Bronchial Blocker for One-lung Ventilation in Cardiac Surgery
The Use of Bronchial Blocker Versus Double Lumen Tube for One-lung Ventilation During Thoracoscope Assisted Mitral Valve Replacement
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Hailong Dong, MD & PhD
- Phone Number: 86-29-84775337
- Email: hldong6@hotmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Chong Lei, MD & PhD
- Phone Number: 86-29-84775337
- Email: leichongbb@gmail.com
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- New York Heart Association (NYHA)I-III level.
- scheduled for thoracoscope assisted mitral valve surgery under surgery
- provide with informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- emergency surgery.
- preoperative pulmonary diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atelectasis.
- preoperative voice hoarse or sore throat.
- involved in other clinical trials within 3 months .
- Cannot cooperate with language understanding disorders or psychological problems.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: DLT group
In this arm, patient will be intubated with a double lumen endotracheal tube
|
In this arm, after anesthesia induction, a double lumen endotracheal tube will be intubated for one-lung ventilation
|
|
Experimental: BB group
In this arm, patient will be intubated with an endobronchial blocker
|
In this arm, after anesthesia induction, an endobronchial blocker will be intubated for one-lung ventilation
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
clinically relevant laryngeal and bronchial morbidity
Time Frame: perioperative period
|
incidence of clinically relevant laryngeal and bronchial morbidity will be recorded, including postoperative hoarseness, sore throat, and vocal cord injuries, pulmonary complications
|
perioperative period
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Heart Rate
Time Frame: perioperative period
|
Heart rate in BPM will be recorded at right before intubation (T1), at intubation (T2), and at three minutes after intubation (T3).
|
perioperative period
|
|
Central Venous Pressure
Time Frame: perioperative period
|
Central venous pressure in cmH2O will be recorded at right before intubation (T1),at intubation (T2), and at three minutes after intubation (T3).
|
perioperative period
|
|
Blood Pressure
Time Frame: perioperative period
|
Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure all in mmHg will be recorded at right before intubation (T1),at intubation (T2), and at three minutes after intubation (T3).
|
perioperative period
|
|
the Duration of Ventilation
Time Frame: The duration of ventilation in minutes will be recorded at time from intubation to extubation, an expected average of 18 hours.
|
It is the duration of ventilation, prolonged ventilation is defined as patients remaining on the ventilator for more than 48 hours
|
The duration of ventilation in minutes will be recorded at time from intubation to extubation, an expected average of 18 hours.
|
|
Length of Postoperative Hospital Stay
Time Frame: Length of postoperative hospital stay in days will be recorded which is defined as the time from surgery to hospital discharge, an expected average of 10 days
|
Recorded the time of postoperative hospital stay in days.
|
Length of postoperative hospital stay in days will be recorded which is defined as the time from surgery to hospital discharge, an expected average of 10 days
|
|
Length of CCU Stay
Time Frame: Length of CCU stay in hours will be recorded which is defined as the time stay in the cardiac intensive care unit, an expected average of 3 days.
|
It is the length of stay in cardiac ICU
|
Length of CCU stay in hours will be recorded which is defined as the time stay in the cardiac intensive care unit, an expected average of 3 days.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Hailong Dong, MD & PhD, Xijing Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Rothfield KP, Russo SG. Videolaryngoscopy: should it replace direct laryngoscopy? a pro-con debate. J Clin Anesth. 2012 Nov;24(7):593-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2012.04.005.
- Yoo JY, Kim DH, Choi H, Kim K, Chae YJ, Park SY. Disconnection technique with a bronchial blocker for improving lung deflation: a comparison with a double-lumen tube and bronchial blocker without disconnection. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014 Aug;28(4):904-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.07.019. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
- Kuo AS, Philip JH, Edrich T. Airway ventilation pressures during bronchoscopy, bronchial blocker, and double-lumen endotracheal tube use: an in vitro study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014 Aug;28(4):873-9. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.03.023. Epub 2013 Sep 7.
- Guo C, Ma C, Yu L. [Comparative of coopdech bronchial blocker and double-lumen tube on one lung ventilation in children]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Jun 3;94(21):1651-3. Chinese.
- Ruetzler K, Grubhofer G, Schmid W, Papp D, Nabecker S, Hutschala D, Lang G, Hager H. Randomized clinical trial comparing double-lumen tube and EZ-Blocker for single-lung ventilation. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Jun;106(6):896-902. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer086. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
- Lei Q, Zeng QS, Zhang XS, Xie B, Luo ZC, Guo HM, Chen JM, Zhuang J. Superior vena cava drainage during thoracoscopic cardiac surgery: bilateral internal jugular vein sheaths versus one percutaneous superior vena cava cannula. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014 Aug;28(4):914-8. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.05.043. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- KY20153001-1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.