Effects of tDCS on Cognitive Control and Emotion Regulation in Depressed Patients

January 30, 2017 updated by: University Hospital Tuebingen

The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Cognitive Control and Emotion Regulation in Depressed Patients

Deficient cognitive control (CC) and the use of dysfunctional emotion regulation strategies (ERS) are both central characteristics of major depression. Both are associated with reduced activity of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a safe, simple and effective non-invasive method to modulate the cortical excitability. The goal of this randomized, sham-controlled, double blind clinical trial is to examine the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the CC and ERS in depressed patients compared to healthy subjects. Overall, the study will include 44 participants (22 depressed Patients and 22 healthy subjects). Each participant will complete a CC task while receiving sham tDCS in one session and anodal tDCS in the other session (counterbalanced). Afterwards the ERS 'rumination' will be measured during a resting phase by means of a questionnaire and psychophysiological measures (heart rate variability). The investigators hypothesize (a) an amelioration of CC by anodal tDCS and (b) a reduced use of the dysfunctional emotion regulation strategy 'rumination' after anodal tDCS. Overall this experiment will provide new and reliable data for the development of new treatment methods.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

  1. Working hypothesis: anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) can enhance healthy and impaired cognitive control (CC) and reduce the use of dysfunctional emotion regulation strategies.
  2. Previous work of the investigators: The investigators previous work has provided decisive evidence for polarity-specific activity-dependent effects of tDCS to the left dlPFC on cognitive planning and control of emotional information processing in healthy subjects and patients with MD. Particularly, reduced prefrontal brain activity during a working memory task in patients with MD was found by using near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). In addition, the investigators demonstrated that a single session, anodal, activity enhancing tDCS to the left dlPFC ameliorates deficient CC in patients with depression, whereas cathodal, activity reducing tDCS, induces a depression-like negativity bias in healthy subjects. Furthermore, the investigators showed that during anodal tDCS of the left dlPFC healthy subjects showed (a) better performance in a CC task (b) no increase in angry mood after the task compared to a control group and (c) that elevated angry mood was associated to a worse performance in the CC task.
  3. Aims and workplan: to investigate the effects of anodal tDCS of the left dLPFC in healthy and depressed subjects the investigators will conduct a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, cross-over design. In two sessions each participant (22 depressed and 22 healthy subjects, N= 44) will complete a CC task while receiving anodal tDCS (1 mA) to the left dlPFC in one session and sham tDCS in the other session (counterbalanced). Afterwards the ERS 'rumination' will be measured during a resting phase by means of a questionnaire and psychophysiological measures.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
44

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
    • Baden-Württemberg
      • Tubingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, 72076
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital Tuebingen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria for depressed patients

  • diagnosed major depression (DSM-V)
  • stable medication for four weeks

Inclusion Criteria for all participants

  • right handedness

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of seizures
  • metal device throughout the body
  • pregnancy
  • use of von antipsychotics / mood stabilizer
  • diagnosed bipolar disorder
  • current substance abuse (nicotine excluded)
  • diagnosed psychotic diseases
  • diagnosed anorexia nervosa
  • diagnosed personality disorders: cluster A, antisocial personality disorder, borderline personality disorder

Exclusion Criteria for healthy participants:

  • history of affective disorders or current affective disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: anodal tDCS
transcranial direct current stimulation of the left dlPFC with 1mA
Device: anodal transcranial direct current stimulation
Other Names:
  • anodal tDCS
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Sham stimulation
Double blind sham stimulation (stimulation will be ramped down after 30 sec.)
Device: transcranial direct current stimulation (sham)
for the placebo control condition, the transcranial direct current stimulation will only last for 30 seconds and will then be ramped down.
Other Names:
  • sham tDCS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Interstimulusintervall and number of correct trials in the PASAT
Time Frame: Assessment during stimulation/ sham stimulation in two sessions through study completion, on average 10 days.
To measure the performance in the PASAT the number of correct trials as well as the mean Interstimulusintervall will be assessed.
Assessment during stimulation/ sham stimulation in two sessions through study completion, on average 10 days.
Change of positive and negative affect
Time Frame: The positive and negative affect is assessed (a) right before and after the PASAT in two sessions through study completion, on average 10 days. And (b) also after the resting phase in two sessions through study completion, on average 10 days.
Change of positive and negative affect after, compared to before performing the PASAT and also change of the affect during the resting phase.
The positive and negative affect is assessed (a) right before and after the PASAT in two sessions through study completion, on average 10 days. And (b) also after the resting phase in two sessions through study completion, on average 10 days.
Heart rate variability
Time Frame: in two sessions through study completion, on average 10 days
The Heart Rate Variability will be measured during the resting phase right after the measurement of the affect.
in two sessions through study completion, on average 10 days
Score in state rumination questionnaire
Time Frame: in two sessions through study completion, on average 10 days
The state rumination will be measured after the resting phase
in two sessions through study completion, on average 10 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital Tuebingen

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Universität Tübingen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2017

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 28, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 30, 2017

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 1, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 1, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 30, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 01EE1403D

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings