Effects of a Provision of a Cane After Stroke

March 24, 2020 updated by: Luci Fuscaldi Teixeira-Salmela, Federal University of Minas Gerais

Effects of a Provision of a Cane on Locomotion and Social Participation of Individuals With Stroke: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Previous studies failed to determine the real effects of the provision of a walking cane after a stroke, mainly due to biases related to their methodological designs. In addition, there is no information on the carry-over effects of a cane to social participation. This study will test the hypothesis that the provision of a cane is effective in improving walking speed, step length, cadence, walking capacity, walking confidence, and participation of individuals with chronic stroke. For this prospective, single-blinded, randomized clinical trial, people after stroke will be randomly allocated into either experimental or control groups. The experimental group will receive a single-point cane, with ergonomic handgrip, which will be individually adjusted to the participant's height. A physiotherapist will provide instructions on how to walk with the cane and the participants will practice for about 15 minutes or until they feel comfortable with the device. Then, they will take the cane home and will be instructed to use it all the time during locomotion. Weekly, they will receive a phone call, to ensure that they are using the cane and to clarify any doubts. A home visit may be conducted, if necessary. The control group will be instructed to perform stretching of the lower limb muscles daily and keep their daily activities, without the use of a cane. To ensure the level of attention similar to that of the participants in the experimental group, the individuals in the control group will also receive weekly phone calls. At baseline (Week 0), post intervention (Week 4), and one month after the cessation (Week 8) of the interventions, researchers blinded to group allocations will collect all outcome measures.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Rationale: Motor impairments after a stroke are disabling and interfere with the performance of daily activities, such as locomotion. Walking devices, such as a single cane, are usually prescribed to increase safety and improve gait ability. Previous studies failed to determine the real effects of the provision of a walking cane after a stroke, mainly due to biases related to their methodological designs. In addition, there is no information on the carry-over effects of a cane to social participation.

Aim: This study will test the hypothesis that the provision of a cane is effective in improving walking speed, step length, cadence, walking capacity, walking confidence, and participation of individuals with chronic stroke.

Design: For this prospective, single-blinded, randomized clinical trial, people after stroke will be randomly allocated into either experimental or control groups. The experimental group will receive a single-point cane, with ergonomic handgrip, which will be individually adjusted to the participant's height. A physiotherapist will provide instructions on how to walk with the cane and the participants will practice for about 15 minutes or until they feel comfortable with the device. Then, they will take the cane home and will be instructed to use it all the time during locomotion. Weekly, they will receive a phone call, to ensure that they are using the cane and to clarify any doubts. A home visit may be conducted, if necessary.

The control group will be instructed to perform stretching of the lower limb muscles daily and keep their daily activities, without the use of a cane. To ensure the level of attention similar to that of the participants in the experimental group, the individuals in the control group will also receive weekly phone calls. At baseline (Week 0), post intervention (Week 4), and one month after the cessation (Week 8) of the interventions, researchers blinded to group allocations will collect all outcome measures.

Study outcomes: walking speed, step length, cadence, walking capacity, walking confidence, and participation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • MG
      • Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, 31270-901
        • Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
      • Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, 31270-901
        • NeuroGroup Laboratory

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • People with stroke will be eligible if they are >6 months after the onset of their first stroke,
  • >20 years of age,
  • Able to walk at least 14 meters, independently, walk with a speed ≤0.8 m/s or less, and
  • Are naïve to use any assistive device.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with cognitive impairments, double hemiparesis, or any other non-stroke related conditions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Provision of a cane
The experimental group will receive a single-point cane, with ergonomic handgrip, which will be individually adjusted to the participant's height. A physiotherapist will provide instructions on how to walk with the cane and the participants will practice for about 15 minutes or until they feel comfortable with the device. Then, they will take the cane home and will be instructed to use it all the time during locomotion. Weekly, they will receive a phone call, to ensure that they are using the cane and to clarify any doubts. A home visit may be conducted, if necessary.
The participants will receive a single-point cane and will be instructed to use it all the time during locomotion. Weekly, they will receive a phone call, to ensure that they are using the cane and to clarify any doubts. A home visit may be conducted, if necessary.
Other: Control
The control group will be instructed to to perform stretching of the lower limb muscles daily and keep their daily activities, without the use of a cane. They will also receive weekly phone calls, to ensure similar level of attention to that of the the participants in the experimental group.
The control group will be instructed to to perform stretching of the lower limb muscles daily and keep their daily activities, without the use of a cane. They will also receive weekly phone calls, to ensure similar level of attention to that of the the participants in the experimental group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Walking speed
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), after intervention (week 4) and one-month follow-up (week 8)
Changes in walking speed, in m/s, assessed by the 10-m Walk Test.
Baseline (week 0), after intervention (week 4) and one-month follow-up (week 8)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Walking step length
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), after intervention (week 4) and one-month follow-up (week 8)
Changes in walking step length, in meters, assessed by the 10-m Walk Test.
Baseline (week 0), after intervention (week 4) and one-month follow-up (week 8)
Walking cadence
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), after intervention (week 4) and one-month follow-up (week 8)
Changes in walking cadence, in step/minutes, assessed by the 10-m Walk Test.
Baseline (week 0), after intervention (week 4) and one-month follow-up (week 8)
Walking capacity
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), after intervention (week 4) and one-month follow-up (week 8)
Changes in walking capacity, in meters, assessed by the 6-min Walk Test.
Baseline (week 0), after intervention (week 4) and one-month follow-up (week 8)
Walking confidence
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), after intervention (week 4) and one-month follow-up (week 8)
Changes in walking confidence, reported as scores ranging from 10 to 100, assessed by the Modified Gait Efficacy Scale.
Baseline (week 0), after intervention (week 4) and one-month follow-up (week 8)
Social Participation
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), after intervention (week 4) and one-month follow-up (week 8)
Changes in social Participation, assessed by the Stroke Impact Scale (social participation sub-section).
Baseline (week 0), after intervention (week 4) and one-month follow-up (week 8)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Luci F Teixeira-Salmela, Ph.D., Federal University of Minas Gerais

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FAPEMIG

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Provision of a cane

Search Similar Trials