A Study Assessing the Safety and Utility of PINPOINT® Near Infrared Fluorescence Imaging in the Identification of Lymph Nodes in Patients With Uterine and Cervical Malignancies Who Are Undergoing Lymph Node Mapping (FILM)
A Randomized, Prospective, Open Label, Multicenter Study Assessing the Safety and Utility of PINPOINT® Near Infrared Fluorescence Imaging in the Identification of Lymph Nodes in Patients With Uterine and Cervical Malignancies Who Are Undergoing Lymph Node Mapping
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
-
-
Quebec
-
Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- CHU de Quebec - Universite Laval
-
-
-
-
-
Caguas, Puerto Rico
- Hospital HIMA San Pablo
-
-
-
-
California
-
San Jose, California, United States
- O'Connor Hospital
-
-
Florida
-
Fort Myers, Florida, United States
- Lee Memorial Hospital
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States
- Memorial Sloan Kettering
-
-
North Carolina
-
Durham, North Carolina, United States
- Duke Cancer Institute
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States
- MD Anderson Cancer Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years of age or older
- Subjects with FIGO Clinical Stage I endometrial cancer undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy with lymph node mapping.
- Subjects with FIGO Clinical Stage IA cervical cancer ≤ 2 cm in size undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy, trachelectomy, or conization with lymph node mapping. Subjects with clinical Stage IA1 cervical cancer without lympho vascular space involvement (LVSI) and negative margins on cone biopsy are not to be included.
- Subjects with negative nodal status (N0)
- Subjects with negative metastatic involvement (M0).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Have had prior dissection and/or radiation in pelvis.
- Advanced cervical or endometrial cancer, T3/T4 lesions
- Diagnosis of cervical cancer with a tumor size greater than 2 cm.
- Locally advanced or inflammatory cervical or uterine cancer
- Metastatic cervical or uterine cancer.
- Known allergy or history of adverse reaction to ICG, iodine or iodine dyes.
- Known allergy or history of adverse reaction to Blue dye (Isosulfan blue) or triphenylmethane.
- Hepatic dysfunction defined as MELD Score > 12.
- Renal dysfunction defined as serum creatinine ≥ 2.0 mg/dl.
- Subjects who have participated in another investigational study within 30 days prior to surgery.
- Pregnant or lactating subjects.
- Subjects who, in the Investigator's opinion, have any medical condition that makes the subject a poor candidate for the investigational procedure, or interferes with the interpretation of study results.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Blue - PINPOINT
The cervix will be injected 4 times with a 1ml solution of 1% Isosulfan blue followed by injection 4 times of 1 ml of 1.25 mg/ml solution of ICG.
LN mapping with Blue dye will be performed until the investigator identifies all blue nodes or determines that blue nodes cannot be identified.
Once complete, the Investigator will begin mapping with PINPOINT until all 'ICG' nodes are identified or the investigator determines that 'ICG' nodes cannot be identified.
Once mapping with both Blue dye and PINPOINT have been completed and documented, LNs identified with Blue dye or PINPOINT will be excised.
|
PINPOINT® Near Infrared Fluorescence Imaging to identify lymph nodes
|
|
Active Comparator: PINPOINT - Blue
The cervix will be injected 4 times with 1 ml of a 1.25 mg/ml solution of ICG followed by injection 4 times of a 1 ml solution of 1% Isosulfan blue.
LN mapping with PINPOINT will be performed until the investigator identifies all 'ICG' nodes or determines that 'ICG' nodes cannot be identified.
Once complete, the Investigator will begin mapping with Blue dye until all 'blue' nodes are identified or the investigator determines that 'blue' nodes cannot be identified.
Once mapping with both Blue dye and PINPOINT have been completed and documented, LNs identified with Blue dye or PINPOINT will be excised.
|
PINPOINT® Near Infrared Fluorescence Imaging to identify lymph nodes
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Effectiveness of PINPOINT and IC2000 in the Identification of Lymph Nodes Defined as the Proportion of Confirmed Lymph Nodes Identified
Time Frame: Day 0
|
To assess the effectiveness of intraoperative PINPOINT Near Infrared Fluorescence Imaging in the identification of lymph nodes in subjects with uterine and cervical malignancies who are undergoing lymph node mapping.
|
Day 0
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Effectiveness of PINPOINT and Blue Dye in the Identification of at Least One Lymph Node Defined as the Number of Subjects in Which at Least One Confirmed Lymph Node Was Identified With Either PINPOINT or Blue Dye
Time Frame: Day 0
|
To evaluate the effectiveness of PINPOINT and Blue dye in the identification of at least one lymph node (confirmed to be lymphoid tissue) per subject.
|
Day 0
|
|
Effectiveness of PINPOINT and Blue Dye in the Identification of Bilateral Lymph Nodes Defined as the Number of Subjects in Which Lymph Nodes Were Identified Bilaterally With Either PINPOINT or Blue Dye.
Time Frame: Day 0
|
To evaluate the effectiveness of PINPOINT and Blue dye in the identification of bilateral lymph nodes (confirmed to be lymphoid tissue).
|
Day 0
|
|
Identification of Lymph Nodes Following Lymphatic Channels Defined as the Number of Subjects in Which Confirmed Lymph Nodes Were Identified by Following a Lymphatic Channel With Either PINPOINT or Blue Dye.
Time Frame: Day 0
|
To determine the proportion of lymph nodes identified from following lymphatic channels
|
Day 0
|
|
Safety of Interstitial Injection of ICG Defined as the Number of Adverse Effects Related to ICG
Time Frame: Day 0 to Day 30
|
To assess the safety of interstitial injection of ICG for intraoperative lymphatic mapping, as measured by number of subjects experiencing adverse effects related to the study treatment.
|
Day 0 to Day 30
|
|
Anatomic Distribution of Lymph Nodes
Time Frame: Day 0
|
To determine the anatomic distribution of lymph nodes
|
Day 0
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- PP LNM 01
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.