Treatment Algorithm for Nausea and Vomiting in the Palliative Phase

January 9, 2017 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center

Feasibility Study to Compare 2 Strategies of Treatment Algorithm for Treating Nausea and or Vomiting in the Palliative Phase of Cancer Care

Nausea and vomiting are frequently occurring problems in the palliative phase of patients with cancer. Between 20-50% of them regularly suffer from nausea, retching or vomiting. Often the cause of nausea and vomiting is multifactorial and symptomatic treatment is necessary.

Potential drugs for symptomatic anti-nausea therapy are metoclopramide, serotonin antagonists, the combination of both and dexamethasone as rescue medication in case of failure. There is no data that depicts which strategy is the best. This study will be conducted to unravel which treatment algorithm is most successful.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Nausea and vomiting are frequently occurring problems in the palliative phase of patients with cancer. Between 20-50% of them regularly suffer from nausea, retching or vomiting. Often the cause of nausea and vomiting is multifactorial and symptomatic treatment is necessary.

Potential drugs for symptomatic anti-nausea therapy are metoclopramide, serotonin antagonists, the combination of both and dexamethasone as rescue medication in case of failure. There is no data that depicts which strategy is the best. This study will be conducted to unravel which treatment algorithm is most successful: 1 to start with metoclopramide, to add a serotonin antagonist (granisetron transdermal patch and 2 milligram granisetron oral loading dose if the patient can swallow) in case of failure and to add dexamethasone as rescue medication versus 2 an algorithm to start with a serotonin antagonist (granisetron transdermal patch and 2 milligram granisetron oral loading dose if the patient can swallow), to add metoclopramide in case of failure and to add dexamethasone as rescue medication. Granisetron plaster is a new formulation of a well known serotonin antagonist and might be useful especially within the patient group in the palliative phase.

The questions are:

Is it feasible to compare treatment algorithms for symptomatic treatment of nausea and vomiting in palliative cancer patients? And is a stepwise symptomatic treatment algorithm to manage nausea and vomiting using metoclopramide or granisetron transdermal patch as a start medication effective in palliative patients in at least one of both treatment arms? Patients will be asked to complete the QLQC30 and ESAS on different moments during the study. Besides, they will be asked to complete a diary for nausea severity (NRS scale 0-10) and for the frequency of vomiting and retching twice daily.

Success of a treatment algorithm is defined as nausea is < 3 on NRS or a decrease of >2 on NRS for nausea combined with an absence of vomiting or retching in the last 3 days. Incomplete success is defined as nausea of 3 on NRS during one occasion of the last 3 days before the end of study but less than 4, no more than one retching a day during that period and absence of vomiting. Complete failure is defined as nausea of 4 or more on an NRS during the last 3 days or more than one retching daily or any vomiting or in case the patient has stopped all medication due to side effects.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients 18 years or older in the palliative phase and
  • who suffer from nausea or vomiting with a rating on a numeric rating scale (NRS) of more than 2 and
  • have a wish to be treated and
  • where no treatable cause is assignable

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients not able to sign informed consent.
  • Patients with known contra-indications for metoclopramide, 5HT-3 antagonists or dexamethasone.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: algorithm 1 first metoclopramide
metoclopramide 10 mg tablets 3x daily orally and in those patients that cannot swallow tablets the medication will be substituted by suppositories 10 mg 3x daily rectally. In case of failure, granisetron patch 3.1mg/24 hours will be added to the treatment and a loading dose of 2 mg granisetron oral if the patient can swallow. In case of toxicity metoclopramide will be stopped. In case of failure of the combination (second step) or toxicity, an oral dose of dexamethasone 8 mg will be added daily.
Drug: metoclopramide
metoclopramide 10 mg tablets 3x daily orally or suppositories 10 mg 3x daily rectally, use until toxicity
Drug: granisetron
granisetron patch 3.1mg/24 hours, use until toxicity
Other Names:
  • Sancuso
Drug: Dexamethasone
dexamethasone 8 mg, last step in both algorithms
Drug: Granisetron 2Mg Tablet
granisetron 2 mg loading dose
Active Comparator: algorithm 2 first granisetron

granisetron patch 3.1 mg/24 hours will be offered to the patient, and a loading dose of 2 mg granisetron oral if the patient can swallow In case of failure, metoclopramide 10 mg tablets 3x daily orally will be added and in those patients that cannot swallow tablets the oral medication will be substituted with rectal suppositories 10 mg. The granisetron patch will only be withdrawn from patients that suffer from clinically relevant toxicity. Metoclopramide will then be administered.

In the case of secondary failure or toxicity, dexamethasone 8 mg orally daily will be added.
Drug: metoclopramide
metoclopramide 10 mg tablets 3x daily orally or suppositories 10 mg 3x daily rectally, use until toxicity
Drug: granisetron
granisetron patch 3.1mg/24 hours, use until toxicity
Other Names:
  • Sancuso
Drug: Dexamethasone
dexamethasone 8 mg, last step in both algorithms
Drug: Granisetron 2Mg Tablet
granisetron 2 mg loading dose

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NRS nausea
Time Frame: 15 days
response defined as NRS <3 or decrease of more than 2 on NRS and absence of vomiting or retching in the last 3 days
15 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
days from T0 to control
Time Frame: two weeks
The time from T0 until the moment that nausea and vomiting/retching is in control
two weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
feasibility
Time Frame: 6 months
number of included patients a 6 months period
6 months
comparison of starting metoclopramide to starting with granisetron
Time Frame: 6 months
response defined as NRS <3 or decrease of more than 2 on NRS and absence of vomiting or retching in the last 3 days
6 months
quality of life
Time Frame: 15 days
QLQC30 scale
15 days
adverse events
Time Frame: 14/15 days
diary adverse events
14/15 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Radboud University Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: C.A.H.H.V.M. Verhagen, M.D. Ph.D., Radboud University Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 21, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 9, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 11, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 9, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CVS01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on metoclopramide

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings