Effect of PEEP on Lung Recruitment and Homogeneity Over Time in Moderate to Severe ARDS (APRV)

August 15, 2022 updated by: Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

Estimation of Long Term PEEP Effect on Lung Homogeneity and Recruitment Using APRV Ventilation:Measurement of End Expiratory Lung Volume With Nitrogen Wash-out/wash-in Technique and End Expiratory Lung Impedance With EIT at Different Times.

This study evaluates the effect of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) on lung homogeneity and recruitment in patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

It will do this by comparing the homogeneity of ventilation and recruitment prior to a patient being ventilated on APRV, and at 30, 60 and 120 minutes after starting APRV.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) is a well-recognised problem of ventilation in patients with ARDS, and is currently treated with lung-protective ventilation, which limits tidal volumes and airway pressures by applying higher levels of positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP). However, it is not known whether higher levels of PEEP increases recruitment and homogeneity of ventilation within the lungs.

APRV is a mode of inverse ventilation, where high levels of PEEP are maintained with brief releases of pressure, and has been proposed as an appropriate method of ventilation in patients with ARDS.

This study will assess homogeneity of ventilation and recruitment in 15 patients before APRV is started, and 30, 60 and 120 mins after commencing APRV. It will do this using Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT), nitrogen wash in/wash out technique, and lung strain.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
      • London, United Kingdom, SE1 7EH
        • Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All Patients admitted to ICU ventilated with moderate or severe ARDS, based on the Berlin definition of ARDS.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years and < 80 years

    • Weight > 35 Kg and BMI < 40
    • Informed consent according to local regulations
    • Hemoglobin ≥ 70 g/dl
    • Haemodynamically stable > 4 hours
    • Moderate to severe ARDS (PaO2/FIO2 < 26.6 kPa with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) > 5 cmH2O) as per Berlin definition of ARDS

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Expected survival < 72 hours

    • Suspected pregnancy (negative pregnancy test required for women of child-bearing potential)
    • Open abdomen
    • Documented or suspected raised intracranial pressure
    • Active air leak (pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, subcutaneous emphysema)
    • Morbid obesity BMI > 40
    • Recent < 1 week cardiac or thoracic surgery
    • Unstable thorax and sternum with paradoxical chest wall movement
    • Severe Chronic Respiratory Disease (COPD) - GOLD 3 or 4 emphysema with bullae
    • Severe smoking (> 40 pack-year history)
    • Liver Failure: Child-Pugh Class C
    • Massive ascites
    • Lung fibrosis
    • Severe cardiac disease (one of the following): New York Heart Association Class III or IV, acute coronary syndrome or persistent ventricular tachyarrhythmias
    • Sickle cell disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To compare lung homogeneity estimated with EIT upon commencing APRV (APRVpre) and after 30 - 60 - 120 min of APRV ventilation (APRV30, APRV60, APRV120) in patients with moderate to severe ARDS
Time Frame: 30, 60 and 120 mins
EIT will be measured at time APRVpre during a "low-flow maneuver" consisting of a brief switch to PC ventilation: with a flow of 4 L/min, airway pressure will be gradually increased up to 30 cmH20 in order to see how the lung changes elastically minimising resistance. EIT will also be measured after 30 min (time APRV30), 60 min (time APRV60), 120 min (time APRV120) since APRV has started.
30, 60 and 120 mins

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess recruitment at the beginning and after the end of APRV ventilation in patients with moderate-severe ARDS.
Time Frame: 2 hours
To assess recruitment measuring change in end expiratory lung impedance (EELI) with EIT technique, and EELV with nitrogen wash-out/wash-in technique.
2 hours
To compare lung strain measured at APRVpre and after the end of APRV ventilation (APRVpost) in patients with moderate-severe ARDS
Time Frame: 2 hours
Strain will be calculated at time APRVpre using the strain formula (TV/EELV)
2 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Luigi Camporota, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 2, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 2, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 4, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 17, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 15, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 123456789 (Bandirma Onyedi Eylul University)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

All shared data will be as a mean and not as individual

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Illness

Clinical Trials on APRV

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings