Neural and Kinematic Features of Freezing of Gait for Adaptive Neurostimulation

November 5, 2019 updated by: Helen M. Bronte-Stewart, Stanford University
Continuous deep brain stimulation (cDBS) is an established therapy for the major motor signs in Parkinson's disease, however some patients find that it does not adequately treat their freezing of gait (FOG). Currently, cDBS is limited to "open-loop" stimulation,without real-time adjustment to the patient's state of activity, fluctuations and types of motor symptoms, medication dosages, or neural markers of the disease. The purpose of this study is to determine if an adaptive DBS system,responding to patient specific, clinically relevant neural or kinematic feedback related to FOG, is more effective than continuous DBS on the motor Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS III) and gait measures of PD.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
12

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
        • Stanford Movement Disorders

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. A diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease, with bilateral symptoms at Hoehn and Yahr Stage greater than or equal to II.
  2. Documented improvement in motor signs on versus off dopaminergic medication, with a change in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor (UPDRS III) score of >= 30% off to on medication.
  3. The presence of complications of medication such as wearing off signs,fluctuating responses and/or dyskinesias, and/or medication refractory tremor,and/or impairment in the quality of life on or off medication due to these factors.
  4. Subjects should be on stable doses of medications, which should remain unchanged until the DBS system is activated. After the DBS system is optimized(during which time the overall medication dose may be reduced to avoid discomfort and complications such as dyskinesias) the medication dose should remain unchanged, if possible, for the duration of the study.
  5. Treatment with carbidopa/levodopa, and with a dopamine agonist at the maximal tolerated doses as determined by a movement disorders neurologist.
  6. Ability and willingness to return for study visits, at the initial programming and after three, six and twelve months of DBS.
  7. Age > 18
  8. Has a history of and/or displays freezing of gait

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects with significant cognitive impairment and/or dementia as determined bya standardized neuropsychological battery.
  2. Subjects with clinically active depression, defined according to the Diagnostic and Statistical manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria and as scored on a validated depression assessment scale.
  3. Subjects with very advanced Parkinson's disease, Hoehn and Yahr stage 5 on medication (non-ambulatory).
  4. Age > 80.
  5. Subjects with an implanted electronic device such as a neurostimulator, cardiac pacemaker/defibrillator or medication pump.
  6. Subjects, who are pregnant, are capable of becoming pregnant, or who are breast feeding.
  7. Patients with cortical atrophy out of proportion to age or focal brain lesions that could indicate a non-idiopathic movement disorder as determined by MRI
  8. Subjects having a major comorbidity increasing the risk of surgery (prior stroke,severe hypertension, severe diabetes, or need for chronic anti-coagulation other than aspirin).
  9. Subjects having any prior intracranial surgery.
  10. Subjects with a history of seizures.
  11. Subjects, who are immunocompromised.
  12. Subjects with an active infection.
  13. Subjects, who require diathermy, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), or transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to treat a chronic condition.
  14. Subjects, who have an inability to comply with study follow-up visits or study protocol.
  15. Subjects, who are unable to understand or sign the informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Activa PC+S Neurostimulator
All patients will complete motor testing on both continuous DBS and adaptive DBS during a study visit. The UPDRS rater and the patient will be blind to which type of stimulation they are on.
Device: Activa PC+S Neurostimulator
Activa PC+S Neurostimulator is approved for both aDBS and cDBS paradigms.
Other Names:
  • adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS)
  • continuous deep brain stimulation (cDBS)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability] Related to aDBS
Time Frame: 30 min - 2 hours
Safety, tolerability and feasibility of aDBS
30 min - 2 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Aim 1: Alpha Power
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Subthalamic nucleus (STN) local field potentials (LFP) recordings demonstrate oscillatory neuronal activity in both the alpha (8-12 Hz) and beta (13-30 Hz) bands in the resting state in PD. Spectrograms were generated using a short-time Fourier transform, with a 1 second Hanning window and a 0.5 second overlap, creating a frequency resolution of 1 Hz. Power spectral densities were calculated using the Welch method with the same window and overlap parameters. Power was summed in the beta and alpha bands. This power can be representative of the magnitude of oscillatory activity in this frequency band occurring in this brain region.
30 minutes
Aim 1: Beta Power
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Subthalamic nucleus (STN) local field potentials (LFP) recordings demonstrate oscillatory neuronal activity in both the alpha (8-12 Hz) and beta (13-30 Hz) bands in the resting state in PD. Spectrograms were generated using a short-time Fourier transform, with a 1 second Hanning window and a 0.5 second overlap, creating a frequency resolution of 1 Hz. Power spectral densities were calculated using the Welch method with the same window and overlap parameters. Power was summed in the beta and alpha bands. This power can be representative of the magnitude of oscillatory activity in this frequency band occurring in this brain region.
30 minutes
Aim 1: Alpha Sample Entropy
Time Frame: 30 minutes
The predictability of the local field potentials (band-pass filtered between 8-12 Hz for alpha) was analyzed using Sample Entropy (SampEn), a nonlinear measure suitable for physiological time series. SampEn may be a more consistent measure and more suitable to shorter time series data than approximate entropy, partially due to the elimination of counting self matches. SampEn is calculated as the negative logarithm of the estimated conditional probability that if consecutive subseries of length m are similar according to some preset tolerance r, the consecutive subseries of length m+1 will be similar too. Here the length of the vector pairs, m, denotes the embedding dimension.
30 minutes
Aim 1: Beta Sample Entropy
Time Frame: 30 minutes
The predictability of the local field potentials (band-pass filtered between 15-30 Hz for beta) was analyzed using Sample Entropy (SampEn), a nonlinear measure suitable for physiological time series. SampEn may be a more consistent measure and more suitable to shorter time series data than approximate entropy, partially due to the elimination of counting self matches. SampEn is calculated as the negative logarithm of the estimated conditional probability that if consecutive subseries of length m are similar according to some preset tolerance r, the consecutive subseries of length m+1 will be similar too. Here the length of the vector pairs, m, denotes the embedding dimension.
30 minutes
Aim 2: Asymmetry
Time Frame: 30 minutes

Asymmetry during both forward walking and stepping in place was calculated using periods of walking or stepping when the subject was not freezing. According to previous studies, asymmetry is defined as: 100*(absolute value of the natural log of the shorter average swing time over the longer average swing time) or mathematically: 100*| ln (SSWT/LSWT) |

where SSWT = shorter mean swing time LSWT = longer mean swing time
30 minutes
Aim 2: Arrhythmicity
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Arrhythmicity during both forward walking and stepping in place was calculated using periods of walking or stepping when the subject was not freezing. According to previous studies, arrhythmicity is defined as the mean stride time coefficient of variation of both legs, and a greater stride time CV implies less rhythmic gait or stepping. Higher arrhythmicity corresponds to more arrhythmic, or more impaired, gait.
30 minutes
Aim 2: Stride Time
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Kinematic Features associated with Freezing of Gait
30 minutes
Aim 2: Percent Time Freezing
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Freezing of gait episodes during stepping in place were identified using a validated computerized algorithm, and during forward walking by a blinded rater. The percent time freezing was calculated by dividing the time spent freezing by the total time to complete the task then multiplying by 100 to get a percent. If no freezing was observed, then the percent time freezing reported was 0.0%.
30 minutes
Percent Time Freezing
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Freezing of gait episodes during stepping in place were identified using a validated computerized algorithm. The percent time freezing was calculated by dividing the time spent freezing by the total time to complete the task then multiplying by 100 to get a percent. If no freezing was observed, then the percent time freezing reported was 0.0%. The percent time spent freezing was compared while the participant was doing the stepping in place task on continuous deep brain stimulation (cDBS) and while the participant was doing the stepping in place task on adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS).
30 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Stanford University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 6, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 6, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 21, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 5, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1R21NS096398 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Activa PC+S Neurostimulator

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings