Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Fixed-dose Brexpiprazole (OPC-34712) as Adjunctive Therapy in the Treatment of Adults With Major Depressive Disorder With and Without Anxious Distress

August 17, 2018 updated by: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of Fixed-dose Brexpiprazole (OPC-34712) as Adjunctive Therapy in the Treatment of Adults With Major Depressive Disorder With and Without Anxious Distress

The purpose of this study is to assess the tolerability, safety, and efficacy of brexpiprazole (2.0 mg/day) as adjunctive therapy in adult subjects with a diagnosis of MDD with and without anxious distress

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The introduction of atypical antipsychotics has created a renewed interest in adjunctive therapy for MDD, particularly for treatment-resistant MDD. Several atypical antipsychotics have been shown to enhance the response to ADT. This is a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose trial designed to assess the safety and efficacy of brexpiprazole (2.0 mg/day) as adjunctive therapy to an assigned open-label ADT in depressed subjects with and without anxious distress.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
837

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Achim, Germany
      • Berlin, Germany
      • Dusseldorf, Germany
      • Frankfurt, Germany
      • Freiburg, Germany
      • Oranienburg, Germany
      • Stralsund, Germany
      • Wurzburg, Germany
  • Hungary
      • Budapest, Hungary
      • Gyor, Hungary
  • Poland
      • Gdansk, Poland
      • Lubin, Poland
      • Sosnowiec, Poland
      • Warszawa, Poland
  • Slovakia
      • Bratislava, Slovakia
      • Kosice-Barca, Slovakia
      • Liptovsky Mikulas, Slovakia
  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States
    • California
      • Beverly Hills, California, United States
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States
    • Florida
      • Hialeah, Florida, United States
      • Orlando, Florida, United States
    • Georgia
      • Alpharetta, Georgia, United States
      • Smyrna, Georgia, United States
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    • Michigan
      • Rochester Hills, Michigan, United States
    • New Jersey
      • Cherry Hill, New Jersey, United States
    • New York
      • Jamaica, New York, United States
      • New York, New York, United States
      • Staten Island, New York, United States
    • North Carolina
      • Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
    • Oklahoma
      • Edmond, Oklahoma, United States
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States
      • Salem, Oregon, United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
    • Rhode Island
      • Lincoln, Rhode Island, United States
    • South Carolina
      • Columbia, South Carolina, United States
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States
    • Texas
      • Wichita Falls, Texas, United States
    • Utah
      • Murray, Utah, United States
    • Vermont
      • Woodstock, Vermont, United States
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States
      • Spokane, Washington, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and Female subjects between 18-65 years of age, with diagnosis of major depressive disorder with or without anxious distress
  • Current depressive episode must be at least 8 weeks in duration

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with a history of Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome or Serotonin Syndrome
  • Subjects who report an inadequate response to more than 3 antidepressant treatments in the current episode
  • Subjects with a current Axis I diagnosis of: Delirium, dementia, amnestic or other cognitive disorder, Schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or other psychotic disorder, Bipolar I or II disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Brexpiprazole + ADT
Drug: Brexpiprazole +ADT
Brexpiprazole + ADT Tablet, Oral, 2mg brexpiprazole and FDA Approved Antidepressant (ADT)
Placebo Comparator: Placebo + ADT
Drug: Placebo + ADT
Placebo + ADT Placebo + FDA Approved Antidepressant (ADT)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression
Time Frame: From baseline (end of Phase A [Week 8]) to week 14
To assess the change in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score from Baseline (End of Phase A [Week 8]) to Week 14. The MADRS was utilized as the primary efficacy assessment of the participant's level of depression and was administered utilizing the Structured Interview Guide for the MADRS (SIGMA). The MADRS consisted of 10 items each with 7 defined grades of severity. The rater decided whether the rating lied on predefined scale steps (0, 2, 4, 6) or between them (1, 3, 5). The 10 items were apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, suicidal thoughts. Each item was scored using a scale of 0 to 6 (a higher score indicates increased severity). The maximum total score was 60; 0, no symptom; 60, severely affected.
From baseline (end of Phase A [Week 8]) to week 14

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) From Baseline to End of Treatment
Time Frame: From baseline (end of Phase A [Week 8]) to week 14
To assess the change in the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Score (the mean of 3 individual item scores) from Baseline (End of Phase A [Week 8]) to Week 14 (End of Phase B). SDS was a 3-item clinician-rated questionnaire used to evaluate impairments in the domains of work, social life, and family life/home responsibility. Each item was scored using a scale of 0 to 10 (a higher score indicates symptoms have disrupted work, social life, and family life/home responsibility extremely). The maximum total score was 30; 0 = not at all, to 30 = extremely.
From baseline (end of Phase A [Week 8]) to week 14
Change From End of Phase A to End of Phase B in MADRS Total Score for the Subpopulation With <25% Improvement From Baseline of Phase A to End of Phase A in MADRS Total Score
Time Frame: From baseline (end of Phase A [Week 8]) to week 14
To assess the change from end of Phase A (Week 8 visit) to end of Phase B (Week 14 visit) in MADRS Total Score for the subpopulation with < 25% improvement from baseline of Phase A (Week 0) to end of Phase A (Week 8) in MADRS Total Score. The MADRS was utilized as the primary efficacy assessment of the participant's level of depression and was administered utilizing the Structured Interview Guide for the MADRS (SIGMA). The MADRS consisted of 10 items each with 7 defined grades of severity. The 10 items were apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, suicidal thoughts. Each item was scored using a scale of 0 to 6 (a higher score indicates increased severity). The maximum total score was 60; 0, no symptom; 60, severely affected.
From baseline (end of Phase A [Week 8]) to week 14
Change From End of Phase A to End of Phase B in MADRS Total Score for the Subpopulations With Anxious Distress as Specified in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-V).
Time Frame: From baseline (end of Phase A [Week 8]) to week 14
To assess the change from end of Phase A (Week 8) to end of Phase B (Week 14) in MADRS Total Score for the subpopulations with anxious distress as specified in DSM-V. The MADRS was utilized as the primary efficacy assessment of the participant's level of depression and was administered utilizing the Structured Interview Guide for the MADRS (SIGMA). The MADRS consisted of 10 items each with 7 defined grades of severity. The 10 items were apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, suicidal thoughts. Each item was scored using a scale of 0 to 6 (a higher score indicates increased severity). The maximum total score was 60; 0, no symptom; 60, severely affected.
From baseline (end of Phase A [Week 8]) to week 14

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
H. Lundbeck A/S

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Claudette Brewer, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 18, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 18, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 22, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 21, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 17, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 331-13-214

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings