Effect of Pulpotomy Using TheraCal Versus MTA on Survival Rate of Cariously-Exposed Vital Permanent Molars

July 21, 2017 updated by: Passant Nagy, Cairo University

The Effect of Pulpotomy (Partial or Complete) Using Resin-Modified Calcium Silicate Versus MTA-Anglus on Survival Rate of Cariously-Exposed Vital Young Permanent Molars:A Randomized Clinical Trial

Objective:

To assess which is the most efficient pulpotomy medicament on tooth survival in patients with a cariously-exposed vital young permanent molar regarding: absence of postoperative pain, sinus or swelling, internal/ external root resorption, periapical radiolucency), root maturation and decrease chair side time of treated patient.

Trial design Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT), double-blinded with parallel group and allocation ratio (1:1), equivalence framework.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Preoperative records will be taken (photos, conventional periapical radiographs, and impression to construct acrylic stent to help standardization on follow up apical radiographs). Administration of inferior alveolar nerve block then using rubber dam isolation one of the investigators will remove the caries using large round but under copious amount of coolant and if carious exposure occur, part of the pulp chamber will be removed using sharp spoon excavator. Then the pulp status will be assessed if bleeding is controlled with direct irrigation with distilled water for 2 minutes then next step will be taken but if not continue excavation of the pulp till bleeding is controlled. if bleeding is not controlled after performing complete pulpotomy, tooth will be excluded from the study Then direct application of capping materials (TheraCal or MTA) according to manufacturer instructions, then Riva self-cure glass-ionomer base and composite resin final restoration. One of the investigators will take immediate standardized postoperative periapical radiographs. Follow-up will be for 12 months. Pre-calibrated blinded dentists will assess out comes separately.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
22

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 9 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Restorable permanent molars with deep caries and pain could be relieved with analgesics

Exclusion Criteria:

  • criteria of exclusion of teeth were:

    • pathological mobility, swelling or tenderness to percussion/palpation;
    • pathology is shown in the pre-operative radiographic as resorption periradicular or furcation radiolucency, or a widened periodontal ligament space;
    • at the operative procedure, hemorrhage control is unachievable

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: TheraCal vital pulp therapy
Using rubber dam isolation we will remove the caries using large round but under copious amount of coolant and if carious exposure occur, part of the pulp chamber will be removed using sharp spoon excavator. After complete removal of the caries and control of bleeding, then direct application of incremental layers of TheraCal using the tip of the syringe container of the material and each layer should not exceed 1 mm then light curing each increment. Then Riva self-cure glass-ionomer base and composite resin final restoration. We will take immediate standardized postoperative periapical radiographs.
Drug: TheraCal
TheraCal directly applied from the syringe container tip to pulp stump over incremental layers each layer should not exceed 1 mm thickness and each layer will be light cured for 20 sec.
Other Names:
  • TheraCal vital pulp therapy
Active Comparator: MTA vital pulp therapy
Using rubber dam isolation we will remove the caries using large round but under copious amount of coolant and if carious exposure occur, part of the pulp chamber will be removed using sharp spoon excavator. After complete removal of the caries and control of bleeding, then direct application of freshly mixed MTA-Anglus on sterile glass slap. MTA application then gentle condensation over wet cotton till MTA thickness is about 2-3 mm thickness and removal of excess material from walls of pulp chamber. Application of wet cotton for 15 min. to achieve initial setting of MTA. Then Riva self-cure glass-ionomer base and composite resin final restoration. We will take immediate standardized postoperative periapical radiographs.
Drug: MTA-Anglus
MTA-Anglus freshly mixed according to manufacturer instructions over glass slap and applied to pulp stump and application of wet cotton for 15 min. till initial setting occur.
Other Names:
  • MTA-Anglus vital pulp therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Survival rate
Time Frame: 12 months
absence of any complication or complementary treatment (absence of spontaneous pain or swelling)
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
periapical radiolucency
Time Frame: 12 months
presence or absence of periapical radiolucency radiographically
12 months
internal/ external root resorption
Time Frame: 12 months
presence or absence of internal/ external root resorption radiographically
12 months
Root maturation
Time Frame: 12 months
Root maturation assessment radiographically
12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time lapse till final restoration performed
Time Frame: from 5 till 20 minutes
measured using stop watch to assess which material needs less chair side time to be finished.
from 5 till 20 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cairo University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Passant Nagi, MSc, Assisternt lecturer

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 30, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 11, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 14, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 19, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 25, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 21, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CEBD-CU-2014-09-15

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Caries, Dental

Clinical Trials on TheraCal

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings