Study to Evaluate ISV-305 Compared to Vehicle for Treatment of Inflammation and Pain Associated With Cataract Surgery (ISV-305)

November 18, 2021 updated by: Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited

A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Double-masked Study to Compare the Ocular Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of ISV-305 (0.1% Dexamethasone in DuraSite® 2) to DuraSite 2 Vehicle for the Treatment of Inflammation and Pain Associated With Cataract Surgery

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ocular safety, tolerability, and efficacy of ISV-305 (dexamethasone in DuraSite® 2) compared with Vehicle in the treatment of inflammation and pain associated with cataract surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ocular safety, tolerability, and efficacy of topical administration of ISV-305 (0.1% dexamethasone in DuraSite® 2) compared with Vehicle when dosed twice daily for 1 day prior to surgery, the day of surgery and 14 days post cataract surgery.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
260

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38120
        • Clinical Research Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Are at least 17 years of age
  • Are scheduled for uncomplicated unilateral cataract surgery
  • Signature of the subject or parent(s) or legally authorized representative on the Informed Consent Form, and when appropriate the minor's assent in accordance with local regulations
  • Are willing and able to follow all instructions and attend all study visits
  • Are willing to avoid disallowed medication for the duration of the study
  • If female is of childbearing potential, agree to and submit a urine sample for pregnancy testing (prior to enrollment and at the end of the study) and use effective contraception for the duration of the study
  • Male subjects whose female partners are not post-menopausal must agree to one of the following: 1) completely abstain from sexual intercourse, 2) use a barrier method (condoms) with spermicide during sexual intercourse for the duration of the study, 3) provide documentation for having had a vasectomy (with documented infertility)
  • Additional inclusion criteria also apply

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have known sensitivity or poor tolerance to any component of the study drugs
  • Have any sign of iritis or scleritis in the study eye
  • Have an acute ocular infection (bacterial, viral or fungal) or active ocular inflammation in the study eye
  • Have any active or chronic/recurrent ocular or systemic disease that is uncontrolled and likely to affect wound healing (e.g., diabetes mellitus, systemic connective tissue disease, severe atopic disease)
  • Have known blood dyscrasia or bone marrow suppression
  • Have any active corneal pathology in the study eye
  • Have had radial keratotomy, corneal transplant, or LASIK in the study eye within the last 2 years
  • Be currently pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy; or have a positive urine pregnancy test
  • Have prior (within 30 days of beginning study treatment) or anticipated concurrent use of an investigational drug or device
  • Have a condition or a situation which, in the investigator's opinion, may put the subject at increased risk, confound study data, or interfere significantly with the subject's study participation
  • Use of any medication the investigator feels may interfere with the study parameters
  • Additional exclusion criteria also apply

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: ISV-305
0.1% dexamethasone in DuraSite® 2
Drug: ISV-305
Dexamethasone in DuraSite® 2 twice daily for 16 days
Placebo Comparator: Vehicle
DuraSite® 2 Vehicle
Other: Vehicle
Vehicle twice daily for 16 days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Participants With Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade 0 in Study Eye at Day 15 (Last Observation Carried Forward) in the Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) Population
Time Frame: Day 15
Biomicroscopic measurement of anterior chamber cells was conducted in the surgery eye (study eye) by the same examiner from visit to visit whenever possible. A slit-lamp biomicroscope was used at x16 magnification with a 1 x 1 mm oblique high-intensity beam. Two cell counts were summed and divided by 2 to determine an average final anterior chamber cell count. This final cell count was converted to a grade: Grades 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 were assigned for cell counts of 0, 1 to 10, 11 to 20, 21 to 50, and > 50, respectively. If the averaged count fell between two grades, the higher grade was selected (e.g., if the two counts were 10 and 11, the average of 10.5 fell into Grade 2). Missing anterior chamber cell grade at Day 15 was imputed by last non-missing scheduled post-baseline anterior chamber cell grade assessed prior to Day 15 (last observation carried forward).
Day 15

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Participants Who Achieved a Pain Score of 0 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Each Post-surgical Assessment
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 29
Eye pain/discomfort in the study eye was evaluated at every visit except Visit 2 (Surgery; Day 0) using a VAS, scoring from 0 to 100 using a mark on a 100 mm line (0 = absent; 100 = maximum). Participants were asked to rate the feeling of the symptom in the study eye from absent to extreme by moving a slide on the side of the scale to align with images of descriptive faces.
Day 1 to Day 29

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 30, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 17, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 17, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 15, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 15, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 19, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 18, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • C-13-305-002

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inflammation and Pain Associated With Cataract Surgery

Clinical Trials on ISV-305

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings