Physical Activity Interventions for Leg Ulcer Patients (FOOTFIT)

September 5, 2018 updated by: Teresa Kelechi, Medical University of South Carolina
The goal of this study is to test FOOTFIT and enhanced FOOTFIT+, home-based mobile health (mHealth) physical activity (PA) interventions for a minimally ambulatory, chronically-ill, population with leg ulcers. A highly sensitive clinically designed Bluetooth® enabled accelerometer and tracking device (BEAT) worn on the foot during a progressive and evidence-based non-exertive leg conditioning activities for lower leg function (CALF) captures minute foot movements and sends the data to a Smartphone. This six-week feasibility study will compare FOOTFIT to FOOTFIT+, with the added connectivity feature, to promote patient-provider communication, evaluate adherence to PA, and assess signals of efficacy on functional outcomes in a very low fitness population.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

FOOTFIT is a study of a lower leg conditioning mHealth intervention for patients with venous leg ulcers. The aims are to compare two versions, one of which is enhanced (FOOTFIT+), to determine which has the greatest impact on physical activity adherence, patient-provider communication, and leg function. FOOTFIT and FOOTFIT+ share three components: 1) a low-cost, tri-axial Bluetooth® enabled highly sensitive accelerometer and tracking device (BEAT) worn on the foot during, 2) phased conditioning activities for lower leg function (CALF) tracked by a, 3) Smartphone that captures signals from BEAT, provides motivational messages, CALF instruction, and automated feedback on progress. Forty patients will be targeted in this six-week study, 20 of which will receive FOOTFIT and 20 FOOTFIT+.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
24

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • South Carolina
      • Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States, 29303
        • Spartanburg Regional Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Active venous leg ulcer
  • Ankle brachial index 0.80 to 1.3 mmHg, a measure of arterial sufficiency
  • Sedentary-able to only walk a few steps at a time or not farther than 10 feet
  • Not currently exercising or participate in a PA or physical therapy program
  • Receives at least weekly wound care anticipated to last for at least six weeks from start of study
  • Able to don accelerometer - if unable to apply independently, has assistance from other
  • Capable of using Smartphone

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Co-morbid conditions such as stroke (limits ankle function)
  • Ulcer from other causes (arterial, diabetic, trauma, surgery)
  • Documented cognitive impairment (MiniCog)
  • No 3G service in area where patient resides

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: FOOTFIT Plus
The intervention consists of: 1) a prescribed, evidence-based, phased, non-exertive physical activity conditioning activities for lower leg function (CALF) movements that are to be performed daily at home; 2) a low-cost, tri-axial Bluetooth® enabled highly sensitive motion-sensing accelerometer and tracking device (BEAT) worn on the foot during CALF to capture frequency and intensity of foot movements; and 3) a Smartphone that receives foot movement data, provides automated educational/motivational messages, and reports and allows regular communication with the wound care provider on progress.
Device: FOOTFIT
Individuals with venous leg ulcers will be instructed on physical activity movements for their lower legs to be performed over six weeks while wearing a foot based activity monitor (accelerometer) that will send them motivational messages and progress reports. For those in the FOOTFIT Plus group, individuals will have the option to communicate with their wound care provider via text messages, emails or phone calls.
Experimental: FOOTFIT
The intervention consists of: 1) a prescribed, evidence-based, phased, non-exertive physical activity conditioning activities for lower leg function (CALF) movements that are to be performed daily at home; 2) a low-cost, tri-axial Bluetooth® enabled highly sensitive motion-sensing accelerometer and tracking device (BEAT) worn on the foot during CALF to capture frequency and intensity of foot movements; and 3) a Smartphone that receives foot movement data, provides automated educational/motivational messages, and reports. There is not regular communication with the wound care provider on progress.
Device: FOOTFIT
Individuals with venous leg ulcers will be instructed on physical activity movements for their lower legs to be performed over six weeks while wearing a foot based activity monitor (accelerometer) that will send them motivational messages and progress reports. For those in the FOOTFIT Plus group, individuals will have the option to communicate with their wound care provider via text messages, emails or phone calls.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
FOOTFIT feasibility
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Measure adherence by recording frequency and intensity of foot/toe movements reported in minutes.
6 weeks
FOOTFIT reach
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Measure reach, recorded as qualitative documents on a log of how patients learned about the study.
6 weeks
FOOTFIT technology implementation procedures
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Record on study log the number and types of problems encountered with the study nurses teaching participants to use the foot accelerometer technology, the number and types problems reported by patient, the number and types of recommendations made by the participant regarding the use of the accelerometer, and nurse or provider recommendations for changes to refine the foot accelerometer technology, and the number and types of refinements to the technology that were made.
6 weeks
FOOTFIT acceptability
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Record on study logs the the number (frequency) and types of interactions such as phone calls, emails or texts, between the patient and provider regarding FOOTFIT+ including reasons (i.e., exercises, adverse events that are related to, and not related to the use of the accelerometer).
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy on pain
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Obtain estimates of variability for short-term functional impacts on pain using the numerical rating scale (NRS) as a single score.
6 weeks
Efficacy on foot strength
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Obtain estimates of variability for short-term functional impacts on foot strength using the dynamometer and reported as pounds per square inch.
6 weeks
Efficacy on foot range of motion.
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Obtain estimates of variability for short-term functional impacts on foot range of motion using the goniometer and reported in degrees.
6 weeks
Efficacy on walking function.
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Obtain estimates of variability for short-term functional impacts on walking function using the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure and reported as a sum score.
6 weeks
Efficacy on walking performance
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Six Minute Walk Test reported as distance in feet over six minutes time.
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Medical University of South Carolina

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Moby Madisetti, MS, Medical University of South Carolina

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 1, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 14, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 17, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 7, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 5, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Pro00043451

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings