, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 30, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 2, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 31, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • GE-001-011

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings