ACCU-CHEK Connect Personal Diabetes Management Study (PDM CONNECT)

October 6, 2017 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche

ACCU-CHEK Connect Personal Diabetes Management Study (PDM)

This post-market, interventional, prospective, single arm, the United States (US) based multi-center study will assess the change in treatment satisfaction of participants who utilize the ACCU-CHEK Connect Diabetes Management System over a period of 6 months.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
122

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Montgomery, Alabama, United States, 36105
    • California
      • Huntington Beach, California, United States, 92648
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30318
      • Macon, Georgia, United States, 31210
    • Mississippi
      • Ocean Springs, Mississippi, United States, 39564
    • Nebraska
      • Lincoln, Nebraska, United States, 68521
    • North Carolina
      • Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27609
      • Wilmington, North Carolina, United States, 28401
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pottstown, Pennsylvania, United States, 19464
    • Tennessee
      • Bristol, Tennessee, United States, 37620
    • Texas
      • Plano, Texas, United States, 75075

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes for greater than or equal to (>=) 6 months
  • Currently using insulin as a component of the diabetes therapy
  • Allow and be able to provide self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) data at least 1 month prior to study start
  • SMBG frequency as confirmed by site SMBG data download of participants meter(s): Basal insulin treated participants - SMBG >=5 times per week and Multiple dose insulin participants - SMBG >=2 times per day
  • Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of >=7.5 percentage (per local laboratory obtained less than or equal to [<= 3] months of Baseline)
  • Able to read and write in English language
  • Currently using a Smartphone and have experience with downloading at minimum one application
  • Smartphone compatibility; must be able to download the ACCU-CHEK Connect system application accordingly
  • Naive to the ACCU-CHEK Connect system
  • Willing to comply with study procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment with insulin pump therapy
  • Any use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to manage their diabetes during the course of the study
  • Visually impaired
  • Women who are pregnant, lactating or planning to become pregnant during the study period
  • Diagnosed with any clinically significant condition (for example anemia, major organ system disease, infections, psychosis or cognitive impairment)
  • Participant requires chronic steroid in adrenal suppressive doses, other immuno-modulatory medication or chemotherapy
  • Participant is the investigator or any sub-investigator, general practitioner, practice staff, pharmacist, research assistant or other staff or relative of those directly involved in the conduct of the study and design of the protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: ACCU-CHEK
All participants will utilize ACCU-CHEK Connect Diabetes Management System containing three primary components: ACCU-CHEK Aviva Connect Blood Glucose Monitoring System intended to be used for the quantitative measurement of glucose, ACCU-CHEK Connect Diabetes Management App indicated as an aid in the treatment of diabetes, and ACCU-CHEK Connect Online Diabetes Management System indicated for use by persons with diabetes or by healthcare professionals in the home or in healthcare facilities.
Device: ACCU-CHEK
ACCU-CHEK Connect Diabetes Management System contains ACCU-CHEK Aviva Connect Blood Glucose Monitoring System, ACCU-CHEK Connect Diabetes Management App, and ACCU-CHEK Connect Online Diabetes Management System.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment Satisfaction: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQc) Score at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for change from Baseline (DTSQc) to study end contains 6 items which can be rated from -3='much worse now' to 3='much better now'). The total score is the sum of the scores of the 6 items and ranges from -18 to 18. A higher score indicates more satisfaction. This questionnaire was administered at the end of the study (Week 24) only.
Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
Participants rated their level of diabetes distress by answering 17 questions in in the following areas: Regimen-related Distress, Emotional Burden, Diabetes-related Interpersonal Distress and Physician-related Distress (PD) on a 6-point scale: 1=Not a problem to 6=A very serious problem. The Average Total score ranged from 1 (best) to 6 (worst). Results were calculated using a Linear Mixed Model with study group, visit, group-by-visit interaction, baseline DDS, gender, age, and race as fixed effects; and site and subject as random effects. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Baseline, Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Weeks 12 and 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Assessment of HbA1c is an indicator of long-term control of diabetes.
Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Percentage of Glucose Readings in Target Range
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
Glucose target range was specified as 70-180 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL).
Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Mean Blood Glucose Level
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
Blood glucose is a type of sugar in blood and is measured to assess a participant's control of diabetes.
Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Glycemic Variability
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
Glycemic variability refers to swings in blood glucose levels. Mean glycemic variability is expressed as a standard deviation of blood glucose data. A negative number indicates a decrease in glucose variability. A positive number indicates and increase in glucose variability.
Baseline, Week 24
Incidence of Hypoglycemia
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
A hypoglycemic reading was defined as a glucose value that fell below the 70 mg/dL level. The incidence of hypoglycemia was defined as the number of hypoglycemic readings in the interval divided by the total number of blood glucose checks in the interval.
Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Number of Participants With Competency in Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
Competency was defined as appropriate response to high and low glucose values.
Week 24
Percent of Follow-Up Visits With Sufficient SMBG Data
Time Frame: Up to Week 24
Sufficient SMBG data is based on the ability of the healthcare provider to make informed decisions regarding therapy adjustments.
Up to Week 24
Change From Baseline in the Number of Blood Glucose Checks at Weeks 12 and 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
An increase in the number of blood glucose checks indicates more glycemic control.
Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) Frequency at Weeks 12 and 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
An increase in SMBG frequency indicates more glycemic control. The average number of daily SMBG measurements per interval was calculated based on the total number of blood glucose readings recorded during the study visit interval.
Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Percentage of Blood Glucose Tagged Data
Time Frame: Weeks 12 and 24
Tagged data specifies the timing of blood glucose recording and includes: fasting, before breakfast, after breakfast, before lunch, after lunch, before dinner, after dinner, and bedtime. The percentage of blood glucose tagged data per interval was calculated as the total number of tagged blood glucose readings during the interval divided by the total number of readings within the interval.
Weeks 12 and 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hoffmann-La Roche

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Roche Diabetes Care GmbH

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Lena Borsa, Hoffmann-La Roche

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 30, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 29, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 20, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 6, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 6, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 9, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 6, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 6, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RD002206

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Clinical Trials on ACCU-CHEK

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings