Demand-driven Management of Essential Tremor

March 1, 2022 updated by: Andrew Ko, University of Washington

The Application of DBS Technologies for Demand-driven Management of Essential Tremor

This study evaluates the effectiveness of tremor control using various strategies for implementing demand-driven thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) for essential tremor. Therapeutic stimulation at the Vim nucleus of the thalamus will be initiated and modulated using signals derived from external sensors (e.g. EMG, accelerometer) and cortical or thalamic electrodes.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Essential tremor is effectively treated with deep brain stimulation of the ventralis intermedius nucleus of the thalamus, presumably because high-frequency stimulation disrupts aberrant cerebellar-thalamic input. For the most part, patients with essential tremor have a kinetic tremor that is present or worsened with movement. However, DBS therapy is currently continuous, and thus, stimulation occurs when the patient will not benefit symptomatically from treatment. This exposes the patient to unnecessary stimulation, which can lead to unnecessary usage of battery, unnecessary exposure to stimulation side-effects, and can possibly contribute to tolerance to DBS therapy.

One possible solution is selective stimulation when movement is required. This study will determine signals predictive of motor activity using external sensors such as EMG, and cortical biomarkers of real and imaginary movement that are well-characterized.

The primary aim is to demonstrate successful initiation and modulation of DBS therapy using the Activa PC+S system and implanted cortical or thalamic electrodes. Putative improvements in battery usage related to stimulation on-time and definition of coupling signals between thalamus and cortex that characterize tremor state are secondary outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195
        • University of Washington Department of Neurological Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Appropriate candidates for DBS with essential tremor

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not meeting inclusion criteria based on tremor amplitude, neuropsychological testing, etc.
  • Prior trauma to the brain on side of putative implantation of stimulator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Activa PC+S
Patients will be implanted with standard DBS electrodes for treatment of essential tremor, at the Vim nucleus of the thalamus, and an additional subdural electrode array overlying hand motor cortex.. The patient will receive standard of care programming for thalamic stimulation for essential tremor. During research study visits, implementation and evaluation of closed-loop DBS using the PC+S system will be performed.
Implementation of closed loop DBS for essential tremor

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with adverse events
Time Frame: 18 months
Adverse events will be tracked using CTCAE terminology.
18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Battery usage using demand-driven strategies for tremor control
Time Frame: 18 months
Battery usage will be measured as stimulation on-time and voltage over time using demand-driven stimulation paradigms versus continuous stimulation paradigm.
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrew Ko, MD, University of Washington

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2022

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2015

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 13, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Essential Tremor

Clinical Trials on Activa PC+S

3
Subscribe