Effects Of Adjuvants to Caudal Anesthesia on Hemodynamics Measured By Electrical Cardiometry In Children
Effects Of Adjuvants (Dexamethasone and Dexmedetomidine) to Caudal Anesthesia on Cardiac Output and Hemodynamics Measured By Electrical Cardiometry In Children: A Randomized Double Blind Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Participants will be randomly allocated by a computer-generated table into one of the 3 study groups; the randomization sequence was concealed in sealed envelopes. The three study groups were as follows:
Group A: Caudal Dexmedetomidine block group (DEXM) (n= 16) will receive caudal block using the bupivacaine 0.25% and Dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg with the conventional general anesthesia,
Group B: caudal Dexamethasone Block group (DEXA) (n =16) will receive caudal block using the bupivacaine 0.25% and Dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg with the conventional general anesthesia,
Group C: caudal with bubivacaine (CONTROL) group (n = 16) will receive caudal block using the bupivacaine 0.25% and general anesthesia.
After induction of general anesthesia, the electrodes of the electrical cardiometry will be applied on the child neck and chest in the supine position and a measurement for the baseline cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance and stroke volume will be taken using the electrical cardiometry. Baseline blood pressure and heart rate will be also recorded.Then, another measurement for the systemic cardiac output, vascular resistance, stroke volume heart rate and blood pressure will be taken at 5minutes, 10 minutes, 20 minutes and 30 minutes after caudal block. The measurements will be stored and analyzed off-line.
The Electrical Cardiometry device that will be used is the ICON™ monitor; (the Portable Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitor manufactured by Osypka Medical Company). The measurements will be stored and analyzed off-line. The average values during three consecutive measures will be considered for the analysis.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pediatric patients 1 - 7 years.
- Both genders (male & female).
- ASA I & ASA II patients.
- Children scheduled for lower abdominal elective surgeries including genitourinary and perineal regions surgeries.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Parents' refusal of regional block.
- Patients requiring emergency procedures.
- Bleeding disorders.
- Skin lesions or wounds at site of proposed needle insertion.
- Cutaneous anomalies (angioma, hair tuft, nevus or a dimple) near the puncture point requiring radiological examination (ultrasound, CT or MRI).
- Progressive neurological disorders.
- Patients with congenital heart disease.
- Patients with Allergies to used drugs
- Surgeries with large fluid shift or massive blood loss.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: QUADRUPLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Caudal block with dexmedetomedine
Caudal Dexmedetomidine block group (DEXM) (n= 16) will receive caudal block using the bupivacaine 0.25% and Dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg with the conventional general anesthesia,
|
After induction, the electrical cardiometry is applied in supine position and a measurement for the baseline cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance and stroke volume is taken.
In left lateral position, the back is sterilized.
The block is done by introducing a 23-gauge needle perpendicular to the sacrococcygeal membrane.
The needle is inserted until there is release of resistance as it pierces the sacro-coccygeal membrane.
Then, it is directed upwards to make an angle of 20-30° with the skin about 2 mm. 1 ml/kg bupivacaine 0.25% along with dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg (diluted with normal saline to 1ml) is injected over about 60s.
Then, another measurement for the hemodynamics is taken at 5, 10, 20 and 30 minutes after caudal block.
Other Names:
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Caudal block with dexamethasone
caudal Dexamethasone Block group (DEXA) (n =16) will receive caudal block using the bupivacaine 0.25% and Dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg with the conventional general anesthesia,
|
After induction, the electrical cardiometry is applied in supine position and a measurement for the baseline cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance and stroke volume is taken.
In left lateral position, the back is sterilized.
The block is done by introducing a 23-gauge needle perpendicular to the sacrococcygeal membrane.
The needle is inserted until there is release of resistance as it pierces the sacro-coccygeal membrane.
Then, it is directed upwards to make an angle of 20-30° with the skin about 2 mm. 1 ml/kg bupivacaine 0.25% along with dexamethasone 0.1mg/kg (diluted with normal saline to 1ml) is injected over about 60s.
Then, another measurement for the hemodynamics is taken at 5, 10, 20 and 30 minutes after caudal block.
Other Names:
|
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Control (caudal block with bupivacaine)
caudal with bubivacaine (CONTROL) group (n = 16) will receive caudal block using the bupivacaine 0.25% and general anesthesia.
|
After induction, the electrical cardiometry is applied in supine position and a measurement for the baseline cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance and stroke volume is taken.
In left lateral position, the back is sterilized.
The block is done by introducing a 23-gauge hypodermic needle perpendicular to the sacrococcygeal membrane.
The needle is inserted until there is release of resistance as it pierces the sacro-coccygeal membrane.
Then, it is directed upwards to make an angle of 20-30° with the skin about 2 mm. 1 ml/kg the control (bupivacaine) 0.25% is injected over about 60s.
Then, another measurement for the hemodynamics is taken at 5, 10, 20 and 30 minutes after caudal block.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Cardiac output
Time Frame: up to 30 minutes
|
Cardiac output at 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 20 minutes and 30 minutes after caudal block,the cardiac output is measured with L/minute
|
up to 30 minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Nevine M Gouda, professor, Kasr El Aini Hospitals-Cairo university-Egypt
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- 1) Shah N., Patel J., Chhaya A. and Upadhyaya R. Comparison of general anesthesia v/s caudal epidural in pediatric infra umbilical surgeries. International J of Biomed Res. 2015; 6(01): 35- 9.
- 2) Almajali Z., Batarseh E., Daameh S., Qabha A. and Haddadin M. Comparison of Postoperative Pain Relief Impact between Caudal Bupivacaine Alone and Caudal Bupivacaine-Dexamethasone Mixture Administration for Pediatric Local Tube Urethroplasty. J of The R Med Serv. 2014; 21(4): 19-24.
- 3) Butterworth J., Mackey,D. & Wasnick,J. Morgan & Mikhail's Clinical Anesthesiology. 5th ed. the United States: McGraw-Hill Education, LLC. 2013; 877-905.
- Farrag WS, Ibrahim AS, Mostafa MG, Kurkar A, Elderwy AA. Ketamine versus magnesium sulfate with caudal bupivacaine block in pediatric inguinoscrotal surgery: A prospective randomized observer-blinded study. Urol Ann. 2015 Jul-Sep;7(3):325-9. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.152039.
- 5) Bhaskar D. , Kumar P. , Mridul S. , Vipin D. , Vivek T. and Mohamed A. Comparison Of Caudal Dexmedetomidine And Fentanyl For Postoperative Analgesia. J of Adv Res in Bio Scien. 2014; 6 (1) 51-7.
- 6) El Gendy H.A. & Elsharnouby N.M. Ultrasound Guided Single Injection Caudal Epidural Anesthesia Of Isobaric Bupivacaine With/Without Dexamethasone For Geriatric Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement Surgery. Egyptian Journal of Anesthesia. 2014; 30: 293- 8.
- Deng M, Wang X, Wang L, Zheng S. The hemodynamic effects of newborn caudal anesthesia assessed by transthoracic echocardiography: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Nov;18(11):1075-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02786.x.
- Galante D, Pellico G, Meola S, Caso A, De Capraris A, Milillo R, Mirabile C, Olivieri M, Cinnella G, Dambrosio M. Hemodynamic effects of levobupivacaine after pediatric caudal anesthesia evaluated by transesophageal doppler. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Nov;18(11):1066-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02774.x.
- Larousse E, Asehnoune K, Dartayet B, Albaladejo P, Dubousset AM, Gauthier F, Benhamou D. The hemodynamic effects of pediatric caudal anesthesia assessed by esophageal Doppler. Anesth Analg. 2002 May;94(5):1165-8, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200205000-00020.
- 10) Rajput RS, Das S., Chauhan S., Bisoi AK. & Vasdev S. Comparison of Cardiac Output Measurement by Noninvasive Method with Electrical Cardiometry and Invasive Method with Thermodilution Technique in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Wor J Cardiovas S. 2014 ;(4): 123-130.
- Xiang Q, Huang DY, Zhao YL, Wang GH, Liu YX, Zhong L, Luo T. Caudal dexmedetomidine combined with bupivacaine inhibit the response to hernial sac traction in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Mar;110(3):420-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes385. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
- Mason KP, Lerman J. Review article: Dexmedetomidine in children: current knowledge and future applications. Anesth Analg. 2011 Nov;113(5):1129-42. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822b8629. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
- 13) Almajali Z., Batarseh E., Daameh S., Qabha A., Haddadin M. Comparison Of Postoperative Pain Relief Impact Between Caudal Bupivacaine Alone And Caudal Bupivacaine-Dexamethasone Mixture Administration For Pediatric Local Tube Urethroplasty. J Roy Med Serv. 2014; 21(4): 19-24.
- 14) Dalal S., Paul A. and Tirpude NG. Clinical Evaluation of Caudal Clonidine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Sub Umbilical Surgeries. Research Chronicle in health sciences. 2015; 1(2): 110-121.
- 15) Alsadek W., Al-Gohari M., Elsonbaty M., Nassar N.& Alkonaiesy R. Ultrasound Guided TAP Block Versus Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block For Pain Relief In Children Undergoing Lower Abdominal Surgeries. Egyp J of Anaesth. 2015; (31): 155-160.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Autonomic Agents
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Sensory System Agents
- Anesthetics
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Antiemetics
- Gastrointestinal Agents
- Glucocorticoids
- Hormones
- Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists
- Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal
- Anesthetics, Local
- Dexamethasone
- Bupivacaine
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- N6-2016/MD
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Caudal Block
-
NCT07281235CompletedChildren | Erector Spinae Plane Block | Caudal Block | Caudal Block for Postoperative Analgesia | Caudal Anesthesia | Local Analgesia Via Infiltration | Caudal Epidural Anesthesia
-
NCT04712370UnknownConventional Caudal Block | Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block | Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block | Pediatric Hip Surgery
-
NCT06981780Completed
-
NCT04039295Completed
-
NCT05504590CompletedCaudal Epidural Block
-
NCT04415905CompletedCaudal Block for Postoperative Analgesia
-
NCT06846983RecruitingCaudal Block | Peripheral Perfusion Index
-
NCT07200765Active, not recruitingCoccygodynia | Coccydynia | Caudal Epidural Block
Clinical Trials on Caudal block with dexmedetomedine
-
NCT06667947CompletedComplication of Anesthesia
-
NCT07199816Active, not recruitingPain Management After Surgery
-
NCT06187714CompletedCaudal Block | Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter
-
NCT07235475CompletedPost Operative Pain, Acute
-
NCT05012215RecruitingKidney Stones | Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
-
NCT07088900Recruiting
-
NCT07619651RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Hypospadias
-
NCT07197203Not yet recruiting
-
NCT07147062RecruitingPain Management | Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing
-
NCT05896072RecruitingInguinal Hernia | Post Operative Pain