Lung Cancer Radiotherapy Using Realtime Dynamic Multileaf Collimator (MLC) Adaptation And Radiofrequency Tracking (LIGHTSABR)
Phase I Feasibility Study of Lung Cancer Radiotherapy Using Realtime Dynamic Multileaf Collimator (MLC) Adaptation and Radiofrequency Tracking
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New South Wales
-
St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia, 2112
- Royal North Shore Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 18 or older
- Has provided written Informed Consent for participation in this trial and is willing to comply with the study
- Patients undergoing external beam radiotherapy at Northern Sydney Cancer Centre
- Histologically proven Stage I Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) oligometastatic lung metastases (3 or less). Histological diagnosis will be obtained if clinically indicated.
- MRI/4D-CT prior to insertion of Calypso beacons
- Patient must be able to have Varian Calypso beacons placed in the lung (if on anticoagulants, must be cleared by Local Medical Officer (LMO) or cardiologist).
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2
- Body habitus enabling Calypso tracking (as per Calypso Determining a Patient's Localisation Designation & Orientation before implantation)
- A maximum of three metastases to the lung from any non-haematological malignancy. Multiple metastases will be treated separately.
- Tumour diameter ≤ = 5cm
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous high-dose thoracic radiotherapy.
- Less than two Calypso beacons implanted in the lung.
- Calypso beacons are spaced by greater than 9cm or less than 1cm.
- Calypso beacons are less than 19cm from outer chest wall
- Cytotoxic chemotherapy within 3 weeks of commencement of treatment, or concurrently with treatment. Hormonal manipulation agents are allowable (e.g. aromatase inhibitors, selective oestrogen receptor modulators, and gonadotropin releasing hormone receptor modulators)
- Targeted agents (such as sunitinib, bevacizumab and tarceva) within 7 days of commencement of treatment, or concurrently with treatment
- Women who are pregnant or lactating.
- Unwilling or unable to give informed consent
- Unwilling or unable to complete quality of life questionnaires
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Standard SABR
Patients receive standard treatment
|
|
|
Experimental: MLC Tracking SABR
Patients are treated with MLC tracking
|
Treat patient with Non FDA approved MLC Tracking
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
To demonstrate feasibility of MLC tracking for lung cancer
Time Frame: Assessed at 2 years
|
Percentage of fractions delivered without software or mechanical failure
|
Assessed at 2 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Audio Visual (AV) Biofeedback
Time Frame: Assessed at 2 years
|
Fraction of patients for whom AV biofeedback improves breathing regularity
|
Assessed at 2 years
|
|
Coefficient of variation in breathing patterns
Time Frame: Assessed at 2 years
|
Breathing variations over imaging and treatment sessions with and without AV biofeedback using a statistical process for coefficient of variation
|
Assessed at 2 years
|
|
Target volumes
Time Frame: Assessed at 2 years
|
Target volumes between the 4 Dimensional (4D) planning MLC tracking and Internal Target Volume (ITV) (standard) planning
|
Assessed at 2 years
|
|
Lung dose
Time Frame: Assessed at 2 years
|
Difference in dose to healthy lung in treatment plans between 4D planning and ITV planning
|
Assessed at 2 years
|
|
Treated dose - MLC tracking
Time Frame: Assessed at 2 years
|
Difference between the treated dose and planned dose for MLC tracking
|
Assessed at 2 years
|
|
Treated dose - standard
Time Frame: Assessed at 2 years
|
Difference between the estimated treated dose and planned dose for ITV treatments
|
Assessed at 2 years
|
|
4D Cone Beam CT (CBCT) image quality
Time Frame: Assessed at 2 years
|
Image quality and target position differences between the Calypso-based 4D CBCT image reconstruction and Revs Per Minute (RPM)-based 4D CBCT image reconstruction using Feldkamp filtered backprojection (FDK and iterative reconstruction algorithms.
|
Assessed at 2 years
|
|
Breathing variations with and without continuous positive air pressure (CPAP)
Time Frame: At time of treatment
|
To quantify the breathing variations over treatment sessions with and without application of continuous positive air pressure (CPAP)
|
At time of treatment
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Outcomes - Composite
Time Frame: 5 years
|
Participants will be followed for 5 years to determine patient outcome3s, including radiation therapy toxicity, local control (whether the tumour has spread) and survival.
|
5 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Thomas Eade, MD, RNSH
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Caillet V, Zwan B, Briggs A, Hardcastle N, Szymura K, Prodreka A, O'Brien R, Harris BE, Greer P, Haddad C, Jayamanne D, Eade T, Booth J, Keall P. Geometric uncertainty analysis of MLC tracking for lung SABR. Phys Med Biol. 2020 Dec 2;65(23):235040. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/abb0c6.
- Booth J, Caillet V, Briggs A, Hardcastle N, Angelis G, Jayamanne D, Shepherd M, Podreka A, Szymura K, Nguyen DT, Poulsen P, O'Brien R, Harris B, Haddad C, Eade T, Keall P. MLC tracking for lung SABR is feasible, efficient and delivers high-precision target dose and lower normal tissue dose. Radiother Oncol. 2021 Feb;155:131-137. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.10.036. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- HREC/15/HAWKE/55
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.