Psychosocial Benefits of Gratitude Journals
Psychosocial Benefits of Gratitude Journals: A Randomized Controlled Intervention Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Munster
-
Limerick, Munster, Ireland, ROI
- University of Limerick
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- English language proficiency
Exclusion Criteria:
- under the age of 18
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Reflective Interpersonal Gratitude
An interpersonal gratitude journal, designed to foster gratitude for one's existing social relationships, by writing and reflecting on people and positive daily encounters for which one is grateful.
|
Participants were given the following instructions in their journal: Writing is a great way to reflect on your daily events, helping to look back and focus on the good things in our lives.
There are many things in our lives, big and small, which we might be grateful for.
For the next three weeks, 3 times a week (9 days in total), reflect back on your day and think of the people you met and interacted with and are grateful for.
Please write down in the space provided a number of positive social interactions over the day or friendships/relationships you are grateful for…..
|
|
Experimental: Reflective-Behavioral Gratitude
An interpersonal gratitude journal, designed to foster gratitude for one's existing social relationships, by writing and reflecting on people and positive daily encounters for which one is grateful.
In addition participants are asked to choose a friend express this gratitude to them at the end of each week.
|
Participants were given the following identical instructions as the reflective journal in addition to this "At the end of each week, express this gratitude to a friend of your choice face-to-face or through e-mail, facebook, a kind note, tell him/her how much you appreciate something specific that he/she does and reflect on how your friend's reaction and how you feel."
|
|
Active Comparator: Neutral Control Journal
Write about and reflect on things that occurred over the course of the day.
|
Writing is a great way to reflect on your daily events, helping to look back and reflect on our lives.
For the next three weeks, 3 times a week (9 days in total), please write in the spaces provided things that happened during the day.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS). Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985).
Time Frame: Baseline, immediate post-intervention at three weeks,1 month, 3 months
|
Used to assess changes in life satisfaction levels over the course of the intervention and follow-ups.
|
Baseline, immediate post-intervention at three weeks,1 month, 3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
National Institute of Health Social Relationships Companionship Scale which assess Friendship Quality and Loneliness. Cyranowski, J. M., Zill, N., Bode, R., Butt, Z., Kelly, M. A., Pilkonis, P. A., & Cella, D. (2013).
Time Frame: Baseline, immediate post-intervention at three weeks,1 month, 3 months
|
Used to assess changes in social relationships over the course of the intervention and follow-ups.
|
Baseline, immediate post-intervention at three weeks,1 month, 3 months
|
|
The Gratitude Questionnaire-Six Item Form (GQ-6) McCullough, M. E., Emmons, R. A., & Tsang, J. (2002).
Time Frame: Baseline, immediate post-intervention at three weeks,1 month, 3 months
|
Used to assess changes in gratitude levels over the course of the intervention and follow-ups.
|
Baseline, immediate post-intervention at three weeks,1 month, 3 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Expression of Gratitude in Relationships Scale. Lambert, N. M., Clarke, M. S., Durtschi, J. A., Fincham, F. D., & Graham, S. M. (2010).
Time Frame: Baseline, immediate post-intervention at three weeks,1 month, 3 months
|
Used to assess changes in levels of gratitude expression over the course of the intervention and follow-ups.
|
Baseline, immediate post-intervention at three weeks,1 month, 3 months
|
|
The Four- item Relationship Satisfaction Scale. Funk, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2007).
Time Frame: Baseline, immediate post-intervention at three weeks,1 month, 3 months
|
Used to assess changes in relationship satisfaction levels over the course of the intervention and follow-ups.
|
Baseline, immediate post-intervention at three weeks,1 month, 3 months
|
|
Depressive symptoms: CES-D 10 (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale 10 item scale) Short Form. Andresen, E. M., Malmgren, J. A., Carter, W. B., & Patrick, D. L. (1994).
Time Frame: Baseline, immediate post-intervention at three weeks,,1 month, 3 months
|
Used to assess changes in depressive symptom levels over the course of the intervention and follow-ups.
|
Baseline, immediate post-intervention at three weeks,,1 month, 3 months
|
|
Relationship closeness: Inclusion of other in the Self Scale Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992).
Time Frame: Baseline, immediate post-intervention at three weeks,1 month, 3 months
|
Used to assess changes in relationship closeness over the course of the intervention and follow-ups.
|
Baseline, immediate post-intervention at three weeks,1 month, 3 months
|
|
Scale of Positive and Negative Experiences , can use the Positive Feelings/affect subscale Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi. D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2009).
Time Frame: Baseline, immediate post-intervention at three weeks,1 month, 3 months
|
potential moderator
|
Baseline, immediate post-intervention at three weeks,1 month, 3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Brenda O' Connell, B.A, University of Limerick
- Study Director: Stephen Gallagher, PhD, University of Limerick
- Study Director: Deirdre O'Shea, PhD, University of Limerick
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- GratitudeJournal2015
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.