Mindfulness-Based Intervention and Transcranial Direct Current Brain Stimulation to Reduce Heavy Drinking (MBItDCS)

January 21, 2020 updated by: University of New Mexico

Mindfulness-Based Intervention and Transcranial Direct Current Brain Stimulation to Reduce Heavy Drinking: Efficacy and Mechanisms of Change

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) impacts millions of Americans and is associated with significant behavioral, social, economic, medical, and neurobiological dysfunction, yet current behavioral treatments for AUD are only modestly effective. The proposed research will test the efficacy of a novel behavioral intervention, which combines brain stimulation with mindfulness-based relapse prevention, and is hypothesized to improve neural dysfunction and ultimately lead to large effect size reductions in heavy drinking among individuals with AUD. Given that mindfulness and brain stimulation are already available for "home use" there is great potential for the ultimate dissemination of the intervention on a large scale, which could have a significant impact on public health.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Heavy drinking (defined as 4+/5+ drinks per occasion for women/men) and alcohol use disorder (AUD) are a significant public health problem. Modestly effective pharmacological and psychosocial treatments for AUD exist, yet some heavy drinking (i.e., relapse) is the most common outcome following AUD treatment. Continued development of innovative and efficacious interventions that reduce heavy drinking and specifically target risk factors for heavy drinking is thus clearly warranted. One novel intervention that has considerable promise for reducing heavy drinking is mindfulness-based relapse prevention (MBRP). MBRP is a behavioral intervention for substance use disorder that was designed to target experiences of craving and other risk factors for heavy drinking. Based on the results of numerous studies, MBRP is feasible and efficacious in the treatment of AUD. However the effect sizes of MBRP remain small and many individuals struggle with engaging in the mindfulness practices early in treatment. There is preliminary evidence that combining a non-invasive form of brain stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), may improve engagement with mindfulness practices and lead to significant reductions in heavy drinking following treatment. The goal of the proposed study is to examine the efficacy of a mindfulness + tDCS intervention in reducing heavy drinking and impacting hypothesized mechanisms of behavior change among individuals with AUD who are interested in reducing their heavy drinking. In the proposed study, a research team with complementary expertise in AUD treatment, mindfulness-based interventions, brain stimulation, and cognitive neuroscience will combine self-report, behavioral, and neurophysiological data collection via electroencephalography (EEG) to study the psychological and neurophysiological mechanisms of treatment efficacy following a novel, promising intervention that combines brain stimulation with mindfulness training. The mindfulness based intervention in combination with active tDCS is hypothesized to lead to significant reductions in drinks per drinking day after 8 weeks of treatment and these reductions will be maintained up to 2 months following treatment. Further, the effect of active tDCS on drinks per drinking day at the 2 month follow-up will be mediated by greater mindfulness, greater inhibitory control and reductions in craving and negative affect during treatment and at the post-treatment assessment. Approximately 86 individuals meeting criteria for AUD will be randomly assigned to 8 sessions of either MBRP combined with active tDCS (up to 2.0 milliamp current) or MBRP combined with a sham tDCS (no current) control condition. The proposed study will examine the efficacy (Primary Aim) and psychological and neurophysiological mechanisms of treatment efficacy using behavioral measures and EEG (Secondary Aim). In addition to addressing the question of whether adding active tDCS to MBRP enhances efficacy, it will further examine issues of neurophysiological and behavioral treatment mechanisms to better inform the design of a future large efficacy trial.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
84

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87131
        • University of New Mexico Psychology Clinical Neuroscience Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. interested in reducing alcohol drinking
  2. right-handed

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. lifetime diagnosis of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder or current substance use disorder other than nicotine or marijuana
  2. cardiac pacemaker
  3. implantable defibrillator
  4. metal objects in upper body that might interfere with tDCS, or that tDCS may interfere with their function, including metal plates, screws and prosthetics in head, certain older tattoos and permanent makeup using metal containing inks, aneurysm clips, neural stimulators of any kind, ear implants, insulin pumps, drug infusion devices and dental appliances
  5. for females, pregnant or attempting to get pregnant
  6. history of seizures or seizure disorder
  7. allergic to latex, rubber, conductive medium like saline or electrode gel
  8. if assigned to active tDCS and unable to tolerate 1.5 mA of tDCS during a baseline stimulation session

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Active stimulation with mindfulness
Brain stimulation with mindfulness-based relapse prevention. Treatment sessions will be 2 hours for 8 sessions, with the first 30 minutes consisting of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with the current set to 2.0 milliamps (mA) and guided meditation practice.
Device: Brain stimulation with mindfulness-based relapse prevention
Participants will participate in weekly or twice weekly group mindfulness based relapse prevention (MBRP) + transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) intervention sessions for up to eight weeks. All participants will receive 8 two hour sessions of MBRP + tDCS, regardless of the group schedule. Subjects will receive 30 minutes of either active or sham tDCS stimulation, depending on their group assignment. After tDCS, sessions will include discussions of mindfulness as a means of coping with craving, cognitions, and emotions, role play exercises, and mindfulness practice.
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Sham brain stimulation with mindfulness
Brain stimulation with mindfulness-based relapse prevention. Treatment sessions will be 2 hours for 8 sessions, with the first 30 minutes consisting of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with the current set to ramp up to 2.0 milliamps (mA) and then ramp down to 0.0 mA and guided meditation practice.
Device: Brain stimulation with mindfulness-based relapse prevention
Participants will participate in weekly or twice weekly group mindfulness based relapse prevention (MBRP) + transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) intervention sessions for up to eight weeks. All participants will receive 8 two hour sessions of MBRP + tDCS, regardless of the group schedule. Subjects will receive 30 minutes of either active or sham tDCS stimulation, depending on their group assignment. After tDCS, sessions will include discussions of mindfulness as a means of coping with craving, cognitions, and emotions, role play exercises, and mindfulness practice.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Drinks Per Drinking Day
Time Frame: Post-treatment and 2-month follow-up
The Form 90 will be used to derive estimates of the primary outcome: drinks (standard drink=14 grams of pure alcohol) per drinking day.
Post-treatment and 2-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Heavy Drinking Days
Time Frame: Post-treatment and 2-month follow-up
The Form 90 will be used to derive estimates of the secondary outcome: percent heavy drinking days, where heavy drinking is defined as 4+ drinks per occasion for women and 5+ drinks per occasion for men.
Post-treatment and 2-month follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cue Reactivity at the Post-Treatment Assessment
Time Frame: Post-treatment
To measure cue reactivity to alcohol, the investigators will use a visual cue presentation task. Participants will view pictures of alcohol containing beverages and neutral pictures from the International Affective Pictures Series (IAPS)118 and from the web. Alcohol and neutral pictures will be matched for color and complexity as well as other potentially important confounds (e.g., presence of people). The investigators will examine responses to approximately 100 trials each of alcohol pictures and control pictures in a mixed event design (~15 minutes), in order to reduce predictability of the picture type. After viewing pictures participants reported craving for alcohol on a scale from 1 to 9 (1=no craving, 9=extreme craving) with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.
Post-treatment
Reductions in Self-reported Craving
Time Frame: 2 months following treatment
Self-reported craving will be measured using the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (scaled from 0 to 5 with higher scores indicate worse outcome = more craving) with higher scores mean a worse outcome.
2 months following treatment
Improvements in Inhibitory Control
Time Frame: Post-treatment
To examine inhibitory control, the investigators will use a Stop Signal Task in which participants make left-right judgments of the directionality of an arrow presented on the screen. For each trial, a circle will appear for 500 ms, followed by a left or right-pointing arrow for up to 1 second and between 500 ms and 2500 ms jittered inter-trial interval to reduce anticipatory responses. Approximately 25% of trials will be "stop trials" with a tone played to signal participants to inhibit the current response. This timing of the tone is dynamically adjusted to ensure successful inhibition on approximately 50% of trials. There will be 240 trials across 6 blocks (~10 minutes). Inhibitory control is measured by stop signal reaction time.
Post-treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of New Mexico

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 22, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 27, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 27, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 3, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 9, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 10, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 21, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 04316
  • R21AA024926 (NIH)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The investigators will make the data publicly available given that it will be a unique data set that will not only allow for further exploration by alcohol researchers, but also allow for methods development by the broader research community. The investigators plan to release the data to the public once the primary manuscripts describing the main findings of the study have been accepted for publication. Anonymized and preprocessed EEG data as well as deidentified behavioral and questionnaire data will be shared with investigators from institutions with a Federal Wide Assurance; all investigators with whom the data is shared will be included in the annual progress report. To ensure accessibility of the data set, instructions for obtaining the data set will be included in publications of the data collected under this grant.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings