Optical Coherence Tomography to Investigate FFR-Guided DEB-only Elective Coronary Angioplasty (OCTOPUS-2)

April 20, 2014 updated by: Tudor C. Poerner, MD, University of Jena

Fractional Flow Reserve - Guided Elective Coronary Angioplasty Using Paclitaxel - Eluting Balloons With Provisional Stent Implantation: A Phase 4 Feasibility Study With 6-Month Follow-up by Optical Coherence Tomography

We aimed to evaluate feasibility and the 6-month angiographic and OCT results of FFR - guided use of paclitaxel-eluting balloons (Sequent Please™, B Braun) with provisional bare metal stenting for elective PCI of de novo coronary lesions.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Restenosis rates after plain-old balloon angioplasty (POBA) are with 30-50 % very high. Therefore, this interventional concept is of limited use today. However, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is not necessary after POBA. Contrary, 3rd generation drug-eluting stents (DES) proved to be very effective showing delayed restenosis only in 5-15%, but require DAPT for at least 6 months. Drug-eluting balloons (DEB) might be a promising trade-off between POBA and DES, since they effectively inhibit neointimal proliferation despite minimal duration of DAPT. However, there is still very limited data on this interventional strategy. Thus, we aimed to investigate feasibility of fractional flow reserve (FFR) - guided use of paclitaxel-eluting balloons (Sequent Please™, B Braun) with provisional bare metal stenting for elective PCI of de novo coronary lesions, evaluating the 6-month outcomes by angiography and optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Jena, Germany, 07747
        • University Hospital of Jena, Heart Center, Division of Cardiology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Indication for elective PCI according to the guidelines of European Society of Cardiology, American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology
  • Age > 18 years, written consent
  • Native de novo coronary lesion suitable for angioplasty and OCT imaging

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy and breast feeding mother
  • Co-morbidity with an estimated life expectancy of < 50 % at 1 year
  • Scheduled major surgery in the next 6 months
  • Not able to give informed written consent or non-compliance
  • Participation in other PCI trial
  • Acute coronary syndromes and cardiogenic shock
  • Known allergy to aspirin, thienopyridines or against taxol derivates
  • Culprit lesion within the proximal 10 mm of the right or left coronary artery
  • Saphenous vein grafts
  • Estimated lesion length > 30 mm

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: FFR - guided DEB angioplasty
DEB-only angioplasty is attempted in all patients. At baseline, quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) using an intracoronary standard bolus of adenosine are performed. If FFR at baseline is greater than 0.8, PCI is deferred, otherwise predilation with a non-coated balloon is performed. In case of severe recoil (> 50% residual stenosis) or flow-limiting dissection the procedure is deemed not suitable for DEB-only angioplasty and stent implantation is performed at the discretion of the operator. In all other cases, the lesion is treated using a Sequent Please® paclitaxel-eluting balloon (DEB). QCA and FFR measurements are repeated and the result is considered satisfactory if there is no flow-limiting dissection, residual stenosis < 40% and FFR > 0.8.
Device: FFR - guided DEB angioplasty
DEB-only angioplasty is attempted in all patients. At baseline, quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) using an intracoronary standard bolus of adenosine are performed. If FFR at baseline is greater than 0.8, PCI is deferred, otherwise predilation with a non-coated balloon is performed. In case of severe recoil (> 50% residual stenosis) or flow-limiting dissection the procedure is deemed not suitable for DEB-only angioplasty and stent implantation is performed at the discretion of the operator. In all other cases, the lesion is treated using a Sequent Please® paclitaxel-eluting balloon (DEB). QCA and FFR measurements are repeated and the result is considered satisfactory if there is no flow-limiting dissection, residual stenosis < 40% and FFR > 0.8.
Other Names:
  • Sequent Please® paclitaxel-eluting balloon (DEB)
OTHER: DEB angioplasty with provisional bare metal stenting
In case of suboptimal results after the FFR-guided DEB angioplasty described above, a bare metal stent is implanted inside the segment previously treated by DEB.
Device: FFR - guided DEB angioplasty
DEB-only angioplasty is attempted in all patients. At baseline, quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) using an intracoronary standard bolus of adenosine are performed. If FFR at baseline is greater than 0.8, PCI is deferred, otherwise predilation with a non-coated balloon is performed. In case of severe recoil (> 50% residual stenosis) or flow-limiting dissection the procedure is deemed not suitable for DEB-only angioplasty and stent implantation is performed at the discretion of the operator. In all other cases, the lesion is treated using a Sequent Please® paclitaxel-eluting balloon (DEB). QCA and FFR measurements are repeated and the result is considered satisfactory if there is no flow-limiting dissection, residual stenosis < 40% and FFR > 0.8.
Other Names:
  • Sequent Please® paclitaxel-eluting balloon (DEB)
Device: Provisional bare metal stenting
In case of suboptimal results after the FFR-guided DEB angioplasty described above, a bare metal stent is implanted inside the segment previously treated by DEB.
Other Names:
  • Coroflex Blue® bare metal stent (BMS)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Late lumen loss
Time Frame: 6 months
Late lumen loss (LLL, expressed in mm) measured within the treated segment by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) as the difference between minimal luminal diameter (MLD) at the end of the interventional procedure and MLD at 6-month follow-up
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Vessel remodeling assessed by optical coherence tomography
Time Frame: 6 months
Lumen and vessel measurements, neointimal proliferation, plaque composition and dissection healing within the treated vessel segment at 6 months assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) with 3D-reconstruction
6 months
Net lumen gain
Time Frame: 6 months
Net lumen gain (NLG, expressed in mm) measured by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) as the difference between minimal luminal diameter within the treated segment (MLD) at 6-month follow-up and MLD at the lesion site at baseline
6 months
Need for revascularization of the treated vessel segment
Time Frame: 6 months
Need for revascularization of the treated vessel segment (target lesion revascularization, TLR) driven either clinically or after 6-month angiographic follow-up
6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiac death or acute myocardial infarction due to target vessel failure
Time Frame: 6 month
Cardiac death or acute myocardial infarction occurring in the presence of occlusion or severe flow limitation of the treated vessel
6 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Jena

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
B. Braun Melsungen AG

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Tudor C Poerner, MD, University Hospital of Jena, Heart Center, Cardiology Division
  • Study Chair: Hans R Figulla, MD, University Hospital of Jena, Heart Center, Cardiology Divisio

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 19, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 20, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 23, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 23, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 20, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • UKJ-TCP-2

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings