Adherence Intervention for HIV-infected Drug Users

July 22, 2022 updated by: Kasey Claborn, University of Texas at Austin
Many people living with HIV use illicit drugs, which leads to worsened health outcomes and increased transmission of HIV due to poor adherence to medication regimens. This research will develop an intervention targeting medication adherence that is tailored to the unique needs of HIV-infected drug users. This research will promote adherence and improve treatment outcomes among HIV-infected drug users thereby minimizing the development of drug resistant strains of HIV and reducing transmission.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This K23 research and training award advances the long-term goal of improving treatment outcomes and reducing transmission of HIV among HIV-infected drug users. The proposed training and research plans will enable the PI to develop the skills needed for an independent research career in the area of illicit drug use and HIV adherence intervention. The objective of this award is to develop skills in implementation science, behavioral intervention development and evaluation with drug using populations, and in-depth qualitative data analysis to accelerate refinement and effective implementation of interventions for HIV-infected drug users. Multiple comorbidities such as drug use and HIV act synergistically to produce poorer health outcomes and increase morbidity, mortality, and transmission of HIV. Consequently, effective and sustainable interventions adapted to drug users to improve antiretroviral medication adherence and reduce risk behaviors are urgently needed. Drug users present unique treatment challenges compared with other HIV-infected populations, including lower rates of adherence and inferior treatment outcomes. Additionally, interpersonal factors, including social support, negative patient-provider interactions, and socioeconomic challenges present significant barriers to adherence. Thus, the generalizability of current adherence interventions to drug users is limited, and there is a pressing need for efficacious interventions adapted to HIV-infected drug using populations. This project addresses this gap by being the first to adapt and test the acceptability and efficacy of a combined adherence and brief motivational intervention for HIV-infected drug users. Specifically, the intervention will augment the established Life Steps adherence intervention to include: (1) a tailored Life Steps module addressing the unique needs of illicit drug users, aimed at improving medication adherence; (2) a brief Motivational Interview to address drug use and other risk behaviors; and (3) two follow-up booster sessions. A three-phase, top-down research approach to adapt, refine, and pilot test the intervention will be conducted. Phase 1 will include focus groups with HIV-infected drug users currently prescribed antiretroviral medications and individual interviews with community-based clinicians. Phase 2 will include manual development, therapist training, a pilot trial, in-depth qualitative interviews, and further manual revisions. Phase 3 will include a small, 2-armed (intervention vs. health education control) randomized controlled trial with 60 HIV-infected drug users. Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary indication of improvement in antiretroviral adherence and reduction in drug use will be examined at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups. To enable the PI to pursue this long-term research agenda, she will work with experienced mentors to build three areas of expertise: (1) proficiency in qualitative research methods and analysis; (2) skills in intervention development and evaluation with illicit drug using populations; (3) expertise in advanced longitudinal data analysis; and (4) implementation science. This K23 study addresses a key priority in HIV treatment science, and it will fully prepare the PI for an independent research career as an HIV intervention scientist.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
132

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78712
        • Unviersity of Texas Dell Medical School

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • over 18 years of age
  • HIV-infected
  • prescribed an antiretroviral regimen
  • meet DSM-V criteria for a substance use disorder (other than tobacco and alcohol) and report ≥3 days of use of an illicit drug per month over the past 90 days.
  • self-report <100% adherence and have experienced a detectable viral load (>20 copies/mL) within the last 6 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cognitive impairments that jeopardize informed consent
  • active psychosis
  • current suicidal ideation
  • not fluent in English
  • have a prescription for and report only medicinal use of marijuana

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: LifeSteps-Drug Use
The investigators expect the LifeSteps-Drug Use adaptation will be modeled after the Life Steps adherence intervention with the addition of a Drug Use module based on motivational interviewing and the FRAMES approach. The LifeSteps-Drug Use intervention is expected to include two in-person sessions and two telephone booster sessions. While anticipated preliminary adaptations have been based on the extant literature, changes to the protocol will be based on data obtained during the qualitative phase which will be sufficiently broad and open to assess for factors that we have not anticipated.
Behavioral: Life Steps-Drug Use
Active Comparator: Health Education
The health education condition is a time-matched, active control arm. It will consist of two in-person sessions and two telephone sessions. Each session will cover a general health education topic.
Behavioral: General Health Education

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Antiretroviral Adherence
Time Frame: 1-, 3-, and 6-months
Change in Antiretroviral Adherence will be assessed by use of medical event monitoring systems (MEMS). MEMS is a pill-bottle-cap with a pressure activated chip which records time/date the bottle is opened. MEMS data will be collected on one antiretroviral medication following a triage criterion established in studies of antiretroviral adherence.
1-, 3-, and 6-months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Time Frame: 1-, 3-, and 6-months
Change in depression over time will be assessed using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) is a widely used 20-item measure and has good sensitivity and specificity and high internal consistency and has been used extensively with PLWH and is related to ART adherence.
1-, 3-, and 6-months
HIV Treatment Adherence Self-Efficacy (HIV-ASES)
Time Frame: 1-, 3-, and 6-months
Change in treatment self-efficacy will be assessed using the HIV-ASES whic is a 12-item scale of patient confidence in their ability to carry out behaviors related to adhering to medication regimens.
1-, 3-, and 6-months
U.S. Health Resources and Service Administration measure of HIV treatment retention
Time Frame: 1-, 6-months
Change in HIV Treatment Retention will be measured with the U.S. Health Resources and Service Administration measure of HIV treatment retention, which defines treatment retention as having at least two outpatient visits separated by at least 90 days during a 12-month period
1-, 6-months
Risk Assessment Battery
Time Frame: 1-, 3-, and 6-months
Change in HIV risk behavior will be assessed using the Risk Assessment Battery which assesses HIV risk behavior, including sex risk and drug risk, in the past six months.
1-, 3-, and 6-months
HIV1 Ultra RT PCR-Roche test
Time Frame: 1-, 3-, and 6-months
This lab assay will be used to assess change in HIV viral load over time.
1-, 3-, and 6-months
Urine Toxicology Screens
Time Frame: 1-, 3-, and 6-months
Participants will be asked to give a urine sample at each assessment. Redwood Toxicology Redi-cups urine drug screens have test strips in the specimen lids allowing for fast screening without spillage. The Redi-cups 5-panel urine drug screen tests for cocaine, THC, methamphetamines, opiates, and benzodiazepines. This will provide biological verification of drug use to assess change in drug use over time.
1-, 3-, and 6-months
ACTG Self-Reported Antiretroviral Medication Adherence
Time Frame: 1-, 3-, and 6-months
The ACTG scale will be used to assess self-reported adherence to antiretroviral medications.
1-, 3-, and 6-months
30-day Timeline Followback (TLFB)
Time Frame: 1-, 3-, and 6-months
The TLFB will be used to assess change in alcohol, tobacco, and illicit drugs over time.
1-, 3-, and 6-months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Texas at Austin

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Brown University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Kasey Claborn, PhD, The Unviersity of Texas

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 26, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 14, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 20, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 25, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 22, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • K23DA039037 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings