Treatment of Young Adults With Comorbid AUD/MDD: A Pilot Medication Trial (YAAD-P)

March 14, 2017 updated by: Jack Cornelius, University of Pittsburgh
Recent reports have shown that alcohol misuse is a particularly serious problem among the 18 to 25 year old age group. Previous medication trials with SSRI antidepressants among young adults with co-occurring depressive disorders, including our own recent trials with SSRI medications, have produced disappointing results, especially for decreasing the level of alcohol consumption. Mirtazapine is a non-SSRI medication with a unique structure and mechanism of action. Recent study results suggest that mirtazapine is more effective than other antidepressants for treating non-comorbid depression. A few recent studies with mirtazapine have been conducted among subjects with comorbid AUD/MDD, and those studies have demonstrated efficacy for mirtazapine for decreasing the depressive symptoms and the alcohol craving of subjects with comorbid AUD/MDD. However, those studies did not measure level of alcohol consumption, so it is unclear whether mirtazapine decreases the level of alcohol use of that comorbid population. The results of our own very recent open label pilot study suggest robust within-group efficacy for mirtazapine for decreasing both the level of alcohol use and the depressive symptoms of comorbid subjects. However, that pilot study did not include a placebo control group, so the efficacy of mirtazapine versus placebo for decreasing the level of alcohol use among persons with comorbid AUD/MDD remains unclear. This grant submission proposes to conduct a first double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study to provide a preliminary assessment of the efficacy of mirtazapine versus placebo for decreasing both the alcohol use and depressive symptoms of young adults with comorbid AUD/MDD. If results (effect sizes) from the proposed study are found to be promising concerning outcome differences between the mirtazapine and placebo groups, then we will use those findings to apply for an R01 study to definitively assess the efficacy of mirtazapine for treating young adults with AUD/MDD.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

MDD and AUD are each highly prevalent among young adults, and the comorbidity of those two disorders occurs more often than would be expected by chance alone. The presence of this comorbidity is associated with increased risk for motor vehicle accidents, relapse to alcohol use, suicide, recurrence of depressive illness, increased morbidity, and costly hospitalization. Thus, the comorbidity of AUD/MDD is a highly significant public health problem among young adults, with considerable unmet treatment needs. Previous medication trials with SSRI antidepressants involving those co-occurring conditions, including our own recent trials with SSRI medications, have produced disappointing results, especially for decreasing the level of alcohol consumption. Mirtazapine is an FDA-approved medication for treating MDD with a unique pharmacological profile, unrelated to SSRIs. Recent study results suggest that mirtazapine is more effective than other antidepressants for treating non-comorbid depression. A few recent studies have demonstrated efficacy for mirtazapine for decreasing the depressive symptoms and the alcohol craving of subjects with comorbid AUD/MDD, but those studies did not measure level of alcohol consumption. Therefore, it is unclear whether mirtazapine decreases the level of alcohol use of that comorbid population. Our own recent pilot data suggest within-group efficacy for mirtazapine for decreasing both the excessive alcohol use and the depressive symptoms of persons with comorbid AD/MDD. However, that pilot study did not include a placebo control group, so the efficacy of mirtazapine for decreasing the level of alcohol use among persons with comorbid AUD/MDD remains unclear. To date, no double-blind, placebo-controlled study has even been conducted to assess whether mirtazapine decreases both the level of drinking and the depressive symptoms of young adults with comorbid AD/MDD. In this submission, we propose a proof of concept, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial to provide a preliminary assessment of the efficacy of the medication mirtazapine vs. placebo in the treatment of young adults with co-occurring alcohol use disorders (AUD) and major depression (MDD). If results (effect sizes) from the proposed study are found to be promising concerning outcome differences between the mirtazapine and placebo groups, then we will use those findings to apply for an R01 study to definitively assess the efficacy of mirtazapine for treating young adults with AUD/MDD.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
11

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 30 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of current alcohol dependence, confirmed by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)
  • DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of current major depressive disorder, confirmed by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any person who meets criteria for alcohol-induced depression
  • Any psychotic disorder bipolar disorder, mental retardation, impaired cognitive functioning, or use of any psychotropic medication in the previous month
  • Current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV) criteria for dependence on substances other than alcohol, cannabis, nicotine, or caffeine
  • Significant neurological conditions or medical conditions
  • Persistent elevation of liver function enzymes indicating active liver disease (elevated t. bilirubin or elevation to three-time normal range of liver enzymes, SGOT, SGPT, or g-GTP)
  • The presence of renal function impairment defined as serum creatinine >2x upper limit of normal
  • Pregnancy, inability or unwillingness to use contraceptive methods
  • Use of any antidepressant medication in the prior two months, or any lifetime use of mirtazapine
  • Inability to read or understand study forms and agree to informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Mirtazapine
Gelatin capsules mirtazapine 15 mg, 1 capsule every a.m. Medication will be increased by one capsule, to a dose of 2 capsules barring side effects, at Week 2.
Drug: Mirtazapine
Gelatin capsules mirtazapine 15 mg, 1 capsule every a.m. Medication will be increased by one capsule, to a dose of 2 capsules barring side effects, at Week 2.
Other Names:
  • Remeron
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Gelatin capsules Placebo capsules, identical to mirtazapine capsules, 1 capsule every a.m. Medication will be increased by one capsule to 2 capsules at Week 2, barring any side effects.
Drug: Placebo
Gelatin capsules Placebo capsules, identical to mirtazapine capsules, 1 capsule every a.m. Medication will be increased by one capsule to 2 capsules at Week 2, barring any side effects.
Other Names:
  • Sugar Pill

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Drinks Per Drinking Day
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
Level of drinking, as indicated by the number of drinks per day as recorded on the Timeline Follow-Back calendar.
12 Weeks
Level of Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
Level of depressive symptoms, as indicated by the score on the Beck Depression Inventory. The Beck Depression Inventory II scoring range is as follows: 0-13 minimal depressive symptoms, 14-19 mild depressive symptoms, 20-28 moderate depressive symptoms and 29-63 severe depressive symptoms.
12 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Pittsburgh

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jack R Cornelius, M.D., M.P.H., University of Pittsburgh

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 4, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 4, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 5, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 27, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 14, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1R21AA022863-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings